Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Generalised Measure of Disparity for Dichotomous Populations


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Many populations are intrinsically dichotomous and many others are meaningfully dichotomized. For gauging the level of disparity between two sections with respect to a certain trait, many disparity indices have been devised. They are all based on aggregate sectional rates. They all err ignoring the relative size of the two sections, thus tacitly assuming that the two sections an of equal size. This paper devises a new positive disparity measure through a simple geometrical device and generalises it for the situation of unequal size sections. The measures are applied to female-male and rural-urban dichotomies in the case of literacy for the States of India. It is found that a disparity measure that ignores the issue of relative size, grossly underestimates/overestimates the magnitude of disparity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 627

PDF Views: 1




  • A Generalised Measure of Disparity for Dichotomous Populations

Abstract Views: 627  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

P. K. Chaubey
Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi, India

Abstract


Many populations are intrinsically dichotomous and many others are meaningfully dichotomized. For gauging the level of disparity between two sections with respect to a certain trait, many disparity indices have been devised. They are all based on aggregate sectional rates. They all err ignoring the relative size of the two sections, thus tacitly assuming that the two sections an of equal size. This paper devises a new positive disparity measure through a simple geometrical device and generalises it for the situation of unequal size sections. The measures are applied to female-male and rural-urban dichotomies in the case of literacy for the States of India. It is found that a disparity measure that ignores the issue of relative size, grossly underestimates/overestimates the magnitude of disparity.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F1999%2Fv41%2Fi2%2F115873