Abhigyan

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Board Level Gender Diversity and Firm Financial Performance-Evidence from India


Affiliations
1 Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study investigates the effect of gender diversity on firm performance of Indian companies and whether higher proportion of independent women directors significantly and positively moderates the effect of gender diversity on firm performance. The study has been conducted on BSE 100 companies for a period of 9 years. Firm performance has been measured by two accounting measures viz. ROA and ROCE. Gender diversity has been measured by Blau's index and as proportion of women directors on board. Various other control variables viz. age, CEO duality, leverage, size, etc. have been used. Panel data regression analysis on the data reveals that gender diversity positively but insignificantly affects firm performance of Indian companies. Firms having higher proportion of independent women directors as compared to non-independent women directors earn higher returns. Higher proportion of independent women directors positively moderates the effect of gender diversity on firm performance, though the moderation is not significant.


Keywords

Corporate Governance, Gender Diversity, Women Directors, Independent Women Directors, Firm Performance.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Arioglu, E. (2015). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Research Journal of Business & Management, 2(1), 18-36.

  • Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer, 54(3), 921-963.

  • Bhalla, N. (2015). Indian firms mock gender diversity as boardroom deadline passes- analysts. New Delhi: Thomson Reuters Foundation.

  • Brennan, N., & McCafferty, J. (1997). Corporate governance practices in Irish companies. Irish Business and Administrative Research, 18, 116–135

  • Bulan, L., Sanyal, P., & Yan, Z. (2009). Directors, outsiders and efficiency- An analysis of how board characteristics influence firm productivity. Journal of Economics and Business, 61(6), 509-528.

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.

  • Chatterjee, D. (2011). Board composition and performance in Indian firms: A comparative analysis empirical. The International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology (IJMSIT), 1(2), 1-15

  • Cho, D.-S., & Kim, J. (2007). Outside directors, ownership structure and firm profitability in Korea. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 239-250.

  • Dezso, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does Female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.

  • Eklund, J. E, Palmberg, J., & Wiberg, D. (2009). Ownership structure, board composition and investment performance. CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper no. 172

  • Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance:An International Review, 11(2), 102-111.

  • Ghosh, S. (2016). Why is it a man's world after all? Women on bank boards in India. Economic Systems. 41 (1), 109-121.

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.

  • Hyun, E., Yang, D., Jung, H., & Hong, K. (2016). Women on boards and corporate social responsibility. MDPI, 8(4), 1-26.

  • Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from india's top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-509.

  • Julizaerma, M. K., & Sori, Z. M. (2012). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance of Malaysian public listed companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 1077-1085.

  • Kang, E., Ding, D. K., & Charoenwong, C. (2009). Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research, 63, 888-894.

  • Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 194-207.

  • Kramer, V. W., Konrad, A. M., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145-164.

  • Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2012). Outside directors, corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 39-55.

  • Marimuthu, M., & Kolandaisamy, I. (2009). Demographic diversity in top level management and its implications on firm financial performance: An empirical discussion. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(6), 176-188.

  • Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2010). Gender Diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Discussion Paper Series nr: 10-03, 2-28.

  • Miller, T., & Triana, M. d. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755-786.

  • Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404-413

  • Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299-377.

  • Veklenko, K. (2016). The impact of board composition on the firm's performance in continental Europe. 7th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference. The Netherlands: University of Twente, The Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences.

  • Wang, Y., & Clift, B. (2009). Is there a business case for board diversity? Pacific Accounting Review, 21(2), 88-193.

  • Zahidi, S., & Ibarra, H. (2010). The Corporate Gender Gap Report 2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum.


Abstract Views: 422

PDF Views: 1




  • Board Level Gender Diversity and Firm Financial Performance-Evidence from India

Abstract Views: 422  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Manjula Shukla
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


The present study investigates the effect of gender diversity on firm performance of Indian companies and whether higher proportion of independent women directors significantly and positively moderates the effect of gender diversity on firm performance. The study has been conducted on BSE 100 companies for a period of 9 years. Firm performance has been measured by two accounting measures viz. ROA and ROCE. Gender diversity has been measured by Blau's index and as proportion of women directors on board. Various other control variables viz. age, CEO duality, leverage, size, etc. have been used. Panel data regression analysis on the data reveals that gender diversity positively but insignificantly affects firm performance of Indian companies. Firms having higher proportion of independent women directors as compared to non-independent women directors earn higher returns. Higher proportion of independent women directors positively moderates the effect of gender diversity on firm performance, though the moderation is not significant.


Keywords


Corporate Governance, Gender Diversity, Women Directors, Independent Women Directors, Firm Performance.

References