Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Analysis of Asian Main Iron and Steel Countries' Total Factor Energy Efficiency


Affiliations
1 Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, No. 30, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
 

This article evaluates the total factor energy efficiency, energy conservation potential and emission reduction potential of the typical enterprises in the main iron and steel-producing countries such as China, India, Japan and Korea by applying the SBM-desirable DEA model and the SBM-undesirable DEA model. The findings are beneficial for understanding the development status of the main Asian iron and steel-producing countries. The empirical results indicate that the Chinese iron and steel enterprises in the sample made great progress in terms of the total factor energy efficiency. Korea's POSCO and Japan's JFE Group and Nippon Steel enterprise performed the best in terms of energy efficiency, energy conservation and emission reduction. The total factor energy efficiency value of India's Tata Steel is comparatively well. It has completed Jamshedpur Works' brownfield expansion project, which help it add eco-efficient products to its portfolio while using fewer natural resources, less energy and less water per tonne of steel produced.

Keywords

Iron and Steel Enterprises, Total Factor Energy Efficiency, Asian Countries, SBM-Undesirable DEA Model.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Zhang, C., He, W. D. and Hao, R., Analysis of environmental regulation and total factor energy efficiency. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110, 1958–1968.

  • Zhang, C., He, W. D. and Hao, R., Comprehensive estimation of the financial risk of iron and steel enterprise- based on carbon emission reduction. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 75, 143–149.

  • Zhang, X. G. and Zhang, S. Q., Technical efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry: evidence from the new census data. Int. Rev. Appl. Econ., 2001, 15, 199–211.

  • Zhao, G. J. and Hao, Q. M., Data envelopment analysis of steel maker’s economical scale in China. J. Iron Steel, 2003, 38, 72–74 (in Chinese).

  • Movshuk, O., Restructuring, productivity and technical efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry, 1988–2000. J. Asian Econ., 2004, 15, 135–161.

  • Han, J., Productivity and production efficiency of China’s ironsteel listed companies: a research based on DEA-Tobit. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. (Soc. Sci.), 2008, 1, 119–126 (in Chinese).

  • Wei, Y. M., Liao, H. and Fan, Y., An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel sector. Energy, 2007, 32, 2262–2270.

  • Zhang, Q. Z., He, F. and Zhao, X., Analysis of Chinese energy efficiency of iron and steel industry based on super-efficiency DEA. Soft Sci., 2012, 26, 65–68 (in Chinese).

  • Du, C. L. and Cheng, J. H., Evaluation on circular economy efficiency about iron and steel industry in China: 2003–2006. Ind. Econ. Res., 2009, 5, 7–14 (in Chinese).

  • Han, Y. J. and Liu, X. L., Analysis of energy efficiency and energy-saving and emission-reduction potential of steel industry in various regions of China based on super-efficiency DEA model. J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci., 2011, 31, 287–298 (in Chinese).

  • Zhang, Q. Z., He, F. and Lei, J. S., Study of Chinese iron and steel enterprises energy-saving and emission reduction and scale under the view of technical efficiency. Soft Sci., 2013, 27, 6–10 (in Chinese).

  • He, F., Zhu, L. Y., Ma, D. D. and Jiang, W., Research on the green technical efficiency of China’s iron and steel enterprise. China Ind. Econ., 2015, 7, 84–98 (in Chinese).

  • Cai, X. C. and Zou, K., The analysis of energy efficiency in the steel industry listed companies based on DEA-Malmquist. Stat. Inf. Forum., 2012, 27, 90–98 (in Chinese).

  • Lin, B. Q. and Wang, X. L., Exploring energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry: a stochastic frontier approach. Energy Policy, 2014, 72, 87–96.

  • Zhu, Z. J. and Wang, Q. L., Research on the path of improving China’s iron and steel industry energy utilization rate from the perspective of sustainable development. J. Changchun Univ., 2015, 25, 1–7 (in Chinese).

  • Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K. and Pasurka, C., Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1989, 71, 90–98.

  • Haynes, M. A., MacGillivray, H. L. and Mengersen, K. L., Robustness of ranking and selection rules using generalized g-and-k distributions. J. Stat. Plan. Inter., 1997, 65, 45–66.

  • Shephard, R. W., Theory of Cost and Production Functions, University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970.

  • Chung, Y. R., Făre, R. and Grosskopf, S., Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J. Environ. Manage., 1997, 51, 229–240.

  • Fare, R. and Grosskopf, S., Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2004, 157, 242–245.

  • Zaim, O., Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollutions intensities: a DEA frame work. Ecol. Econ., 2004, 15, 199–211.

  • Tone, K., A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2001, 130, 498–509.

  • Hu, J. L. and Wang, S. C., Total factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 2006, 34, 3206–3217.

  • Coelli, T., A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models. Oper. Res. Lett., 1998, 23, 3–5.


Abstract Views: 537

PDF Views: 113




  • Comparative Analysis of Asian Main Iron and Steel Countries' Total Factor Energy Efficiency

Abstract Views: 537  |  PDF Views: 113

Authors

Chuan Zhang
Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, No. 30, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
Weida He
Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, No. 30, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
Rong Hao
Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, No. 30, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China

Abstract


This article evaluates the total factor energy efficiency, energy conservation potential and emission reduction potential of the typical enterprises in the main iron and steel-producing countries such as China, India, Japan and Korea by applying the SBM-desirable DEA model and the SBM-undesirable DEA model. The findings are beneficial for understanding the development status of the main Asian iron and steel-producing countries. The empirical results indicate that the Chinese iron and steel enterprises in the sample made great progress in terms of the total factor energy efficiency. Korea's POSCO and Japan's JFE Group and Nippon Steel enterprise performed the best in terms of energy efficiency, energy conservation and emission reduction. The total factor energy efficiency value of India's Tata Steel is comparatively well. It has completed Jamshedpur Works' brownfield expansion project, which help it add eco-efficient products to its portfolio while using fewer natural resources, less energy and less water per tonne of steel produced.

Keywords


Iron and Steel Enterprises, Total Factor Energy Efficiency, Asian Countries, SBM-Undesirable DEA Model.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi11%2F2226-2233