Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Determinants of Occupancy and Burrow Site Selection by Indian Crested Porcupine in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India


Affiliations
1 Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (Post), Coimbatore 641 108, India
 

We examined factors responsible for spatial occupancy and burrow site selection for permanent occupancy by Indian crested porcupine in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India. We employed occupancy framework to examine a priori hypotheses and to obtain detection histories of faecal droppings and burrow occurrence. The detection probability (0.19 ± 0.05SE) and occupancy (0.28 ± 0.05SE) of burrow sites were lower than those of faecal deposits (0.33 ± 0.029SE and 0.71 ± 0.06SE) respectively. The rodents avoided areas with water cover and selected those closer to the boundary of nearby agricultural fields at higher elevation as burrow sites. None of the considered covariates influenced their spatial occupancy. This study infers the strategic placement of burrows by these apex ecosystem engineers, also providing crucial ecological niche for various other co-occupants.

Keywords

Burrows, Hystrix indica, Occupancy Modelling, Site Selection, Spatial Occupancy.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Pianka, E. R., Evolutionary Ecology, Addison-Wesley-Longman, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2000, 6th edn.

  • Wiens, J. J., Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution, 2004, 58, 193–197.

  • Mortberg, U. M., Resident bird species in urban forest remnants; landscape and habitat perspectives. Landsc. Ecol., 2001, 16, 193–203.

  • Gu, W. and Swihart, R. K., Absent or undetected? Effects of nondetection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biol. Conserv., 2004, 116, 195–203.

  • Haim, R. J., Aarde, V. and Skinner, J. D., Burrowing and huddling in newborn porcupine: the effect on thermoregulation. Physiol. Behav., 1992, 52, 247–250.

  • Wilson, D. S., Nest-site selection: microhabitat variation and its effects on the survival of turtle embryos. Ecology, 1998, 79, 1884–1892.

  • Madsen, T. and Shine, R., Life history consequences of nest-site variation in tropical pythons (Liasis fuscus). Ecology, 1999, 80, 989–997.

  • Ciarniello, L. M., Boyce, M. S., Heard, D. C. and Seip, D. R., Denning behavior and den site selection of grizzly bears along the Parsnip River, British Columbia, Canada. Ursus, 2005, 16, 47–58.

  • Campbell III, T. M. and Clark, T. W., Colony characteristics and vertebrate associates of white-tailed and black-tailed prairie Dogs in Wyoming. Am. Midl. Nat., 1981, 105, 269–276.

  • Reichman, O. J. and Smith, S. C., Burrows and burrowing behavior by mammals. Curr. Mammal., 1990, 2, 197–244.

  • Roper, T. J., Ostler, J. R., Schmid, T. K. and Christian, S. F., Site use in European badgers Meles Meles. Behaviour, 2001, 138, 173–187.

  • Cudworth, N. L. and Koprowski, J. L., Importance of scale in nest-site selection by Arizona gray squirrels. J. Wildl. Manage., 2011, 75, 1668–1674.

  • Endres, K. M. and Smith, W. P., Influence of age, sex, season and availability on den selection by raccoons within the Central Basin of Tennessee. Am. Midl, Nat., 1993, 129, 116–131.

  • Stromberg, M. R., Subsurface burrow connections and entrance spatial pattern of prairie dogs. Southwest. Nat., 1978, 23, 173–180.

  • Prater, S. H., The Book of Indian Animals, Diocesan Press, Madras, 1965.

  • Snyder, M. A. and Linhart, Y. B., Porcupine feeding patterns: selectivity by a generalist herbivore? Can. J. Zool., 1997, 75, 2107–2111.

  • Gurung, K. K. and Singh, R., Field Guide to the Mammals of the Indian Subcontinent, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1996.

  • Ellerman, J. R. and Morrison-Scott, T. C. S., Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals, 1758–1946. British Museum Natural History, London, 1951.

  • Saleh, M. A. and Basuony, M., A contribution to the mammalogy of the Sinai Peninsula. Mammalia, 1998, 62, 557–575.

  • Amori, G., Hutterer, R., Kryštufek, B., Yigit, N., Mitsain, G. and Palamo, L. J., Hystrix indica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015.2., 2008; http://www.iucnredlist.org. accessed 24 July 2015.

  • Fattorini, N. and Pokheral, C. P., Activity and habitat selection of the Indian crested porcupine. Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 2012, 24, 377–387.

  • Arshad, M. I., Khan, R. A. and Khaliq, A., Food habits of the Indian crested porcupine, Hystrix indica. Pak. J. Zool., 1990, 22, 413–415.

  • Sharma, D. and Prasad, S. N., Tree debarking and habitat use by porcupine (Hystrix indica Kerr) in Sariska National Park in Western India. Mammalia, 1992, 56, 351–361.

  • Roberts, T. J., The Mammals of Pakistan (revised edn), Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan, 1997.

  • Agrawal, V. C. and Chakraborty, S., The Indian crested porcupine, Hystrix indica (Kerr). In Rodents in Indian Agriculture (eds Prakash, I. and Ghosh, P. K.), Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, 1992, pp. 25–30.

  • Mendelssohn, H. and Yom-Tov, Y., Fauna Palaestina – Mammalia of Israel, Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem, Israel, 1999.

  • Monetti, L., Massolo, A., Sforzi, A. and Lovari, S., Site selection and fidelity by crested porcupines for denning. Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 2005, 17, 149–159.

  • Alkon, P. U. and Saltz, D., Influence of season and moonlight on temporal – activity patterns of Indian crested porcupine (Hystrix indica). J. Mammal., 1988, 69, 71–80.

  • Alkon, P. U. and Saltz, D., Patterns of crested porcupine (Hystrix indica) damage to cultivated potatoes. Agric. Ecosystem. Environ., 1985, 14, 171–183.

  • Khan, A. A., Ahmad, S., Hussain, I. and Munir, S., Deterioration impact of Indian crested porcupine, Hystrix indica, on forestry and agricultural systems in Pakistan. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2000, 45, 143–149.

  • Hafeez, S., Khan, G. S., Ashfaq, M. and Khan, Z. H., Food habits of the Indian crested porcupine (Hystrix indica) in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 2011, 48, 205–210.

  • Gutterman, Y. and Herr, N., Influences of porcupine (Hystrix indica) on the slopes of the northern Negev mountains – germination and vegetation renewal in different geomorphological types and slope directions. Oecologia, 1981, 51, 332–334.

  • Gutterman, Y., Observations on the feeding habits of the Indian crested porcupine (Hystrix indica) and the distribution of some hemicryptophytes and geophytes in the Negev desert highlands. J. Arid. Environ., 1982, 5, 61–268.

  • Dean, W. R. J. and Milton, S. J., Disturbances in semi-arid shrubland and arid grassland in the Karoo, South Africa: mammal diggings as germination sites. Afr. J. Ecol., 1991, 29, 11–16.

  • Taber, R. D., Sheri, A. N. and Ahmad, M. S., Mammals of the Lyallpur region, West Pakistan. J. Mammal., 1967, 48, 392–407.

  • Kadhim, A. H. H., Distribution and reproduction of the Indian crested porcupine Hystrix indica (Hystricidae: Rodentia) in Iraq. Zool. Middle East, 1997, 15, 9–12.

  • Mori, E., Maggini, I. and Menchetti, M., When quills kill. The defence strategy of the crested porcupine Hystrix cristata L., 1758. Mammalia, 2013, 78, 229–234.

  • Bhupathy, S. and Ramesh, C., Ecology of the endangered Indian rock Python, Python molurus in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India. Final Report Submitted to the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, 2010.

  • Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H. and Shachak, M., Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 1994, 69, 373–386.

  • Wilby, A., Shachak, M. and Boeken, B., Integration of ecosystem engineering and tropic effects of herbivores. Oikos, 2001, 92, 436–444.

  • Bhupathy, S. and Haque, M. H., Association of rock python (Python molurus) with porcupine (Hystrix indica). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1986, 83, 449–450.

  • Ali, S. and Vijayan, V. S., Keoladeo National Park Ecological Study Summary Report 1980–85, Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, 1986.

  • Mathur, V. B., Sivakumar, K., Singh, B. and Anoop, K. R., A bibliographical Review for Identifying Research Gap Areas: Keoladeo Ghana National Park – a World Heritage site. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2009.

  • O’Shea, M., Boas and Pythons of the World, New Holland Publishers, London, 2007.

  • Krishnan, S., Bhupathy, S. and Devi Prasad, K. V., Monitoring of Python molurus molurus in Keoladeo National Park. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Hamadryad, 2009, 34, 28–33.

  • Rodgers, W. A., Panwar, H. S. and Mathur, V. B., Wildlife Protected Areas in India: a review (executive summary). Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2002.

  • Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Government of India Press, Nasik, India, 1968.

  • Vijayan, V. S., Keoladeo National Park – ecology study: final report (1980–1990). US Fish and Wildlife Service: Ministry of Environment and Government of India. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, 1991.

  • Sever, Z. and Mendelssohn, H., Spatial movement patterns of porcupines (Hystrix indica). Mammalia, 1991, 55, 187–206.

  • Mori, E., Lovari, S., Sforzi, A., Romeo, G., Pisani, C., Massolo, A. and Fattorini, L., Patterns of spatial overlap in a monogamous large rodent, the crested porcupine. Behav. Process., 2014, 107, 112–118.

  • Woods, C. A., Erethizon dorsatum. Mamm. Species, 1973, 29, 1–6.

  • Putman, R. J., Facts from faeces. Mammal Rev., 1984, 14, 79–97.

  • Hines, J. E., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Mackenzie, D. I., Gopalaswamy, A. M., Sambakumar, N. and Karanth, K. U., Tigers on trails: occupancy modeling for cluster sampling. Ecol. Appl., 2010, 20, 1456–1466.

  • Jain, M., Utpal, S. and Mukhopadhyay, S., Indirect evidences of wildlife activities in sholas of Western Ghats, a biodiversity hotspot. Vestn. Zool., 2011, 45, 153–159.

  • D’Adamo, P., Guichon, M. L., Bó, R. F. and Cassini, M. H., Habitat use by coypu Myocaster coypus in agrosystems of the Argentinean Pampas. Acta Theriol., 2000, 45, 25–34.

  • Bhargava, R. N., Rajpurohit, L. S., Prashanth, B. and Madan, S., On the porcupine (Hystrix indica) in western Thar Desert. Tigerpaper, 2001, 28, 1–3.

  • Carter, D. C., Webster, W. D., Jones Jr, J. K., Jones, C. and Suttkus, R. D., Dipodomys elator. Mamm. Species, 1985, 232, 1–3.

  • Laundre, J. W. and Reynolds, T. D., Effects of soil structure on burrow characteristics of five small mammal species. Gt. Basin. Nat., 1993, 53, 358–366.

  • Sulentich, J. M., Williams, L. R. and Cameron, G. N., Geomys breviceps. Mamm. Species, 1991, 383, 1–4.

  • Reading, R. P. and Matchett, R., Attributes of black-tailed prairie dog colonies in north-central Montana. J. Wildl. Manage., 1997, 61, 664–673.

  • Krishna, Y. C., Krishnaswamy, J. and Kumar, N. S., Habitat factors affecting site occupancy and relative abundance of fourhorned antelope. J. Zool., 2008, 276, 63–70.

  • Saracco, J. F., Siegel, R. B. and Wilkerson, R. L., Occupancy modeling of black-backed woodpeckers on burned Sierra Nevada forests. Ecosphere, 2011, 2(3), 1–7.

  • Das, S., Dutta, S., Sen, S., Jijumon, A. S., Babu, S., Kumara, H. N. and Singh, M., Identifying regions for conservation of sloth bears through occupancy modelling in north-eastern Karnataka, India. Ursus, 2014, 25, 111–120.

  • MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A. and Langtimm, C. A., Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 2002, 83, 2248–2255.

  • Prasad, V. P., Mason, D., Marburger, J. E. and Kumar, C. R. A., Illustrated Flora of Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, Oxford University Press, Mumbai, 1996.

  • Curtis, J. T. and McIntosh, R. P., The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 1950, 31, 434–455.

  • Philips, E. A., Methods of Vegetation Study, Henry Holt and Co, New York, 1959.

  • Muller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H., Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology, John Wiley, New York, USA, 1974.

  • Thien, S. J., A flow diagram for teaching texture by feel analysis. J. Agron. Educ., 1979, 8, 54–55.

  • MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L. and Hines, J. E., Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence, Elsevier, New York, USA, 2006.

  • Hines, J. E., Program Presence (version 9): software to compute estimates patch occupancy rates and related parameters. USGSPWRC, 2015; http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html

  • Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R., Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, SpringerVerlag, New York, 1998.

  • Griesemer, S. J., Fuller, T. K. and Degraaf, R. M., Habitat use by porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum) in Central Massachusetts: effects of topography and forest composition. Am. Midl. Nat., 1998, 140, 271–279.

  • Morin, P., Berteaux, D. and Klvana, I., Hierarchical habitat selection by North American porcupines in southern boreal forest. Can. J. Zool., 2005, 83, 1333–1342.

  • Saltz, D. and Alkon, P. U., On the spatial behaviour of Indian crested porcupines Hystrix indica. J. Zool., 1989, 217, 55–266.

  • de Villiers, M. S., van Aarde, R. J. and Dott, H. M., Habitat utilization by the Cape porcupine Hystrix africaeaustralis in a savanna ecosystem. J. Zool., 1994, 232, 539–549.

  • Ramesh, T. and Downs, C. T., Impact of land use on occupancy and abundance of terrestrial mammals in the Drakensberg Midlands, South Africa. J. Nat. Conserv., 2015, 23, 9–18.

  • McLoughlin, P. D., Case, R. L., Gau, R. J., Cluff, H. D., Mulders, R. and Messier, F., Hierarchical habitat selection by barren ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic. Oecologia, 2002, 132, 102–108.

  • McLoughlin, P. D., Walton, L. R., Cluff, H. D., Paquet, P. C. and Ramsay, M. A., Hierarchical habitat selection by tundra wolves. J. Mammal., 2004, 85, 576–580.

  • Fortin, D., Fryxell, J. M., O’Brodovich, L. and Frandsen, D., Foraging ecology of bison at the landscape and plant community levels: the applicability of energy maximization principles. Oecologia, 2003, 134, 219–227.


Abstract Views: 400

PDF Views: 149




  • Determinants of Occupancy and Burrow Site Selection by Indian Crested Porcupine in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract Views: 400  |  PDF Views: 149

Authors

Aditi Mukherjee
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (Post), Coimbatore 641 108, India
Honnavalli Nagaraj Kumara
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (Post), Coimbatore 641 108, India
Subramanian Bhupathy
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (Post), Coimbatore 641 108, India

Abstract


We examined factors responsible for spatial occupancy and burrow site selection for permanent occupancy by Indian crested porcupine in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India. We employed occupancy framework to examine a priori hypotheses and to obtain detection histories of faecal droppings and burrow occurrence. The detection probability (0.19 ± 0.05SE) and occupancy (0.28 ± 0.05SE) of burrow sites were lower than those of faecal deposits (0.33 ± 0.029SE and 0.71 ± 0.06SE) respectively. The rodents avoided areas with water cover and selected those closer to the boundary of nearby agricultural fields at higher elevation as burrow sites. None of the considered covariates influenced their spatial occupancy. This study infers the strategic placement of burrows by these apex ecosystem engineers, also providing crucial ecological niche for various other co-occupants.

Keywords


Burrows, Hystrix indica, Occupancy Modelling, Site Selection, Spatial Occupancy.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi12%2F2440-2448