Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Karishma, Chitte
- Impact of Tillage Practices on Water Use and Energy Efficiency in Cotton under Rainfed Condition
Abstract Views :588 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
1 Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
Source
An Asian Journal of Soil Science, Vol 15, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 22-26Abstract
The field experiment was conducted at Central Research Station (CRS) of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. The experiment field consist of 6 different treatments and 4 replications viz., conservation tillage (1 blade harrow before sowing) (T1), conservation tillage (1 Tyne+1 blade harrow) (T2), sub- surface tillage (90 cm H.I+2 Tyne+ blade harrow) (T3). Economical sub-surface tillage (1 sub surface +1 tyne+1 blade harrow) (T4), 1 Ploughing+ 2 Tyne +1 blade harrow (T5), Across the slope cultivation with opening of BBF after two row+2 tyne+1 blade harrow (T6). Water use efficiency was more dominant in treatment T3 (2.92kg ha-1mm-1), the energy efficiency is maximum for treatment T3 (3.7) followed by treatments, T4, T5, T6, T2and T1.Keywords
Harrow, Efficiency, Tillage, Conservation, Energy.
References
- Berhe, F.T., Fanta, A., Alamirew, T. and Melesse, A.M. (2012). The effect of tillage practices on grain yield and water use efficiency. Catena., 100 : 128–138.
- Dagdelen, N., Ersel, Y., Fuat, S. and Talih, G. (2006). Wateryield relation and water use efficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and second crop corn (Zea mays L.) in western Turkey. Agricultural Water Management, 82 : 63–85.
- Faeznia, F. and Shamabadi, Z. (2012). Evaluation the effect of conservation tillage on rainfed wheat yield and energy Efficiency. Intl. J. Agric. Crop Sci., 4 (22) : 1706-1713.
- Karimi, M., Rajabi Pour, A., Tabatabaeefar, A. and Borghei, A. (2008). Energy analysis of sugarcane production in plant farms a case study in Debel Khazai Agro-industry in Iran, American-Eurasian. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 4 (2): 165-171.
- Michael, A.M. and Ojha, T.P. (1983).Principles of agriculture engineering,2. Jain Brothers, Ratanda Road, Jodhpur (Rajasthan) India.
- Mohammad, A. K., Shahbz, K. and Shahbaz, M. (2009).Energy and economic efficiency analysis of rice and cotton production in China Sarhad. J. Agric., 25(2): 291-300.
- Patil, S.S. and Taley, S.M. (2013). Impact of in situ soil and water conservation measures on water use and production efficiency for cotton. Internat. J. Agric. Engg., 6 (2) : 444-448.
- Regar, P.L., Rao, S.S. and Joshi, N.L. (2009). Effect of In situ moisture conservation practices on productivity of rain fed + taramira (Eruca sativa) in arid Rajasthan. Indian J. Soil. Cons., 37 (3) : 197-200.
- Singh, R.K., Singh, Balram and Bangali, B. (2011). Effect of in-situ soil moisture conservation practices on growth, moisture use efficiency and kusmi lac yield of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) under rainfed condition in Jharkhand. J. Agric. Engg., 48 (3): 32 - 35.
- Srivastava, A.C. (1982). A comparative study of conventional and mechanized farming relative to energy use and cost. AMA. 42-46pp.
- Wuren, H., Zhihzui, B., Daniel, H.,Qing, H., Xin, L., Guoqiang, Z., Shengjun, X., Hongyan, Q. and Hongxun, Z. (2012). Effects of cotton straw amendment on soil fertility and microbial communities. Front. Environ. Sci. Engg., 6 (3): 336 –349 .
- Yadav, S.S., Jagdish Prasad, Gaikwad, S.T. and Thayalan, S. (1998). Landform-soil relationship and its impact on soil properties. J. Indian Soc. Soil. Sci., 46 (2) : 332-335.