Open Access
Subscription Access
Advantages and Disadvantages of National and International Corporate Training Techniques in Adult Education
Significant changes in various spheres of life along with the dynamic growth of industrial capacity and complexity have contributed to the increasing importance of corporate training issues in adult and continuing education. Here, we identify the benefits and difficulties encountered in both national and international techniques of training the human resource in enterprises, under modern conditions. The leading method in this challenge was a comparative-and-contrastive method that allowed us to identify advantages and disadvantages, of national and international techniques of corporate education. Our study also disclosed the contents, peculiarities and difficulties in the use of corporate training methods like distance and modular learning; video and case study; business games, metaphorical games, role-playing games; brainstorming, projects, behavioural modelling, mentoring, learning-by-doing, working groups, basket method, training sessions, storytelling, rotation, secondment and buddying. Selecting the proper corporate training method or technique, depends on specific nature of industries and business, and the country's development level. Our study hopes to help managers, mentors in enterprises, and trainers who are engaged in in-house training of specialists to do their jobs better.
Keywords
Advantages and Disadvantages, Corporate Training, Enterprises, National and International Techniques.
User
Font Size
Information
- Klucharev, G. A. and Pakhomova, H. I., Corporate education: alternative government programs in additional education. J. Contin. Edu. Polit. Econ., 2008, 3, 134–160.
- Masalimova, A. R. and Sabirova, L. L., Multi-dimensional classification of types and forms of corporate education. Am. J. Appl. Sci., 2014, 11, 1054–1058.
- Shurkina, E. Y. et al., Designing a model of interaction of economic resources in the quantization conditions of economic area. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., 2015, 6, 129–135.
- Manheim, J., Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence, Oxford University Press, USA, 1994, 1st edn.
- Kram, K. E., Phases of the mentor relationship. Aсad. Manage. J., 1983, 26, 608–625.
- Plotnikov, A. and Skuridina, I. V., Corporate culture and sociopsychological climate of the organization. Life Sci. J., 2014, 11, 548–553.
- Masalimova, A. R., Corporate Education in Russia and Abroad, Saarbrucken, Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co.KG, 2012.
- Mousavi, Z., Beiranvand, F., Moeinfar, Z. and Amouzesh, N., Corporate social responsibility. Life Sci. J., 2013, 10, 8–10.
- Vedishenkova, M. V., Efimova, E. V. and Ryabova, E. V., Student’s research work as the condition of continuity of general and professional education. Int. J. Env. Sci. Educ., 2015, 10, 533–542.
- Bolshakova, G. K. USA: The Role of Corporations and the State in Training, Moscow: Nauka, 1987.
- Bogaevskaya, O., American corporations: mechanisms of securing leadership in global economy. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, p. 94.
- Shaidullina, A. R. et al., The curriculum project on professional and pedagogical teachers’ communication culture formation. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., 2015, 6, 202–208.
Abstract Views: 440
PDF Views: 114