Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Chaturvedi, A. K.
- Enhancing Yield and Economics of Field Pea Through Front Line Demonstration
Abstract Views :408 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (IIVR) Bejwan, Sant Ravidas Nagar (U.P.), IN
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (IIVR) Bejwan, Sant Ravidas Nagar (U.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (IIVR) Bejwan, Sant Ravidas Nagar (U.P.), IN
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (IIVR) Bejwan, Sant Ravidas Nagar (U.P.), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 494-498Abstract
Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is a good source of dietary protein to complement the cereal based diet, particularly for vegetarian masses in the country. It is a Rabi pulse crop which is highly productive and is grown for food, feed and vegetable. Present study was carried out in different villages (17) and blocks (03) of Sant Ravidas Nagar district. Fifty nine front line demonstrations on Malviya Matar-15, a promising cultivar of field pea developed from B.H.U., Varanasi were conducted during 2011-12 and 2012-13 by KVK, Sant Ravidas Nagar. Appropriate interventions viz., improved variety of seed, balance application of fertilizers, weed control, proper seed rate, sowing methods, plant protection measures were adopted under front line demonstration on field pea. The results revealed that improved variety gave 32.9 and 36.89 per cent higher yield with net income Rs. 38402 and Rs. 46419 per hectare over local check variety 'Rachna' during respective years. However, benefit cost ratio was observed as 2.2 and 2.28 during 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively. In the line of promotion of such improved technology, extensive field days were organized where the farmers of adjoining villages had seen the impact of improved technology at their own or nearby field. Presently, 48 per cent farmers are growing this variety successfully in adopted villages of KVK. Thus, the results of front line demonstration of field pea clearly indicated that by adoption of appropriate interventions, production and productivity of field pea could be enhanced substantially and providing suitable and sustainable option to farmers of eastern Uttar Pradesh.Keywords
Economics, Field Pea, Front Line Demonstration, Technology Gap.
References
- Anonymous (2010). Department of agriculture and co-operation, directorate of economics and statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, DELHI (INDIA).
- Anonymous (2012). Department of agriculture and co-operation, directorate of economics and statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, DELHI (INDIA).
- Anonymous (2013). State Department of Agriculture, Sant Ravidas Nagar (Action Plan, 2012-13) Govt. of U.P., INDIA.
- Balai, C.M., Meena, R.P., Meena, B.L. and Bairwa, R.K. (2012). Impact of frontline on rapeseed and mustard yield improvement. Indian Res. J. Extn Edu., 12 (2): 113-116.
- Burman, R.R., Singh, S.K. and Singh, A.K. (2010). Gap in adoption of improved pulse production technologies in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 10 (1): 99-104.
- Choudhary, BN. (1999). Krishi Vigyan Kendra-guide for KVK managers. Publication, Division of Agril. Extn., ICAR, pp. 73-78.
- Katare, Subhash, Pandey, S.K. and Mustafa, M. (2011). Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstrations. Agric. Update, 6(2):5-7.
- Khandare, K.A. (2002). A study on training needs of cotton growers about plant protection measure. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA).
- Mitra, B. and Samajdar, T. (2010). Yield gap analysis of rapseed and mustard through frontline demonstrations. Agril. Ext. Rev., 22 (2):16-17.
- Prakash, V., Singh, H.C. and Mishra, B. (2004). Technology gap in rice production technology. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 4 (1&2): 244-247.
- Sagar, S.L. and Chandra, G. (2004). Frontline demonstration on sesame in West Bengal. Agril. Extn. Rev., 16 (2): 7-10.
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut. J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.
- Singh, Atar, Singh, Lakhan and Prasad, R. (2002). Effect of front line demonstrations on pulses yield during different seasons of yield in U.P. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 2(2):64-66.
- Singh, R.K., Singh, V.B., Nayak, R., Singh, A.K. and Kannaujia, S.K. (2014). Comparative evaluation of front line demonstration on yield and economics of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in eastern U.P. Agric. Update, 9(1): 41-43.
- Vaghasia, P.M., Savalia, R.L. and Kelaiya, G.R. (2005). Evaluation of frontline demonstrations on groundnut in Saurashtra region of Gujarat. J. Oilseeds Res., 22 (1): 238-239.