ANWESH: International Journal of Management & Information Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on Relationship of Financial Autonomy and Investment Decision Making with Mediating Role of Society


Affiliations
1 School of Business Management (SBM), IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 DOMS, COER-School of Management, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This research paper is an explicit effort to understand the effect of financial autonomy and society on investment decision of individual. Society is a major factor which influences our living standard, thought process and objectives. It is well popular proverb that “Society makes a Man perfect”. Society has a greater influence on our decision making procedure, whether the decisions are taken for personal consumption or for investment decision. Financial autonomy has a grave importance in investment decision making. The current paper is an effort to establish the relation among the different factors, which influences the investment decision making.

Keywords

Financial Autonomy, Investment Decision, Mediation Effect, Society.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • W. D. Allen, and D. A. Evans, “Bidding and overconfidence in experimental financial markets,” The Journal of Behavioural Finance, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 108-120, 2005.

  • K. Arano, C. Parker, and R. Terry, “Gender-based risk aversion and retirement asset allocation,” Economic Inquiry, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 147-155, 2010.

  • G. J. Alexander, J. D. Jones, and P. J. Nigro, “Investor self-selection: Evidence from mutual fund industry,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 18, no. 7 & 8, p. 719, 1997.

  • F. A. Hayes, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, The Guilford Press, New Work, London, pp. 85-122, 2013.

  • R. B. Darlington, and F. A. Hayes, Regression Analysis and Linear Models, The Guilford Press, New Work, London, pp. 447-476, 2017.

  • V. L. Bajtelsmit, and A. Bernasek, “Why do women invest differently than men?,” Financial Counseling and Planning, vol. 7, pp. 1-10, 1996.

  • J. P. Byrnes, D. C. Miller, and W. D. Schafer, “Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 367-383, 1999.

  • Z. Bodie, A. Kane, and A. Marcus, Investment, 10th ed., McGraw-Hill, USA, 2014.

  • L. L. Embrey, and J. J. Fox, “Gender differences in the investment decision-making process,” Financial Counseling and Planning, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 33-40, 1997.

  • E. F. Fama, “The behaviour of stock market prices,” The Journal of Business, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 34-105, 1965.

  • E. F. Fama, “Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work,” Journal of Finance, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 383-417, 1970.

  • E. F. Fama, L. Fisher, M. Jensen, and R. Roll, “The adjustment of stock prices to new information,” International Economic Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 1969.

  • A. M. Hibbert, E. Lawrence, and A. Prakash, “Are Women More Risk-Averse Than Men?,” 2008. Available at http://new.cffit.de/fileadmin/docs/docs_cfp/ paper_2009/hibbert __lawrence __are_women_more_risk-averse_than_men.pdf.

  • A. Kumar, “Hard-to-value stocks, behavioural biases, and informed trading,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1375-1401, 2009.

  • C. G. Lord, L. Ross, and M. R. Lepper, “Biases assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2098-2109, 1979.

  • M. Mittal, and R. K. Vyas, “Demographics and investment choice among Indian investors,” The IUP Journal of Behavioural Finance, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 51-65, 2007.

  • S. N. Paul, and M. Jain, “A recent literature on behavioural factors that affect investment decision,” International Journal of Applied Financial Management Prospective, ISSN (2279-0896), 2007.

  • L. Peng, “Learning with information capacity constraints,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 307-329, 2005.

  • L. Peng, and W. Xiong, “Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 563-602, 2006.

  • M. Powell, and D. Ansic, “Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis”, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 605-628, 1997.

  • M. Prince, “Women, men and money styles,” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 175-182, 1993.

  • M. Powell, and D. Ansic, “Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision making: An experimental analysis,” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 605-628, 1997.

  • K. Ranganathan, “A study of fund selection behavior of individual investors towards mutual funds: With reference to Mumbai city,” The IUP Journal of Behavioural Finance, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 63-83, 2006.

  • W. Samuelson, and R. Zeckhauser, “Status quo bias in decision making,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7-59, 1988.

  • N. Siebenmorgen, and M. Weber, “The influence of different investment horizons on risk behaviour,” Journal of Behavioural Finance, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 75-90, 2004.

  • J. Singh, and S. Chander, “Investors’ preference for investment in mutual funds: An empirical evidence,” The IUP Journal of Behavioural Finance, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55-70, 2006.

  • A. E. Sunden, and B. J. Surette, “Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans,” American Economic Review, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 207-211, 1998.

  • W. R. Swinyard, “The effect of mood, involvement, and quality of store experience in shopping intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 271-280, 1993.

  • A. Tversky, and D. Kahneman, “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases,” Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, pp. 1124-1131, 1974.

  • J. E. Urbany, R. D. Peter, and W. L. Wilkie, “Buyer uncertainty and information search,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 208-215, 1989.

  • P. Wright, “The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions and the use of evidence,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 556-561, 1974.

  • L. Hu, and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-55, 1999.


Abstract Views: 435

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study on Relationship of Financial Autonomy and Investment Decision Making with Mediating Role of Society

Abstract Views: 435  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Som Nath Paul
School of Business Management (SBM), IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay
DOMS, COER-School of Management, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract


This research paper is an explicit effort to understand the effect of financial autonomy and society on investment decision of individual. Society is a major factor which influences our living standard, thought process and objectives. It is well popular proverb that “Society makes a Man perfect”. Society has a greater influence on our decision making procedure, whether the decisions are taken for personal consumption or for investment decision. Financial autonomy has a grave importance in investment decision making. The current paper is an effort to establish the relation among the different factors, which influences the investment decision making.

Keywords


Financial Autonomy, Investment Decision, Mediation Effect, Society.

References