Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Chemistry Research in India:Making Progress, but not Rapidly


Affiliations
1 DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
2 Knowledge Resources Centre, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 003, India
 

Against the backdrop of comments on chemistry research in India made in three recent reports prepared by Nature Index, Elsevier and Thomson Reuters, we have made a scientometric analysis of contributions from India in leading multidisciplinary chemistry journals over the 25-year period 1991-2015. We have compared India's performance with that of China as a benchmark. Overall, the number of chemistry papers from India increased steadily between 2007 and 2014. The threeyear moving average of number of papers during the period grew at a compound annual growth rate of 8.9%, and the overall increase in papers was accompanied by a more than proportionate increase in the leading journals. Also, the average number of cites received by papers with at least one author from India in Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.) and Accounts of Chemical Research was higher than the world average. Despite its huge share of the world's population (~17%), India continues to be poorly represented in the top journals: the country's share of papers in the Journal of the American Chemical Society is 0.7% compared to 58.4% for USA, 7.6% for Germany and 5.1% for China, and its share in Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. is 1.2% compared to 28% for Germany, 25.3% for USA and 9.9% for China. This could be due to the fact that till recently Indian universities did not encourage mobility across disciplines. That only a small number of Indian researchers and institutions publish in leading journals is also a matter for concern. India accounts for only a small number of papers in the top one percentile of the most highly cited chemistry papers, whereas China leads the world. Only 2.3% of the 2234 papers published in 2014 that are in the top one percentile is from India compared to 38% from China.

Keywords

Chemistry Research, International Collaboration, Multidisciplinary Journals, Scientometric Analysis.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Arunan, E., Brakaspathy, R., Desiraju, G. R. and Sivaram, S., Chemistry in India: unlocking the potential. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 114–117; doi:10.1002/anie.201206960.

  • Kogleck, L., Priyadarshini, S., Pincock, S., Bocquet, A. and Gilloch, C., Indian Science Ascending – A Nature Index Analysis, Springer Nature, 2015; https://www.natureindex.com/pdf/news/ indian-science-ascending.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Phillips, N., Rising stars. Nature, 2016, 535, S49; doi:10.1038/ 535S49a.

  • Nature Index, 2013 tables: countries – chemistry; http://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2013/country/chemistry (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Nature Index, 2016 tables: countries – chemistry; http://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2016/country/chemistry (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Huggett, S., Gurney, T. and Jumelet, A., International comparative performance of India’s research base (2009–14): a bibliometric analysis by Elsevier. Department of Science and Technology (DST), India, 2016; http://nstmis-dst.org/PDF/Elsevier.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Huggett, S., Gurney, T. and Jumelet, A., International comparative performance of India’s research base (2009–14): a bibliometric analysis by Elsevier, DST, India, 2015.

  • India’s research output and collaboration (2005–14): a bibliometric study (phase-II), by Thomson Reuters, DST, India, 2015; http://nstmis-dst.org/PDF/Thomson.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Ray, P. C., On the conjugated sulphates of the copper–magnesium group, Proc. R. Soc Edinburg, 1889, 15, 267–283; doi:10.1017/ S0370164600005502.

  • Dhar, N., Dissociation constant of weak acids and bases from solubility data. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1913, 35, 800–802; doi: 10.1021/ ja02195a019.

  • Srikantan, B. S. and Rengachari, S., Verwertung von Unkraut, I.Vergasung der Feigendistel (Opuntia Dillinii), Angew. Chem., 1937, 50, 249–250; doi:10.1002/ange.19370501304.

  • Palit, S. R., End group estimation in polymer compounds using dyes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1962, 1, 603; doi: 10.1002/anie.196206031.

  • Wiberg, N., Vasisht, S. K. and Fischer, G., Bis(trimethylgermyl) diimine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1976, 15, 236–237; doi:10.1002/anie.197602361.

  • Arunachalam, S. and Madhan, M., Adopting ORCID as a unique identifier will benefit all involved in scholarly communication. Natl. Med. J. India, 2016, 29(4), 227–234.

  • Science (journal): history; http://america.pink/science-journal_ 3946247.html (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Interview with Dr Peter Goelitz, Editor-in-chief of Angewandte Chemie, CHEMCOS, 2014; http://chemistry.iitd.ac.in/chemcos/ chemcos/present%20issue/9%20Personalities.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • India’s performance in research is impressive in recent years says Dr Harsh Vardhan, Minister for Science & Technology and Earth Sciences, Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, 2016; http://pib.nic.in/newsite/ PrintRelease.aspx?relid=137602 (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Feng, D. H., Opening comment to 2007–2009 Taiwan – Israel Joint Final Report Workshop, Huaren E-Magazine, 2009; http://www.huaren.org/Text/uploadedFiles/1259274908902-8521.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Balaram, P., Rankings and records. Curr. Sci., 2003, 84, 1279– 1280; http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/may252003/1279.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Desiraju, G. R., Science in a changing world. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5590–5591; doi:10.1002/anie.201102495.

  • Vale, R. D. and Dell, K., Aiming high for the future. J. Cell Biol., 2009, 184, 342–353; doi: 10.1083/jcb.200812123.

  • Research fronts 2014: 100 top ranked specialties in the sciences and social sciences. The National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Thomson Reuters IP & Science, 2014; http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/researchfronts2014.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Science and research today: highlights of the OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard. OECD, 2015; http://www.oecdorg/ sti/Science-brief-scoreboard.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Van Noorden, R., China by the numbers: research capacity has grown rapidly, and now quality is on the rise. Nature, 2016, 534, 452–453; http://www.nature.com/news/china-by-the-numbers1.20122 (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Balaram, P., Chemists and chemistry, Curr. Sci., 2011, 100, 5–6; http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/100/01/0005.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2016).

  • Balaram, P., Where has chemistry gone? Curr. Sci., 2000, 79, 927–928.

  • Top 100 chemists, 2000–2010: special report on high-impact chemists, Science Watch, 2011; http://archive.sciencewatch.com/ dr/sci/misc/Top100Chemists2000-10/ (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Ganesh, K. N., Connect research with education. Nature, 2015, 521, 154; http://www.nature.com/news/research-managementprioritiesfor-science-in-india-1.17509#/ganesh (accessed on 5 August 2016).

  • Desiraju, G. R., Science education and research in India, Econ.Polit. Wkly, 2008, 43, 37–43; http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 40277564 (accessed on 1 September 2016).


Abstract Views: 377

PDF Views: 139




  • Chemistry Research in India:Making Progress, but not Rapidly

Abstract Views: 377  |  PDF Views: 139

Authors

Subbiah Arunachalam
DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Muthu Madhan
DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Subbiah Gunasekaran
Knowledge Resources Centre, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 003, India

Abstract


Against the backdrop of comments on chemistry research in India made in three recent reports prepared by Nature Index, Elsevier and Thomson Reuters, we have made a scientometric analysis of contributions from India in leading multidisciplinary chemistry journals over the 25-year period 1991-2015. We have compared India's performance with that of China as a benchmark. Overall, the number of chemistry papers from India increased steadily between 2007 and 2014. The threeyear moving average of number of papers during the period grew at a compound annual growth rate of 8.9%, and the overall increase in papers was accompanied by a more than proportionate increase in the leading journals. Also, the average number of cites received by papers with at least one author from India in Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.) and Accounts of Chemical Research was higher than the world average. Despite its huge share of the world's population (~17%), India continues to be poorly represented in the top journals: the country's share of papers in the Journal of the American Chemical Society is 0.7% compared to 58.4% for USA, 7.6% for Germany and 5.1% for China, and its share in Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. is 1.2% compared to 28% for Germany, 25.3% for USA and 9.9% for China. This could be due to the fact that till recently Indian universities did not encourage mobility across disciplines. That only a small number of Indian researchers and institutions publish in leading journals is also a matter for concern. India accounts for only a small number of papers in the top one percentile of the most highly cited chemistry papers, whereas China leads the world. Only 2.3% of the 2234 papers published in 2014 that are in the top one percentile is from India compared to 38% from China.

Keywords


Chemistry Research, International Collaboration, Multidisciplinary Journals, Scientometric Analysis.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi07%2F1330-1339