Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Paris Climate Change Agreement and After


Affiliations
1 Azim Premji University, 10th Floor, Pixel Park, A-Block, PES Campus, Electronics City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560 100, India
 

In a turn towards pragmatism the Paris Climate Change Agreement, concluded in December 2015, adopted a markedly different architecture for global climate governance. It remains to be seen if pragmatism produces effectiveness. However, in lieu of the approach under the Kyoto Protocol, where binding emission reduction targets for Annex 1 Parties (broadly, the industrialized countries) to the Protocol were arrived at by a formula, the Paris Agreement records Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) arrived at independently by the Parties and submitted to the United Nations.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • United States Senate Resolution 98, 105th Congress (1997–1998); https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/senate-resolution/98 (retrieved 14 November 2016).

  • Levin, K. and Fransen, T.; http://www.wri.org/blog/2015/11/insider-why-are-indcstudiesreachingdifferent-temperature-estimates (retrieved 6 December 2016).

  • UNEP, The Emissions Gap Report 2016. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 2016.

  • http://www4.unfccc.int/ndcregistry/PublishedDocuments/ India%20First/INDIA%-20INDC%20TO%20UNFCCC.pdf (retrieved 17 February 2017).

  • McNeill, J. R., Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World, W. W. Norton & Company, 2000.


Abstract Views: 279

PDF Views: 95




  • The Paris Climate Change Agreement and After

Abstract Views: 279  |  PDF Views: 95

Authors

Manu V. Mathai
Azim Premji University, 10th Floor, Pixel Park, A-Block, PES Campus, Electronics City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560 100, India
P. S. Narayan
Azim Premji University, 10th Floor, Pixel Park, A-Block, PES Campus, Electronics City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560 100, India

Abstract


In a turn towards pragmatism the Paris Climate Change Agreement, concluded in December 2015, adopted a markedly different architecture for global climate governance. It remains to be seen if pragmatism produces effectiveness. However, in lieu of the approach under the Kyoto Protocol, where binding emission reduction targets for Annex 1 Parties (broadly, the industrialized countries) to the Protocol were arrived at by a formula, the Paris Agreement records Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) arrived at independently by the Parties and submitted to the United Nations.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi06%2F1099-1100