Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Jadav, H. R.
- Role of Front Line Demonstrations on the Performance of Drilled Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Abstract Views :396 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (N.A.U.), Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (N.A.U.), Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 520-522Abstract
The rice covers largest area in total grain production in Narmada district of Gujarat. One of the major constraints of low productivity of rice is lack of technical knowhow of newly generated technology among farmers. The present study named dissemination of improved production technologies of rice in Narmada district of Gujarat through front line demonstrations (FLD) and its impact assessment. A total of 34 front line demonstrations were conducted during 2012 to 2013 on area of 7.8 ha with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the latest technology of rice production. The percentage increase in the yield over local check was 20.5 with higher gross return of 15528 Rs./ha, net return of 5652 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 1.6 as compared to local check (12882 Rs./ha, 3851 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 1.4, respectively). By conduction of frontline demonstrations on farmer's field there was significant increase in knowledge level of the farmers and majority of farmer's showed high level of satisfaction about demonstrated technologies.Keywords
Rice, FLD, Extension Gap, Technology Gap, Yield.
References
- Balai, C.M., Bairwa, R.K., Roat, B.L. and Meena, B.L. (2013). Impact of front line demonstration on maize yield improvement in tribal belt of Rajasthan. Res. J. Agri. Sci., 4 (3): 369-371.
- Chaudhary, B.N. (1999). Krishi Vigyan Kendra-a guide for KVK manager. Division of Agriculture Extension, ICAR, pp.73-78.
- Katare, S., Pandey, S.K. and Mustafa, M. (2011). Yield gap analysis of rapseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Update, 6 (2): 5-7.
- Mitra, B. and Samajdar, T. (2010). Field gap analysis of rapseedmustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Extn. Rev., 16-17.
- Mokidue, I., Mohanty, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011). Corelating growth, yield and adoption of urdbean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11 (2): 20-24.
- Raj, A.D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Evaluation of front line demonstrations on the yield of drilled rice (Oryza sativa). Agric. Update, 8 (4): 565-568.
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18 (2): 180-183.
- Venkattakumar, R., Ramana Rao, S.V., Padmaiah, M. and Madhuri, P. (2010). Production constraints and information needs of growers in Andhra Pradesh, Agric. Extn. Rev., 22(2): 25-28.
- Anonymous (2008). http://agri.gujarat.gov.in/hods/dire_agriculture/statistics_crops1949 06.htm.
- Evaluation of Front Line Demonstrations on the Yield of Transplanted Rice
Abstract Views :312 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (N.A.U.), Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (N.A.U.), Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 558-561Abstract
The rice (Oryza sativa) covers largest area in total grain production in Narmada district of Gujarat. One of the major constraints of low productivity of rice is lack of newly generated technology among farmers. A total of 54 front line demonstrations were conducted during 2012 to 2013 on area of 9.0 ha with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the latest variety technology of rice production. The percentage increase in the yield over local check was 20.4 with higher gross return of 41805 Rs./ha, net return of 29359 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 3.4 as compared to local check (34752 Rs./ha, 22755 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 2.9, respectively).Keywords
Rice, FLD, Extension Gap, Technology Gap, Yield.References
- Anonymous (2011). Vital agriculture statistics, Department of Agriculture, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Jaipur (RAJASTHAN) INDIA.
- Chaudhary, B.N. (1999). Krishi Vigyan Kendra-a guide for KVK manager. Division of Agriculture Extension, ICAR, pp.73-78.
- Katare, S., Pandey, S.K. and Mustafa, M. (2011). Yield gap analysis of rapseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Update, 6(2):5-7.
- Mishra, B. (2005). More crop per drop. The Hindu, Survey of Indian Agriculture. 41.
- Mitra, B. and Samajdar, T. (2010). Field gap analysis of rapseedmustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Extn. Rev., 16-17.
- Mokidue, I., Mohanty, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011). Corelating growth, yield and adoption of urdbean technologies. Indian J. Ext. Edu., 11 (2): 20-24.
- Raj, A. D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J. H. (2013). Evaluation of front line demonstrations on the yield of drilled rice (Oryza sativa). Agric. Update, 8 (4): 565-568.
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A. K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.
- Santhi, P. Ponnuswamy, K. and Chetty, N.K. (1998). Effect of seeding methods and efficient nitrogen management practices on the growth of lowland rice. J. Ecobiol., 10(2): 123-132.
- Sharma, R.N. and Sharma, K.C. (2004). Evaluation of front line demonstraion trials on oilseeds in Baran district of Rajasthan.Madhya J. Extn. Edu.,7: 72-75.
- Shekar, J. and Singh, C.M. (1991). Influence of methods and dates of stand establishment on growth and yield of rice. Oryza, 28: 45-48.
- Sivakumar, S., Manian, R., Kathirvel, K. and Raghavan, G. (2005). Investigation on the influence of machine and operational parameters for the development of a manually-drawn rice seeder for direct sowing. Agric. Engg. Internat. CIGR Ejournal., 7: 4-8.
- Suryawanshi, S.D. and Prakash, M. (1993). Impact of viable technology of promoting oil seeds in Maharashtra. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 48:420.
- Venkattakumar, R., Ramana Rao, S.V., Padmaiah, M. and Madhuri, P. (2010). Production constraints and information needs of growers in andhra Pradesh, Agric. Extn. Rev., 21-24.
- Anonymous (2008). http://agri.gujarat.gov.in/hods/dire_agriculture/ statistics_crops1949 06.htm.
- Impact of Front Line Demonstrations on Soybean in Tribal Belt of Gujarat
Abstract Views :332 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
2 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat)
1 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
2 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat)
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 587-589Abstract
The study was carried out during Kharif season of 2012 and 2013 in ten villages of Narmada district. In all 27 demonstrations on soybean crop were carried out in area of 10 ha with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the latest technology of soybean production with suitable variety 'JS-335'. The results revealed that FLD recorded higher yield as compared to farmers practice over the years of study. The improved technology recorded average yield of 1666 kg/ha which was 17.8 per cent higher than that obtained with farmers practice of 1415 kg/ha. In spite of increase in yield of soybean, technological gap, extension gap and technology index existed which was 134, 251 kg/ha and 7.4 per cent, respectively. The improved technology gave higher gross return of 51614 Rs./ha, net return of 39386 Rs./ha with benefit cost ratio 4.2 as compared to local check (43846 Rs./ha, 31618 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 3.6, respectively).Keywords
Front Line Demonstrations, Soybean, Tribal Belt.References
- Dhaka, B.L., Meena, B.S. and Suwalka, R.L. (2010). Popularization of improved maize production technology through frontline demonstrations in South-eastern Rajasthan. J. Agric. Sci.,1 (1): 39-42.
- Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2012). Department of Agricultural and Co-operation, Agricultural at a glance 2012, pp. 103.
- Haque, M.S. (2000). Impact of compact block demonstration on increase in productivity of rice. Maharashtra J.Extn. Edu., 19 (1):22-27.
- Hiremath, S. M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2010). Evaluation of onfarm front line demonstrations on the yield of chilli. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23(2): 341-342.
- Jeengar, K.L., Panwar, P. and Pareek, O.P. (2006). Front line demonstration on maize in Bhilwara district of Rajsthan. Curr. Agric., 30(1/2): 115-116.
- Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Yadav, V.P.S. and Kumar, R. (2010). Impact assessment of Frontline Demonstrations of Bajra in Haryana State. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu.,10 (1): 105-108.
- Mishra, D.K., Paliwal, D.K., Tailor, R.S. and Deshwal, A.K. (2009). Impact of frontline demonstrations on yield enhancement of potato. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 9 (3): 26-28 .
- Mukherjee N. (2003). Participatory, learning and action. Concept, Publishing Company, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
- Raj, A.D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Impact of front line demonstrations (FLD) on the yield of pulses. Internat. J. Scientific & Res. Public., 3(9): 1-4.
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.
- Tiwari, R.B., Singh, V. and Parihar, P. (2003). Role of front line demonstration in transfer of gram production technology. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 22 (1): 19.
- Evaluation of Yield of Maize Through Improved Variety
Abstract Views :418 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
1 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 608-610Abstract
The study was carried out during Kharif season of 2011, 2012 and 2013 in seven villages of Narmada district. In all 32 demonstrations on maize crop were carried out in area of 11.6 ha with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the latest technology of maize production potential. The improved technology consisting of suitable variety 'Gujarat Maize 6'. The results revealed that FLD recorded higher yield as compared to farmers practice over the years of study. The improved variety recorded average yield of 1409 kg/ha which was 18.5 per cent higher than that obtained with farmers practice of 1189 kg/ ha. In spite of increase in yield of maize, technological gap, extension gap and technology index existed which was 1034, 219 kg/ha and 42.3 per cent, respectively. The improved variety gave higher gross return of 15030 Rs./ha, net return of 4031 Rs./ha with benefit cost ratio 1.4 as compared to local check (12688 Rs./ha, 2289 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 1.2).Keywords
Front Line Demonstration, Improved Variety, Maize.References
- Balai, C.M., Bairwa, R.K., Roat, B.L. and Meena, B.L. (2013). Impact of front line demonstration on maize yield improvement in tribal belt of Rajasthan. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 4 (3): 369-371.
- Dhaka, B.L., Meena, B.S. and Suwalka, R.L. (2010). Popularisation of improved maize production technology through front line demonstrations in South-Eastern Rajasthan. J. Agric. Sci., 1(1):39-42.
- DOA (2010). Directorate of Agriculture, Gujarat state, Gandhinagar (GUJARAT) INDIA.
- Jeengar, K.L., Panwar, P. and Pareek, O.P. (2006). Front line demonstration on maize in Bhilwara district of Rajsthan, Curr. Agric., 30(1/2): 115-116.
- Mishra, D.K., Paliwal, D.K., Tailor, R.S. and Deshwal, A.K. (2009). Impact of front line demonstration on yield enhancement of potato. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 9 (3): 26-28.
- Mokidue, I., Mohanty, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011). Corelating growth, yield and adoption of urdbean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11(20): 20-24.
- Mukherjee, N. (2003). Participatory, learning and action. Concept, Publishing Company, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
- Raj, A.D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Evaluation of front line demonstrations on the yield of drilled rice (Oryza sativa). Agric. Update, 8 (4): 565-568.
- Rao, P.G.M., Malathi, S.D. Reddy, V.V. and Prasad, V.R. (2013). On farm sustainability of production technologies of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) in Northern Telangana zone of Andhra Pradesh, Internat. J. Appl. Bio- Sci., 1: 20-22.
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.