Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Power–The Bete Noire in Much of Modern Economics


Affiliations
1 Graz Schumpeter Centre, University of Graz, Austria
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Power is a pervasive phenomenon in the economy and society, associated with inequality of income, wealth, race, gender, information etc. However, power has been and still is the bête noire in much of modern economics, with only a few exceptions. In non-mainstream economics, in the classical, the Marxian, the Kaleckian and the Post-Keynesian currents of thought, power is an important analytical category. Yet in the main parts of contemporary mainstream economics, especially in much of conventional micro- and macroeconomics, no attempt is made to come to grips with what power means and what its effects are, and the systemic importance of power relationships is widely ignored. Against this backdrop, this paper attempts to bring to the fore ideas of past economists and social and political philosophers, who basically saw socio-economic affairs and outcomes as driven by, and reflecting, power relationships, starting with the writings of late mercantilist and early classical economists. It also analyses how the attention in economics shifted away from the problem of power from the latter part of the nineteenth century with the rise to dominance of marginalist economics.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alchian, A. and H. Demsetz (1972), Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization, American Economic Review, 62: 777–795.
  • Anonymous (1821), An Inquiry into those Principles Respecting the Nature of Demand and the Necessity of Consumption, Lately Advocated by Mr Malthus, from which it is Concluded, that Taxation and the Maintenance of Unproductive Consumers can be Conducive to the Progress of Wealth, London: R. Hunter.
  • Arrow, K.J. and F.H. Hahn (1971), General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco: Holden-Day.
  • Arrow, K.J. and G. Debreu (1954), Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy, Econometrica, 22: 265–290.
  • Barkai, H. (1996), Oppenheimer and the Zionist resettlement of Palestine: The Genossenschaft versus the collective settlement, in V. Caspari and B. Schefold (Eds.), Franz Oppenheimer und Adolph Lowe, Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 17–63.
  • Barkai, H. (1989), Economics and Power: An Inquiry into Human Relations and Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Berger, J. and H.G. Nutzinger (Eds.) (2008), Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz, in Jahrbuch für Ökonomie und Gesellschaft, 21, Marburg: Metropolis.
  • Bhaduri, A. (2016), On Democracy, Corporations and Inequality, Economic and Political Weekly, 51(13), March 26.
  • Bharadwaj, K. (1976), Classical Political Economy and the Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theory, Dutt Lectures, Calcutta: Orient Longman, 2nd revised edition 1986.
  • ---------- (1989), Themes in Value and Distribution, Classical Theory Reappraised, London: Unwin Hyman.
  • ---------- (1990), Sraffa’s Return to Classical Theory, in K. Bharadwaj and B. Schefold (Eds.) (1990), pp. 53–81.
  • Bharadwaj, K. and B. Schefold (Eds.) (1990), Essays on Piero Sraffa. Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory, London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Böhm-Bawerk, E.v. (1914), Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Socialpolitik und Verwaltung, 23: 205–271.
  • ---------- (2010), Control or Economic Law, Translation of Böhm-Bawerk (1914) by J.R. Mez, Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • Bowles, S. and H. Gintis (2008), Power, In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed., edited by S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume, London: Macmillan, pp. 565–570.
  • Clark, J.M. (1918), Economics and Modern Psychology, Journal of Political Economy, 26(1): 1–30.
  • Dahl, R.A. (1957), The concept of power, Behavioral Science, 2(3): 201–215.
  • Dugger, W.M. (1980), Power: An Institutional Framework of Analysis, Journal of Economic Issues, 14(4): 897–907.
  • Faccarello, G., C. Gehrke, and H.D. Kurz (2016), Karl Heinrich Marx (1818-1883), in G.
  • Faccarello and H.D. Kurz (Eds.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis, Vol. 1, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 211–233.
  • Flatau, P. (2001), Some Reflections on the “Pigou-Robinson” Theory of Exploitation, History of Economics Review, 33(1): 1–16.
  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Galbraith, J.K. (1952), American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • ---------- (1983), The Anatomy of Power, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Garegnani, P. (1970), Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function, and the Theory of Distribution, Review of Economic Studies, 73(3): 407–436.
  • ---------- (1984), Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx, Oxford Economic Papers, 36(2): 291–325.
  • ---------- (1987), Surplus Approach to Value and Distribution, In The New Palgrave, Edited by J.
  • Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, Vol. 4, London: Macmillan, pp. 560–576.
  • George, H. (1879), Progress and Poverty, New York: Appleton and Company.
  • Goodwin, R.M. (1967), A Growth Cycle, in C. H. Feinstein (Ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Essays presented to Maurice Dobb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–58.
  • Gossen, H.H. ([1854] 1983), Entwickelung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln, Braunschweig, English translation as The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom, edited and introduced by N. Georgescu-Roegen, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, New York: International Publishers.
  • Harcourt, G.C. (1972), Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hayek, F.A. ([1979] 1982), The Political Order of a Free People, first published in1979. Reprinted in Law, Legislation and Liberty. London: Routledge.
  • Hegel, G.W.F. ([1807] 1979), Phänomenologie des Geistes, Theorie Werkausgabe, Vol. 3, Frankfurt Suhrkamp.
  • Held, M., G. Kubon-Gilke, and R. Sturn (Eds.), Macht in der Ökonomie, Jahrbuch Normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik, Vol. 7, Marburg: Metropolis.
  • Hilferding, R. (1910), Das Finanzkapital. Eine Studie zur jüngsten Entwicklung des Kapitalismus, Vienna: Verlag der Wiener Volksbuchhandlung Ignaz Brand & Co.
  • Hobbes, T. (1651), Leviathan or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill, London: Andrew Crooke. Cited after the version prepared by Rod Hay for the McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought.
  • Honneth, A. (1992), Kampf um Anerkennung, Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Isaac, J. C. (1987), Power and Marxist Theory: A Realist View, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Jessop, B. (2007), State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • ---------- (2012), Marxist Approaches to Power, in E. Amenta, K. Nash and A. Scott (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 3–14.
  • Kalecki, M. (1939), Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations, London: Allen & Unwin.
  • ---------- (1943), Political Aspects of Full Employment, Political Quarterly, 14(4): 322–331.
  • ---------- (1954), Theory of Economic Dynamics: An Essay on Cyclical and Long-run Changes in Capitalist Economy. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • ---------- (1971), Class Struggle and the Distribution of National Income, Kyklos, 24(1): 1–9.
  • Kalecki, M., and T. Kowalik (1971), Observations on the “crucial reform”, Politica ed Economica, 2-3: 190-6. Reprinted in J. Osiatýnski (Ed.), Collected Works of Michał Kalecki, Vol. I, Capitalism, Business Cycles and Full Employment, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1990, pp. 466–476.
  • Kalmbach, P. (2008), Anmerkungen zum Verhältnis von Macht und ökonomischem Gesetz, in J.
  • Berger and H.G. Nutzinger (Eds.), Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz, Jahrbuch für Ökonomie und Gesellschaft, 21: 83–102.
  • Keynes, J.M. (1971), A Tract on Monetary Reform, 1st Edition 1923, Reprinted in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. IV, London: Macmillan.
  • King, J. (2013a), David Ricardo, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • ---------- (2013b), Whatever Happened to the “crucial reform”?, manuscript, Melbourne, La Trobe University.
  • Knight, F.H. ([1934] 1982), Social Science and the Political Trend, In Freedom and Reform.
  • Essays in Economic and Social Philosophy, Liberty Press.
  • Krause, U. (2008), Kollektive Dynamik bei verteilter Information, In Berger and Nutzinger (Eds.), pp. 105–119.
  • Kurz, H.D. (1996), Franz Oppenheimer und das Problem der “Bodensperrung”, in V. Caspari and B. Schefold (Eds.), Franz Oppenheimer und Adolph Lowe, Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 65–120.
  • ---------- (2006), David Ricardo, in H.D. Kurz and C. Gehrke (Eds.), David Ricardo, Über die Grundsätze der Politischen Ökonomie und Besteuerung, Marburg: Metropolis, pp. xi-lxx.
  • ---------- (2011), Einhundert Jahre Rudolf Hilferdings Das Finanzkapital, in G. Chaloupek, H.D.
  • Kurz and W. Smaldone (Eds.), Rudolf Hilferding: Finanzkapital und organisierter Kapitalismus, Vienna: Leykam, pp. 9–50.
  • ---------- (2012), Don’t Treat to Ill my Piero! Interpreting Sraffa’s papers, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36: 1535–1569.
  • ---------- (2013), Das Problem der nichtintendierten Konsequenzen, Zur Politischen Ökonomie von Karl Marx, Marx-Engels-Jahrbuch 2012/13, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 75–112.
  • ---------- (2015), David Ricardo on the art of “elucidating economic principles” in the face of a “labyrinth of difficulties”, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(5): 818–851.
  • Kurz, H.D. (2016a), Adam Smith on Markets, Competition and Violations of Natural Liberty, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(2): 615–638.
  • ---------- (2016b), David Ricardo (1772-1823), in G. Faccarello and H.D. Kurz (Eds.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis, Volume I, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 120–143.
  • ---------- (2016c), German and Austrian Schools, in G. Faccarello and H.D. Kurz (Eds.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis, Volume II, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 252–273.
  • ---------- (2016d), Economic Thought: A Brief History, New York: Columbia University Press, Paperback edition 2017.
  • Kurz, H.D. and N. Salvadori (1995), Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Revised paperback edition 1997.
  • ---------- (Eds.) (2015), The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  • ---------- (2004), Von Neumann, the Classical Economists and Arrow-Debreu: Some Notes, Acta Oeconomica, 54(1): 39–62.
  • Kurz, H.D. and R. Sturn (2013), Die größten Ökonomen: Adam Smith, Konstanz: UVK.
  • Le Bon, G. (2002), The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, English translation of the French original, Mineolo, NY: Dover Publications.
  • Lukes, S. (2005), Power: A Radical View, 2nd Edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Marglin, S. (1974), What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production, Review of Radical Political Economics, 6: 60–112.
  • Marx, K. (1867), Das Kapital, Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie, Hamburg: Otto Meißner. Reprint of the first edition in MEGA2 II/5, Berlin: Dietz Verlag 1983, and of the fourth edition, edited by Friedrich Engels (1890), in MEGA2 II/10, Berlin: Dietz Verlag 1991.
  • ---------- (1939-1941), Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, first published in 19391941, photomechanical reprint Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1953, Here quoted after its reprint in MEGA2 II/1.
  • ---------- (1954), Capital, Vol. I, London: Lawrence & Wishart (Translation of the fourth German edition, edited by Friedrich Engels in 1890).
  • ---------- (1959), Capital, Vol. III, London: Lawrence & Wishart (Edited by Friedrich Engels).
  • Marx, K. and F. Engels ([1945] 1976), The German Ideology, Moscow: Progress Publishers (Originally published in German in 1845 as Die deutsche Ideologie).
  • McKenzie, L.W. (1981), The Classical Theorem on the Existence of Competitive Equilibrium, Econometrica, 49(3): 819–841.
  • MEGA2 – Marx, K. and F. Engels (1976-2012), Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), International MarxEngels Foundation (IMES) (Ed.), Second department: “Das Kapital” und Vorarbeiten, 15 volumes in 23 separate parts, 1976–2012, several editors, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, http://www.oldenbourg-verlag.de/akademie-verlag/marx-engels-gesamtausgabe, In the text referred to as MEGA2, volume number, part number, page number.
  • Minsky, H. (1986), Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Naorodji, D. (1901), Poverty and Un-British Rule in India, London: Swan, Sonnenschein & Co.
  • Nell, E.J. (2018), Progress and Poverty in Economics, Henry George and How Growth in Real Estate Contributes to Inequality and Financial Instability, New York: Wapner-Truitt.
  • Opocher, A. and I. Steedman (2015), Full Industry Equilibrium, A Theory of the Industrial Long Run, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oppenheimer, F. (1914), The State, Its History and Development Viewed Sociologically, New York: Vanguard Press.
  • Pantaleoni, M. (1898), An Attempt to Analyse the Concepts of “strong and weak” in Their Economic Connection, Economic Journal, 8(30): 183–205.
  • Pigou, A.C. (1920), The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan.
  • Popitz, H. (1986), Phänomene der Macht, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2nd enlarged Ed. 1992.
  • Preiser, E. ([1948] 1952), Property and Power in the Theory of Distribution, International Economic Papers, 2: 206–220, Originally published in German in 1948; English version reprinted in Rothschild (1971).
  • ---------- (1970), Wachstum und Einkommensverteilung, 3rd Ed. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
  • Reinert, E.S., Ghosh, J. and R. Kattel (Eds.) (2016), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  • Ricardo, D. (1951-1973), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 volumes, edited by P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, In the text referred to as Works, volume number and page number.
  • Robinson, J. (1933), The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London: Macmillan.
  • Rothbard, M. (1970), Power and Market, Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
  • Rothschild, K.W. (2002), The Absence of Power in Ccontemporary Economic Theory, Journal of Socio-Economics, 31: 433–442.
  • ---------- (Ed.) (1971), Power in Economics, in Penguin Modern Economics Readings, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
  • Russell, B. (1938), Power: A New Social Analysis, London: Allen & Unwin.
  • ---------- (1967-1969), The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, There Volumes, London: George Allen & Unwin.
  • ---------- (2009), The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell, Ed. by R.E. Egner and L.E. Denonn, with an introduction by J.G. Slater, London and New York: Routledge, First published 1961 by George Allen & Unwin, London.
  • Salvadori, N. and R. Signorino (2013), The Classical Notion of Competition Revisited, History of Political Economy, 45(1): 149–175.
  • Samuels, W.J. (1973), Adam Smith and the Economy as a System of Power, Review of Social Economy, 31(2): 123–137.
  • ---------- (Ed.) (1979), The Economy as a System of Power, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Schneider, H.K. and Watrin, C. (Eds.) (1973), Macht und ökonomisches Gesetz, Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, new series, Vol. 74/II, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, translation of the second substantially revised and shortened German edition (1st Ed. 1912), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Simon, H.A. (1957), Models of Man, New York: Wiley.
  • Smith, A. ([1776] 1976), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 volumes, In R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner (Eds.), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • ---------- (1969 [1759]), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1st Edition 1759, 6th Edition 1790, with an introduction by E.G. West, Liberty Classics: Indianapolis.
  • Sraffa, P. (1951), Introduction, in Ricardo, D. (1951-73), Works I, pp. xiii–lxii.
  • ---------- (1960), Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Starrett, D. (1978), Market Allocations of Location Choice in a Model with Free Mobility, Journal of Economic Theory, 17: 21–37.
  • Steuart, Sir James ([1767] 1966), An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy, in two volumes, edited and with an introduction by A.S. Skinner, Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Bond.
  • Stolzmann, R. (1896), Die soziale Kategorie in der Volkswirthschaftslehre, Berlin: Puttkamer & Mühlbrecht.
  • Tugan-Baranowsky, M. (1913), Soziale Theorie der Verteilung, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Macmillan.
  • ---------- (1904), The Theory of Business Enterprise, New York: Scribner.
  • Weber, M. ([1922] 1972), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 5th ed., Tübingen: Mohr. (1st ed. in Grundriß der Sozialökonomik, Part III, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  • Weise, P. (2008), Machtlosigkeit als Referenzzustand. In Berger and Nutzinger (Eds.), pp. 63– 81.
  • Wieser, F.v. (1884), Über den Ursprung und die Hauptgesetze des wirthschaftlichen Werthes, Wien: Alfred Hölder.
  • ---------- (1889), Der natürliche Werth, Wien: Alfred Hölder, English translation as Natural Value (1893).
  • ---------- (1910), Recht und Macht, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
  • ---------- (1926), Das Gesetz der Macht, Vienna: Julius Springer.

Abstract Views: 536

PDF Views: 1




  • Power–The Bete Noire in Much of Modern Economics

Abstract Views: 536  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Heinz D. Kurz
Graz Schumpeter Centre, University of Graz, Austria

Abstract


Power is a pervasive phenomenon in the economy and society, associated with inequality of income, wealth, race, gender, information etc. However, power has been and still is the bête noire in much of modern economics, with only a few exceptions. In non-mainstream economics, in the classical, the Marxian, the Kaleckian and the Post-Keynesian currents of thought, power is an important analytical category. Yet in the main parts of contemporary mainstream economics, especially in much of conventional micro- and macroeconomics, no attempt is made to come to grips with what power means and what its effects are, and the systemic importance of power relationships is widely ignored. Against this backdrop, this paper attempts to bring to the fore ideas of past economists and social and political philosophers, who basically saw socio-economic affairs and outcomes as driven by, and reflecting, power relationships, starting with the writings of late mercantilist and early classical economists. It also analyses how the attention in economics shifted away from the problem of power from the latter part of the nineteenth century with the rise to dominance of marginalist economics.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2018%2Fv60%2Fi4%2F178083