Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Relation between the Chaos Equation and Gender Differences of the Human Brain- Nightingale’s brain was the fixed type
Subscribe/Renew Journal
There are many studies reporting differences between the female brain and the male brain, but it has also been reported that human brains do not belong to one of the two distinct categories: female versus male. Functional gender differences of the brain may be attributable to environmental factors rather than to one's gender. In this paper, the processes of adapting to one's environment have been demonstrated through Piaget's developmental theory explained by chaos theory. A conclusive type of thought such as the male brain is equivalent to a fixed state and female brain is equivalent to a chaotic state. Fixed state and chaotic state change according to changes in variables of chaos theory. Thoughts change with environment because the changes in variables are equivalent to changes in environment. In human life, the ability of the brain to adapt to environments may be more useful than gender differences. In chaos theory, gender differences of the brain are part of adaptations to environment. If Nightingale's brain was the chaotic type, she would have permitted the miserable state of the Crimean War to continue. Therefore, Nightingale's brain was the fixed type. However, the conclusion that Nightingale's brain was the male type should not be permitted. This is an example of how using "gender" to describe the types of thoughts in the brain is incorrect. The female and the male brain should be referred to as chaotic type thoughts and fixed type thoughts, respectively, because brain type is not decided solely by gender differences.
Keywords
Continuous Co Variation, Fixed State, Convergence, Environment Adaptation, Gender Difference.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Richardson, S. S. Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2013
- Schiebinger, L. The Mind Has No Sex?: Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1989.
- Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T.D., Elliott M.A., Ruparel, K., Hakonarson, H., Gur, R.E., Gur, R.C., and Verma, R. Sex differences in the structural connect me of the human brain. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 111(2); 2014: 823-828.
- Joel, D. Male or female? Brains are intersex. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 5; 2011: 57.
- Joel, D. Genetic-gonadal-genitals sex (3G-sex) and the misconception of brain and gender, or, why 3G-males and 3G-females have intersex brain and intersex gender. Biology of Sex Differences. 3(1); 2012: 27.
- Ojose, A.B. Applying Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development to Mathematics Instruction. Mathematics Educator. 18 (1); 2008: 26-36.
- Yanagisawa, H. Relationship of a chaos equation to Piaget's developmental theory and selective attention deficits. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology. 18(1); 2016: 18-23
- Arnold, A.P. The organizational-activational hypothesis as the foundation for a unified theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues. Hormones and Behavio. 55(5); 2009: 570-578.
- Kellert, H. S. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical System. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 1993.
- Yanagisawa, H. Contradiction and Development of Modern Science Beyond Chaos Theory. Tokyo: Kirishobo Co.; 1996. pp. 115-123. (in Japanese)
- Feigenbaum, M. J. Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations. Journal of Statistical Physics. 19(1); 1978: 25-52.
- Pease, A. & Pease, B. Why Men don’t listen and Women Can't Read Maps: How we’re Different and What to Do About It. New York, Broadway; 2001.
- Flavell, J. Piaget's legacy. Psychological Science. 7 (4); 1996: 200203.
- McDonald, L. Florence Nightingale's Suggestions for Thought: Collected Works of Florence Nightingale. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press. 2008; pp. 794.
Abstract Views: 322
PDF Views: 0