Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Plant Wnt:Deciphering a Novel Signalling Pathway in Plants


Affiliations
1 Biotechnology Section, ICAR–Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440 010, India
 

Wnt proteins represents highly conserved family of signalling biomolecules regulating vital developmental processes including embryo axis patterning, regeneration potential, cell fate specificity and determination in animals. Existence of Wnt protein mediated signalling in plants is still unexplored. Homologs of proteins like glycogen-synthase-kinase-3, casein-kinase-1 and Adenomatous-polyposis coli which together act as a negative regulator of metazoan Wnt signalling, have been traced in plants. Interestingly, genome-wide survey of cotton could reveal the presence of Wnt protein and its receptor, Frizzled up in Gossypium arboreum. Moreover, publicly available annotated sequence data have unravelled the existence of certain other proteins like Dishevelled homologs of betacatenin in plants. These proteins orchestrate the initiation of Wnt signalling pathway in animals. Manifestation of homologs of such Wnt signalling factors in plants, indicates a possible mimicry of similar signalling pathways. We have attempted to hypothesize a novel signalling network involving Wnt protein and other associated proteins in plants, considering animal systems as a model.

Keywords

Gossypium, Plant Wnt, Wnt Signalling.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Nusse, R. and Varmus, H. E., Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell, 1982, 31, 99–109.

  • Rijsewijk, F. et al., The Drosophila homology of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell, 1987, 50, 649–657.

  • Nusse, R. et al., A new nomenclature for int-1 and related genes: the Wnt gene family. Cell, 1991, 64, 231.

  • Nusse, R. and Varmus, H. E., Wnt genes. Cell, 1992, 69, 1073–1087.

  • Willert, K. et al., Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature, 2003, 423, 448–452.

  • Komiya, Y. and Habas, R., Wnt signal transduction pathways. Organogenesis, 2008, 4, 68–75.

  • Teo, J.-L. and Kahn, M., The Wnt signalling pathway in cellular proliferation and differentiation: a tale of two coactivators. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2010, 62, 1149–1155.

  • Kemp, C. R. et al., The roles of Wnt signalling in early mouse development and embryonic stem cells. Funct. Dev. Embryol., 2007, 1, 1–13.

  • Liu, P. et al., Requirement for Wnt3 in vertebrate axis formation. Nat. Genet., 1999, 22, 361–365.

  • Lindsley, R. C., Gill, J. G., Kyba, M., Murphy, T. L. and Murphy, K. M., Canonical Wnt signalling is required for development of embryonic stem cell-derived mesoderm. Development, 2006, 133, 3787–3796.

  • Mudgil, Y., Shiu, S. H., Stone, S. L., Salt, J. N. and Goring, D. R., A large complement of the predicted Arabidopsis ARM repeat proteins are members of the U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase family. Plant Physiol., 2004, 134, 59–66.

  • Sharma, M. et al., Comprehensive expression analysis of rice Armadillo gene family during abiotic stress and development. DNA Res., 2014, 21, 267–283.

  • Phillips, S. M., Dubery, I. A. and van Heerden, H., Molecular characterization of an elicitor-responsive Armadillo repeat gene (GhARM) from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Mol. Biol. Rep., 2012, 39, 8513–8523.

  • Miki, T., Nishina, M. and Goshima, G., RNAi screening identifies the armadillo repeat-containing kinesins responsible for microtubuledependent nuclear positioning in Physcomitrella patens. Plant Cell Physiol., 2015, 56, 737–749.

  • Miller, J. R. The Wnts. Genome Biol., 2002, 3, REVIEWS3001.

  • Nusse, R. and Varmus, H., Three decades of Wnts: a personal perspective on how a scientific field developed. EMBO J., 2012, 31, 2670–2684.

  • Cadigan, K. M. and Nusse, R., Wnt signalling: a common theme in animal development. Genes Dev., 1997, 11, 3286–3305.

  • Willert, K. and Nusse, R., Wnt proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2012, 4, a007864.

  • Burrus, L. W. and McMahon, A. P., Biochemical analysis of murine Wnt proteins reveals both shared and distinct properties. Exp. Cell Res., 1995, 220, 363–373.

  • Nusse, R., Wnt signalling and stem cell control. Cell Res., 2008, 18, 523–527.

  • Logan, C. Y. and Nusse, R., The Wnt signalling pathway in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2004, 20, 781–810.

  • Bhanot, P. et al., A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature, 1996, 382, 225–230.

  • Malbon, C. C., Frizzleds: new members of the superfamily of Gproteincoupled receptors. Front. Biosci., 2004, 9, 1048–1058.

  • Dann, C. E. et al., Insights into Wnt binding and signalling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains. Nature, 2001, 412, 86–90.

  • Strutt, D., Madder, D., Chaudhary, V. and Artymiuk, P. J., Structurefunction dissection of the frizzled receptor in Drosophila melanogaster suggests different mechanisms of action in planar polarity and canonical Wnt signalling. Genetics, 2012, 192, 1295–1313.

  • Pei, J. and Grishin, N. V., Cysteine-rich domains related to Frizzled receptors and Hedgehog-interacting proteins. Protein Sci., 2012, 21, 1172–1184.

  • Kelly, O. G., Pinson, K. I. and Skarnes, W. C., The Wnt coreceptors Lrp5 and Lrp6 are essential for gastrulation in mice. Development, 2004, 131, 2803–2815.

  • Yanagawa, S., van Leeuwen, F., Wodarz, A., Klingensmith, J. and Nusse, R., The dishevelled protein is modified by wingless signalling in Drosophila. Genes Dev., 1995, 9, 1087–1097.

  • Lee, J. S., Ishimoto, A. and Yanagawa, S., Characterization of mouse dishevelled (Dvl) proteins in Wnt/Wingless signalling pathway. J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274, 21464–21470.

  • Chen, W. et al., Dishevelled 2 recruits beta-arrestin 2 to mediate Wnt5A-stimulated endocytosis of Frizzled 4. Science, 2003, 301, 1391–1394.

  • Wong, H.-C. et al., Direct binding of the PDZ domain of dishevelled to a conserved internal sequence in the C-terminal region of frizzled. Mol. Cell, 2003, 12, 1251–1260.

  • Mao, J. et al., Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signalling pathway. Mol. Cell, 2001, 7, 801–809.

  • He, X., Semenov, M., Tamai, K. and Zeng, X., LDL receptorrelated proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/beta-catenin signalling: arrows point the way. Development, 2004, 131, 1663–1677.

  • Huang, H. and He, X., Wnt/beta-catenin signalling: new (and old) players and new insights. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2008, 20, 119–125.

  • Kimelman, D. and Xu, W., beta-catenin destruction complex: insights and questions from a structural perspective. Oncogene, 2006, 25, 7482–7491.

  • Novak, A. and Dedhar, S., Signaling through beta-catenin and Lef/Tcf. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 1999, 56, 523–537.

  • Cong, F., Schweizer, L., Chamorro, M. and Varmus, H., Requirement for a nuclear function of beta-catenin in Wnt signalling. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2003, 23, 8462–8470.

  • Stamos, J. L. and Weis, W. I., The -catenin destruction complex. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2013, 5, a007898.

  • Wray, J. and Hartmann, C., WNTing embryonic stem cells. Trends Cell Biol., 2012, 22, 159–168.

  • Niehrs, C., The complex world of WNT receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2012, 13, 767–779.

  • Van Amerongen, R. et al., Frat oncoproteins act at the crossroad of canonical and noncanonical Wnt-signalling pathways. Oncogene, 2010, 29, 93–104.

  • Onizuka, T. et al., Wnt2 accelerates cardiac myocyte differentiation from ES-cell derived mesodermal cells via non-canonical pathway. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 2012, 52, 650–659.

  • Gómez-Orte, E., Sáenz-Narciso, B., Moreno, S. and Cabello, J., Multiple functions of the noncanonical Wnt pathway. Trends Genet., 2013, 29, 545–553.

  • Oishi, I. et al., The receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is involved in non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK signalling pathway. Genes Cells, 2003, 8, 645–654.

  • Sato, A., Yamamoto, H., Sakane, H., Koyama, H. and Kikuchi, A., Wnt5a regulates distinct signalling pathways by binding to Frizzled2. EMBO J., 2009, 29, 41–54.

  • Jansson, L., Kim, G. S. and Cheng, A. G., Making sense of Wnt signalling-linking hair cell regeneration to development. Front. Cell. Neurosci., 2015, 9, 66.

  • Hogan, P. G., Chen, L., Nardone, J. and Rao, A., Transcriptional regulation by calcium, calcineurin, and NFAT. Genes Dev., 2003, 17, 2205–2232.

  • Huang, T. et al., Nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) proteins repress canonical Wnt signalling via its interaction with Dishevelled (Dvl) protein and participate in regulating neural progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. J. Biol. Chem., 2011, 286, 37399–373405.

  • Cohen, E. D., Tian, Y. and Morrisey, E. E., Wnt signalling: an essential regulator of cardiovascular differentiation, morphogenesis and progenitor self-renewal. Development, 2008, 135, 789–798.

  • Flentke, G. R., Garic, A., Hernandez, M. and Smith, S. M., CaMKII represses transcriptionally active β-catenin to mediate acute ethanol neurodegeneration and can phosphorylate β-catenin. J. Neurochem., 2014, 128, 523–535.

  • Gwak, J. et al., Protein-kinase-C-mediated beta-catenin phosphorylation negatively regulates the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. J. Cell Sci., 2006, 119, 4702–4709.

  • McCrea, P. D., Turck, C. W. and Gumbiner, B., A homolog of the armadillo protein in Drosophila (plakoglobin) associated with Ecadherin. Science, 1991, 254, 1359–1361.

  • Willert, K. and Nusse, R., Beta-catenin: a key mediator of Wnt signalling. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 1998, 8, 95–102.

  • Sharma, M., Pandey, A. and Pandey, G. K., β-Catenin in plants and animals: common players but different pathways. Front. Plant Sci., 2014, 5, 143.

  • Huber, A. H., Nelson, W. J. and Weis, W. I., Three-dimensional structure of the armadillo repeat region of beta-catenin. Cell, 1997, 90, 871–882.

  • Tewari, R., Bailes, E., Bunting, K. A. and Coates, J. C., Armadillorepeat protein functions: questions for little creatures. Trends Cell Biol., 2010, 20, 470–481.

  • Coates, J. C., Armadillo repeat proteins: beyond the animal kingdom. Trends Cell Biol., 2003, 13, 463–471.

  • Ngo, Q. A. et al., The Armadillo repeat gene ZAK IXIK promotes Arabidopsis early embryo and endosperm development through a distinctive gametophytic maternal effect. Plant Cell, 2012, 24, 4026–4043.

  • Mudgil, Y., Shiu, S.-H., Stone, S. L., Salt, J. N. and Goring, D. R., A large complement of the predicted Arabidopsis ARM repeat proteins are members of the U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase family. Plant Physiol., 2004, 134, 59–66.

  • Sharma, M. et al., Comprehensive expression analysis of rice Armadillo gene family during abiotic stress and development. DNA Res., 2014, 21, 267–283.

  • Li, J., Nam, K. H., Vafeados, D. and Chory, J., BIN2, a new brassinosteroidinsensitive locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol., 2001, 127, 14–22.

  • Kim, T.-W. et al., Brassinosteroid signal transduction from cellsurface receptor kinases to nuclear transcription factors. Nat. Cell Biol., 2009, 11, 1254–1260.

  • Jonak, C. and Hirt, H., Glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinases in plants: an emerging family with novel functions. Trends Plant Sci., 2002, 7, 457–461.

  • Vert, G. and Chory, J., Downstream nuclear events in brassinosteroid signalling. Nature, 2006, 441, 96–100.

  • De Rybel, B. et al., Chemical inhibition of a subset of Arabidopsis thaliana GSK3-like kinases activates brassinosteroid signalling. Chem. Biol., 2009, 16, 594–604.

  • Li, J. and Nam, K. H., Regulation of brassinosteroid signalling by a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase. Science, 2002, 295, 1299–1301.

  • Yan, Z., Zhao, J., Peng, P., Chihara, R. K. and Li, J., BIN2 functions redundantly with other Arabidopsis GSK3-like kinases to regulate brassinosteroid signalling. Plant Physiol., 2009, 150, 710–721.

  • Youn, J.-H. and Kim, T.-W., Functional insights of plant GSK3-like kinases: multi-taskers in diverse cellular signal transduction pathways. Mol. Plant, 2015, 8, 552–565.

  • Yin, Y. et al., BES1 accumulates in the nucleus in response to brassinosteroids to regulate gene expression and promote stem elongation. Cell, 2002, 109, 181–191.

  • Yu, X. et al., A brassinosteroid transcriptional network revealed by genome-wide identification of BESI target genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J., 2011, 65, 634–646.

  • Zhu, J.-Y., Sae-Seaw, J. and Wang, Z.-Y., Brassinosteroid signalling. Development, 2013, 140, 1615–1620.

  • Hu, Y., Bao, F. and Li, J., Promotive effect of brassinosteroids on cell division involves a distinct CycD3-induction pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J., 2000, 24, 693–701.

  • Yamamoto, R. et al., Co-regulation of brassinosteroid biosynthesisrelated genes during xylem cell differentiation. Plant Cell Physiol., 2007, 48, 74–83.

  • Lange, C., Mix, E., Rateitschak, K. and Rolfs, A., Wnt signal pathways and neural stem cell differentiation. Neurodegener. Dis., 2006, 3, 76–86.

  • Habib, S. J. et al., A localized Wnt signal orients asymmetric stem cell division in vitro. Science, 2013, 339, 1445–1448.

  • Reya, T. et al., A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature, 2003, 423, 409–414.

  • Nygren, M. K. et al., Wnt3A activates canonical Wnt signalling in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cells and inhibits the proliferation of B-ALL cell lines. Br. J. Haematol., 2007, 136, 400–413.

  • Van Amerongen, R. and Nusse, R., Towards an integrated view of Wnt signalling in development. Development, 2009, 136, 3205–3214.

  • Grumolato, L. et al., Canonical and noncanonical Wnts use a common mechanism to activate completely unrelated coreceptors. Genes Dev., 2010, 24, 2517–2530.

  • Tu, X. et al., Noncanonical Wnt signalling through G proteinlinked PKCdelta activation promotes bone formation. Dev. Cell, 2007, 12, 113–127.

  • Qiu, W., Chen, L. and Kassem, M., Activation of non-canonical Wnt/JNK pathway by Wnt3a is associated with differentiation fate determination of human bone marrow stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2011, 413, 98–104.

  • Aydin, Y., Talas-Ogras, T., Ipekci-Altas, Z. and Gozukirmizi, N., Effects of brassinosteroid on cotton regeneration via somatic embryogenesis. Biologia (Bratisl), 2006, 61(3), 289–293.

  • Sun, Y., Fokar, M., Asami, T., Yoshida, S. and Allen, R. D., Characterization of the brassinosteroid insensitive 1 genes of cotton. Plant Mol. Biol., 2004, 54, 221–232.

  • Sun, Y. et al., Brassinosteroid regulates fiber development on cultured cotton ovules. Plant Cell Physiol., 2005, 46, 1384–1391.


Abstract Views: 285

PDF Views: 83




  • Plant Wnt:Deciphering a Novel Signalling Pathway in Plants

Abstract Views: 285  |  PDF Views: 83

Authors

Joy Das
Biotechnology Section, ICAR–Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440 010, India
Rakesh Kumar
Biotechnology Section, ICAR–Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440 010, India

Abstract


Wnt proteins represents highly conserved family of signalling biomolecules regulating vital developmental processes including embryo axis patterning, regeneration potential, cell fate specificity and determination in animals. Existence of Wnt protein mediated signalling in plants is still unexplored. Homologs of proteins like glycogen-synthase-kinase-3, casein-kinase-1 and Adenomatous-polyposis coli which together act as a negative regulator of metazoan Wnt signalling, have been traced in plants. Interestingly, genome-wide survey of cotton could reveal the presence of Wnt protein and its receptor, Frizzled up in Gossypium arboreum. Moreover, publicly available annotated sequence data have unravelled the existence of certain other proteins like Dishevelled homologs of betacatenin in plants. These proteins orchestrate the initiation of Wnt signalling pathway in animals. Manifestation of homologs of such Wnt signalling factors in plants, indicates a possible mimicry of similar signalling pathways. We have attempted to hypothesize a novel signalling network involving Wnt protein and other associated proteins in plants, considering animal systems as a model.

Keywords


Gossypium, Plant Wnt, Wnt Signalling.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv111%2Fi8%2F1319-1324