Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Soil Erosion in Punjab


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Chandigarh 160 019, India
2 National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, IARI Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
3 National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Amravati Road, Nagpur 440 033, India
4 Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-I, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
 

Soil erosion map of Punjab highlights the degree of soil erosion caused by water in the state. The values of soil loss per annum from each grid location were quantified using universal soil loss equation (USLE) and used in GIS for preparing the soil erosion map of Punjab state. About 87% of the total geographical area of Punjab has annual soil loss below 5 Mg ha-1 and does not require specific soil conservation measures. About 4.02% of the area is affected by annual soil loss of >15 Mg ha-1, which includes moderately severe (0.88%), severe (1.72%) and very severe (1.42%) soil loss @ 15 to 20, 20 to 40 and 40 to 80 Mg ha-1 respectively. This necessitates the development of improved technologies (conservation agricultural practices, contour bunding, contour cultivation, etc.), which need to be adopted for improving the productivity on a sustainable basis.

Keywords

Conservation Planning, Punjab, Soil Loss, Universal Soil Loss Equation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Oldeman, L. R., Global extent of soil degradation. Bi-annual Report. ISRIC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1991, pp. 19–35.

  • Scherr, S. J. and Yadav, S., Land degradation in the developing world: implications for food, agriculture, and the environment to 2020, Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper, 1996.

  • Maji, A. K., Assessment of degraded and wastelands of India. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 2007, 4955(4), 427–435.

  • Sharda, V. N. and Dogra, P., Assessment of productivity and monetary losses due to water erosion in rainfed crops across different states of India for prioritization and conservation planning. Agric. Res., 2013, 2(4), 382–392.

  • Sharda, V. N., Dogra, P. and Prakash, C., Assessment of production losses due to water erosion in rainfed areas of India. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2010, 65(2), 79–91.

  • Singh, G., Ram Babu, Bhusan, L. S. and Abrol, I. P., Soil erosion rates in India. J. Soil Water Conserv., 1992, 47, 97–99.

  • Velayutham, M. and Bhattacharyya, T., Soil resource management. In Natural Resource Management for Agricultural Production in India (eds Yadav, J. S. P. and Singh, G. B.), 2000, pp. 1–137.

  • Kurothe, R. S., Batta, R. K. and Sharma, J. P., Soil erosion map of Gujarat. Indian J. Soil Conserv., 1997, 25, 9–13.

  • Kurothe, R. S., Challa, O., Samra, J. S. and Velayutham, M., Assessment of soil erosion in Maharashtra. Indian J. Soil Conserv., 2001, 29, 133–137.

  • Sikka, A. K. et al., Soil erosion map of Kerala state. Indian J. Soil Conserv.., 2003, 31, 127–130.

  • Yadav, R. P. and Sachdev, C. B., Assessment of soil erosion in Haryana state. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 2008, 56, 99–105.

  • Yadav, R. P. and Sidhu, G. S., Assessment of soil erosion in Himachal Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 2010, 58, 212–220.

  • Sur, H. S., Singh, R. and Malhi, S. S., Influence of simulated erosion on soil properties and maize yield in north western India. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 1998, 29(17–18), 2647–2658.

  • Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D., Predicting rainfall erosion losses – a guide for conservation planning. Agriculture Hand book No. 537, USDA, Washington, DC, 1978, p. 58.

  • Wischmeier, W. H. and Mannering, J. V., Relation of soil properties to its erodibility. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 1969, 33, 131–137.

  • Ram Babu, Tejwani, K. G., Agarwal, M. C. and Subhash Chandra, Rainfall erosion potential and iso-erodent map of India. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Dehradun, Bulletin No. 2. p. 47, 1978.

  • Renard, K. G., Laften, J. M., Foster, G. R. and Mc Cool, D. K., The revised soil loss equation. In Soil Erosion – Research Methods (ed. Lal, R.), Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny (USA), 1994, pp. 105–124.

  • Sidhu, G. S., Walia, C. S., Lal, Tarsem, Rana, K. P. C. and Sehgal, J., Soils of Punjab for Optimizing Land Use, NBSS Publ. 45 (Soils of India Series). National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, 1995, p. 75.

  • Anon., District-wise Area and Production of Crops, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, 1998–99.

  • Singh, G., Ram Babu and Subhash Chandra, Soil Loss Prediction Research in India. ICAR Bulletin No. T-12/ D-9. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Dehradun, 1981, p. 70.


Abstract Views: 770

PDF Views: 155




  • Soil Erosion in Punjab

Abstract Views: 770  |  PDF Views: 155

Authors

Sharmistha Pal
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Chandigarh 160 019, India
G. S. Sidhu
National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, IARI Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
A. K. Tiwari
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Chandigarh 160 019, India
Dipak Sarkar
National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Amravati Road, Nagpur 440 033, India
V. N. Sharda
Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-I, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


Soil erosion map of Punjab highlights the degree of soil erosion caused by water in the state. The values of soil loss per annum from each grid location were quantified using universal soil loss equation (USLE) and used in GIS for preparing the soil erosion map of Punjab state. About 87% of the total geographical area of Punjab has annual soil loss below 5 Mg ha-1 and does not require specific soil conservation measures. About 4.02% of the area is affected by annual soil loss of >15 Mg ha-1, which includes moderately severe (0.88%), severe (1.72%) and very severe (1.42%) soil loss @ 15 to 20, 20 to 40 and 40 to 80 Mg ha-1 respectively. This necessitates the development of improved technologies (conservation agricultural practices, contour bunding, contour cultivation, etc.), which need to be adopted for improving the productivity on a sustainable basis.

Keywords


Conservation Planning, Punjab, Soil Loss, Universal Soil Loss Equation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv111%2Fi10%2F1687-1693