Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Nuclear Power from Thorium:Different Options


Affiliations
1 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
 

Thorium is a fertile material that has drawn attention as a potential source of nuclear energy since the 1950s due to several attractive features of the Th-U233 fuel cycle. In view of the renewed interest in thorium, the possibilities of thorium utilization in different reactor systems, namely pressurized heavy water reactors (PHWRs), light water reactors, molten salt breeder reactors (MSBRs), fast reactors and accelerator-driven sub-critical systems have been examined. Extraction of energy from thorium essentially requires prior conversion of thorium to fissile U233. For in situ burning of thorium, a high burn-up is therefore essential. It is shown that the use of thorium in currently deployed PHWRs will reduce the requirement of uranium by about 30% in once through fuel cycle, while MSBRs with closed fuel cycle can achieve near breeding capability in thermal reactors. The most effective thorium utilization can be achieved only by adopting a closed fuel cycle which will not only enhance the fissile inventory many fold but also reduce nuclear waste burden significantly. While in conventional fast breeder reactors, thorium, partly converted into U233 in the blanket region, is reprocessed for the recovery of the fissile material; in the breed and burn concept, the converted material is transferred to the core region without any reprocessing. Availability of spallation neutrons produced by bombardments of high-energy protons on heavy nuclides can augment fertile to fissile conversion leading to thorium utilization. The various options, which appear technologically feasible for generating power from thorium and the key issues connected with these schemes, are discussed in this article.

Keywords

Accelerator-Driven Sub-Critical Systems, Breed and Burn Reactors, Fast Reactors, Light Water Reactors, Molten Salt Breeder Reactors, Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors, Thorium Fuel Cycle.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Boczar, P. G. et al., Thorium fuel cycle studies for CANDU reactors, IAEA-TECDOC-2002, 1319, p. 25.
  • Sivasubramanin, S., Lee, S. M. and Bhardwaj, S. A., Current status and future possibilities of thorium utilization in PHWRs and FBRs, Annual Conference of Indian Nuclear Society (INSAC-2000) on Power from Thorium status, strategies and direction, 1–2 June 2000, Mumbai, India.
  • Introduction of thorium in nuclear fuel cycle, Short to long term considerations, NEA no. 7224, 2015, Nuclear Science, OECD.
  • Gupta, H. P., Menon, S. V. G. and Banerjee, S., Advance fuel cycles for use in PHWRs. J. Nucl. Mater., 2008, 383, 54–62.
  • Wattal, P. K., Recycling challenges of thorium based fuel, International Thorium Energy Conference, (IThEC-13), Cern, Geneva, 27–31 October 2013.
  • Rajora, A. et al., Generating one group cross–section for isotope depletion and generation calculation for thorium. A paper accepted for presentation in International Thorium Energy Conference (ThEC-2015), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India, 12–15 October 2015.
  • Olson, G. L. et al., Fuel summary report – Shippingport light water breeder reactor, INEEL/EXT-98-00799, Rev.-2, September 2002.
  • Lewis, W. B., The super-converter or value breeder, A near breeder uranium-thorium nuclear fuel cycle, AECL-3081, 1968.
  • Briant, R. C. and Weinberg, A. M., Molten fluorides as power reactor fuels. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 1958, 2, 797–803.
  • Lewis, W. B., The intense neutron generator and future factory type ion accelerators, AECL-3190, 1968.
  • Rubbia, Carlo et al., Conceptual design of a fast neutron operated high power amplifier, CERN/AT/95-44(ET), 1995.
  • Boczar, P. G. et al., Recent advances in thorium fuel cycles in CANDU reactors, IAEA-TECDOC-1319, 2002, p. 104.
  • Krishnani, P. D. and Srinivasan, K. R., A method for solving integral transport equation for PHWR cluster geometry. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 1981, 78, 97.
  • Askew, J. R., Fayers, F. J. and Kemshell, P. B., A general description of the lattice code WIMS. J. Br. Nucl. Energy Soc., 1966, 5, 564.
  • Gupta, H. P., Use of thorium in PHWRs, National Conference on Power from Thorium: Present status and future directions, Mumbai, 22–24 December 2014.
  • Gupta, H. P., Yadav, R. D. S., Menon, S. V. G. and Banerjee, S., Utilization of Thorium in Different Reactors, German Annual Meeting of Nuclear Technology, 2009 Dresden, 12–14 May 2009.
  • Balakrishnan, K., Optimization of initial fuel loading of the Indian PHWR with thorium bundles for achieving full power. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 1994, 21(1), p. 1–9.
  • Banerjee, S. and Govindan Kutty, T. R., Materials Challenges for Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle, A paper presented in Global 2013: International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 29 September–3 October 2013.
  • Balakrishnan, K., Majumdar, S., Ramanujam, A. and Kakodkar, A., The Indian Perspective on Thorium Fuel Cycles, IAEA-TECDOC1319, 2002, p. 257.
  • Arvind Kumar, Srivenkatesan, R. and Sinha, R. K., On the physics design of advanced heavy water reactor (AHWR), IAEA-CN-164-3S03, 2010, International Conference on Opportunities and Challenges for water cooled reactors in 21st century, Vienna, 27–30 October 2009.
  • Sinha, R. K. and Kakodkar, A., Design and development of AHWR – The Indian thorium fuelled innovative nuclear reactor. Nucl. Eng. Design, 2006, 236, 683–700.
  • Balakrishnan, K. and Kakodkar, A., Preliminary physics design of advanced heavy water reactor (AHWR), IAEA-TECDOC-638, March 1990.
  • Thakur, Amit et al., Fuel cycle flexibility in advanced heavy water reactor (AHWR) with the use of Th–LEU fuel, International Conference on Future of HWRs, Ottawa, Canada, 2–5 October 2011.
  • Christopher Grove, Comparison of thorium and uranium fuel cycles, National Nuclear Laboratory, UK, 2012, NNL(11), 11593(5), 9.
  • Radkowsky, A competitive thorium fuel cycle for pressurised water reactors of current technology, IAEA-TECDOC-1319, 2002, p. 25.
  • Ramanna, R. and Lee, S. M., The thorium cycle for fast breeder reactors. Pramana – J. Phys., 1986, 27(1&2), 129–157.
  • Mohapatra, D. K. et al., Physics aspects of metal fuelled fast reactors with thorium in blanket. Nucl. Eng. Design, 2013, 265, 1232–1237.
  • Greenspan, E., A phased development of breed and burn reactors for enhanced nuclear energy sustainability. Sustainability, 2012, 4, 2745–2764; doi:10.3390/su4102745
  • Petrosky, R. C., General analysis of breed and burn reactors and limited separations fuel cycles, Ph D thesis, MIT, 2011.
  • Sekimoto, H. and Ryu, K., Demonstrating the feasibility of the CANDLE burnup scheme for fast reactors. Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 2000, 83, 45.
  • Kasten, P. R. et al., Summary of molten salt breeder reactor design studies, ORNL-TM-1467, March 1966.
  • Roberson, R. C., Conceptual design study of single-fluid molten-salt breeder reactor, ORNL–4541, June 1971.
  • Hirakawa, N. et al., Molten salt reactor benchmark problem to constrain plutonium, IAEA-TECDOC-1319, 2002, p. 25.
  • Trans Atomic Power, Molten Salt Reactors, Technical White Paper, V 1.0.1, March 2014.
  • Gupta, H. P., Preliminary design of molten salt converter reactor, Conference on Molten Salt Nuclear Technology (CMSNT), BARC, Mumbai, India, January 2013.
  • Kapoor, S. S., Accelerator-driven sub-critical reactor system (ADS) for nuclear energy generation. Pramana – J. Phys., 2002, 59(6), 941–950.
  • Degweker, S. B. et al., Accelerator driven subcritical systems with enhanced neutron multiplication. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 1999, 26, 123.

Abstract Views: 305

PDF Views: 105




  • Nuclear Power from Thorium:Different Options

Abstract Views: 305  |  PDF Views: 105

Authors

S. Banerjee
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
H. P. Gupta
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
S. A. Bhardwaj
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India

Abstract


Thorium is a fertile material that has drawn attention as a potential source of nuclear energy since the 1950s due to several attractive features of the Th-U233 fuel cycle. In view of the renewed interest in thorium, the possibilities of thorium utilization in different reactor systems, namely pressurized heavy water reactors (PHWRs), light water reactors, molten salt breeder reactors (MSBRs), fast reactors and accelerator-driven sub-critical systems have been examined. Extraction of energy from thorium essentially requires prior conversion of thorium to fissile U233. For in situ burning of thorium, a high burn-up is therefore essential. It is shown that the use of thorium in currently deployed PHWRs will reduce the requirement of uranium by about 30% in once through fuel cycle, while MSBRs with closed fuel cycle can achieve near breeding capability in thermal reactors. The most effective thorium utilization can be achieved only by adopting a closed fuel cycle which will not only enhance the fissile inventory many fold but also reduce nuclear waste burden significantly. While in conventional fast breeder reactors, thorium, partly converted into U233 in the blanket region, is reprocessed for the recovery of the fissile material; in the breed and burn concept, the converted material is transferred to the core region without any reprocessing. Availability of spallation neutrons produced by bombardments of high-energy protons on heavy nuclides can augment fertile to fissile conversion leading to thorium utilization. The various options, which appear technologically feasible for generating power from thorium and the key issues connected with these schemes, are discussed in this article.

Keywords


Accelerator-Driven Sub-Critical Systems, Breed and Burn Reactors, Fast Reactors, Light Water Reactors, Molten Salt Breeder Reactors, Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors, Thorium Fuel Cycle.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv111%2Fi10%2F1607-1623