Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Updated Account of Mammal Species and Population Status of Ungulates in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan


Affiliations
1 Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore 641 108, India
2 Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, University School of Environment Management, Sector 16C, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 078, India
 

This study documents the present status of mammals in Keoladeo National Park (KNP) and assesses the population structure of ungulates. It provides a comprehensive account of the mammal diversity of the park and aims to compare the change in mammalian species account ever since the park became a protected area. We employed line transect surveys for density estimation of ungulates. We report local extinction of eight species since 1966, and extant diversity of 34 mammalian species in KNP. The estimated densities of chital, feral cattle, nilgai, wild boar and sambar were 52.37, 33.66, 13.68, 3.21 and 0.32 individuals/km2 respectively. Although blackbuck has become locally extinct and sambar density has significantly reduced, chital and nilgai as habitat generalists have increased in density in the last 25 years, which has contributed to an overall increase in ungulate population density in KNP. The mammalian diversity has changed substantially with local extinction of some carnivores and constant change in the habitat condition.

Keywords

Distance Sampling, Density, Local Extinction, Mammal Account, Population Dynamics, Ungulates.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • McComb, B., Zuckerberg, B., Vesely, D. and Jordan, C., Monitoring Animal Populations and their Habitats: A Practitioe’s Guide, CRC Press, 2010.

  • MacKenzie, D. I., Bailey, L. L., Hines, J. E. and Nichols, J. D., An integrated model of habitat and species occurrence dynamics. Meth. Ecol. Evol., 2011, 2, 612–627.

  • Findlay, C. S. and Houlahan, J., Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conserv. Biol., 1997, 11, 1000–1009.

  • Gurd, D. B., Nudds, T. D. and Rivard, D. H., Conservation of mammals in Eastern North American wildlife reserves: How small is too small? Conserv. Biol., 2001, 15, 1355–1363.

  • Hanski, I., Moilanen, A. and Gyllenberg, M., Minimum viable meta population size. Am. Nat., 1996, 147, 527–541.

  • Best, L. B., Bergin, T. M. and Freemark, K. E., Influence of landscape composition on bird use of rowcrop fields. J. Wildl. Manage., 2001, 65, 442–449.

  • Caughley, G., Analysis of Vertebrate Populations, John Wiley, Chichester, England, 1977.

  • Khan, J. A., Chellam, R. and Johnsingh, A. J., Group size and age-sex composition of three major ungulate species in Gir Lion Sanctuary, Gujarat, India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1995, 92, 295–302.

  • Jathanna, D., Karanth, K. U. and Johnsingh, A. J. T., Estimation of large herbivore densities in the tropical forests of southern India using distance sampling. J. Zool., 2003, 261, 285–290.

  • McNaughton, S. J., Grassland–herbivore dynamics. In Serengiti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem (eds Sinclair, A. R. S. and NortonGriffiths, M.), Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1979, pp. 46–81.

  • Crawley, M. J., Herbivory: the Dynamics of Animal–Plant Interactions, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1983.

  • Eisenberg, J. F. and Seidesticker, J., Ungulates in southern Asia: a consideration of biomass estimates for selected habitats. Biol. Conserv., 1976, 10, 293–308.

  • Malagnoux, M., Sène, E. H. and Atzmon, N., Forests, trees and water in arid lands: a delicate balance. Unasylva, 2007, 58, 24–29.

  • Gibbs, J. P., Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol., 2000, 14, 314–317.

  • Ali, S., and Vijayan, V. S., Keoladeo National Park Ecological Study Summary Report 1980–85, Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay, 1986.

  • Misra, M. K., Improving protection and building capacity of staff at Keoladeo National Park. Technical report No. 5. UNESCOIUCNWII, Paris, 2005.

  • Mathur, V. B., Sivakumar, K., Singh, B. and Anoop, K. R., A Bibliographical Review for Identifying Research Gap Areas: Keoladeo Ghana National Park – A World Heritage Site, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2009.

  • Vijayan, V. S., Keoladeo National Park – Ecology Study: Final Report (1980–1990). US Fish and Wildlife Service: Ministry of Environment and Government of India. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, 1991.

  • Shukla, J. B. and Dubey, B.. Effect of changing habitat on species: application to Keoladeo National Park, India. Ecol. Modelling, 1996, 86, 91–99.

  • Middleton, B. A., The water buffalo controversy in Keoladeo national park, India. Ecol. Modelling, 1998, 106, 93.

  • Karanth, K. U. and Nichols, J. D., Monitoring Tigers and their Prey, Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, 2002.

  • Ramesh, C. and Bhupathy, S., Breeding biology of Python molurusmolurus in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, India. Herpetol. J., 2010, 20, 157–163.

  • Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Government of India Press, Nasik, 1968.

  • Bureau de la Convention de Ramsar (Gland), Inde. Ministry of Environment, Forests and Hails, A. J., Wetlands, biodiversity and the Ramsar convention: the role of the convention on wetlands in the conservation and wise use of biodiversity. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, 1997.

  • Anoop, K. R., Progress of Prosopis juliflora eradication work in Keoladeo National Park. Report, Rajasthan Forest Department, Rajasthan, 2010.

  • Bhadouria, B. S. and Mathur, V. B., Rural community participation and its socioeconomic development through forest management – a case study, Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, India. Spanish J. Rural Develop., 2014, 4, 49–56.

  • IUCN, World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation. Keoladeo National Park, Infobase produced by WCMC, January 1992, p. 17.

  • Schaller, G. B., Spillett, J. J., Cohen, J. E. and De, R. C., The status of the large mammals in the Keoladeo Ghana Sanctuary, Rajasthan. IUCN Bulletin New Series No. 20, 1966.

  • Bates, P. J. J. and Harrison, D. L., Bats of the Indian Subcontinent, Harrison Zoological Museum Press, England, 1997.

  • Sharma, S., Sharma, S. K. and Sharma, S., Notes on mammalian fauna of Rajasthan. Zoos’s Print J., 2003, 8, 1085–1088.

  • Bhupathy, S., Occurrence of the bicolored leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros fulvus) in Rajasthan. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1987, 84, 199–200.

  • Eberhardt, L. L., Transects method for population studies. J. Wildl. Manage., 1978, 42, 1–31.

  • Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L. and Thomas, L., Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.

  • Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C. and Hastie, T., Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol. Modelling, 2002, 157, 89–100.

  • R version 3.2.3. ‘Wooden Christmas-Tree’. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015. Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64.

  • Thomas, L. et al., Distance 6.0. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St Andrews, UK, 2009; http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/

  • Focardi S., Isotti, R. and Tinelli, A., Line transect estimates of ungulate populations in a mediterranean forest. J. Wildl. Manage., 2002, 66, 48–58.

  • Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. and Laake, J. L., Estimation of density from line transects sampling of biological populations. Wildl. Monogr., 1980, 72, 44.

  • Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P. and Laake, J. L., Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations, Chapman and Hall, London, 1993.

  • Karanth, K. U. and Sunquist, M. E., Population structure, density and biomass of large herbivores in the tropical forests of Nagarahole, India. J. Trop. Ecol., 1992, 8, 21–35.

  • HT Correspondent, Keoladeo National Park on alert after leopard sighted. Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur). Retrieved from www.pressreader.com/india/hindustan-times-st-jaipur/20161106/281582355194776, 6 June 2016.

  • Sebastian, S., Elusive Bharatpur tiger netted. The Hindu, Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/ elusive-bharatpur-tiger-netted/article1487593.ece?ref=relatedNews, 25 February 2011.

  • Mukherjee, S., Duckworth, J. W., Silva, A., Appel, A. and Kittle, A., Prionailurus rubiginosus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016; e.T18149A50662471; http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T18149A50662471.en (downloaded on 11 January 2017).

  • Azeez, P. A., Ramachandran, N. K. and Vijayan, V. S., The socioeconomics of the villages around Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur (Rajasthan), India. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 1992, 18, 169–179.

  • Sartaj, S. G., Sankar, K. and Jhala, Y. V., A Study of Vigilance Behaviour of Chital (Axis axis), Examining the Determinant of Individual and Group Vigilance for Chital in Pench Tiger Reserve, India, LAMBERT Academic Publishing, UK, 2010.

  • Johnsingh, A. J. T., Large mammalian prey-predators of Bandipur. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1983, 80, 1–57.

  • Ramesh, T., Sankar, K., Qureshi, Q. and Kalle, R., Group size, sex and age composition of chital (Axis axis) and sambar (Rusa unicolor) in a deciduous habitat of Western Ghats. Mamm. Biol., 2012, 77, 53–59.

  • Berger, J. and Gompper, M. E., Sex ratios in extant ungulates: products of contemporary predation or past life histories? J. Mamm., 1999, 80, 1084–1113.

  • Singh, A., Mukherjee, A., Dookia, S. and Kumara, H. N., High resource availability and lack of competition have increased population of a meso-carnivore – a case study of Golden Jackal in Keoladeo National Park, India. Mamm. Res., 2016, 61, 209–219.

  • Bagchi, S., Goyal, S. P., Sankar, K. and Sankar, K., Herbivore density and biomass in a semi-arid tropical dry deciduous forest of Western India. J. Trop. Ecol., 2004, 20, 475–478.

  • Kumar, N. S., Ungulate density and biomass in the tropical semiarid forest of Ranthambore, India. M.Sc. thesis. Salim Ali School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Pondicherry University, Pondicherry, India, 2000.

  • Khan, J. A., Chellam, R., Rodgers, W. R. and Johnsingh, A. J. T., Ungulate density and biomass in the tropical dry deciduous forests of Gir, Gujarat, India. J. Trop. Ecol., 1996, 12, 149–162.

  • Avinandan, D., Sankar, K. and Qureshi, Q., Prey selection by tigers (Pantheratigristigris) in Sariska tiger reserve, Rajasthan, India. J. Bom. Nat. Hist. Soc., 2008, 105, 247–254.

  • Haque, N. and Vijayan, V. S., Food habits of the smooth Indian otter (Lutra perspicillata) in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan (India). Mammalia, 1992, 59, 345–348.

  • Chourasia, P., Ecology of Golden Jackal Canis aureus in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, Ph D thesis, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, 2015.

  • Karanth, K. U. and Nichols, J. D., Ecological status and conservation of tigers in India. In Final Technical Report to the Division of International Conservation Society, Centre for Wildlife Studies, New York and Bangalore, 2000.

  • Kumara, H. N., Rathnakumar, S., Sasi, R. and Singh, M., Conservation status of wild mammals in Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Wildlife Sanctuary, the Western Ghats, India. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103, 933–940.

  • Biswas, S. and Sankar, K., Prey abundance and food habit of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India. J. Zool., 2002, 256, 411–420.

  • Schaller, G. B., The Deer and the Tiger, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 1967.

  • Varman, K. S. and Sukumar, R., The line transects method for estimating densities of large mammals in a tropical deciduous forest: an evaluation of methods and field experiments. J. Biosci., 1995, 20, 273–287.

  • Kumaraguru, A., Saravanamuthu, R., Brinda, K. and Asokan, S., Prey preference of large carnivores in Anamalai tiger reserve, India. Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 2011, 57, 627–637.

  • Haque, N., Study on the ecology of wild ungulates of Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Wildlife Sciences, AMU, 1990.


Abstract Views: 429

PDF Views: 115




  • An Updated Account of Mammal Species and Population Status of Ungulates in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan

Abstract Views: 429  |  PDF Views: 115

Authors

Aakriti Singh
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore 641 108, India
Aditi Mukherjee
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore 641 108, India
Sumit Dookia
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, University School of Environment Management, Sector 16C, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 078, India
Honnavalli Nagaraj Kumara
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore 641 108, India

Abstract


This study documents the present status of mammals in Keoladeo National Park (KNP) and assesses the population structure of ungulates. It provides a comprehensive account of the mammal diversity of the park and aims to compare the change in mammalian species account ever since the park became a protected area. We employed line transect surveys for density estimation of ungulates. We report local extinction of eight species since 1966, and extant diversity of 34 mammalian species in KNP. The estimated densities of chital, feral cattle, nilgai, wild boar and sambar were 52.37, 33.66, 13.68, 3.21 and 0.32 individuals/km2 respectively. Although blackbuck has become locally extinct and sambar density has significantly reduced, chital and nilgai as habitat generalists have increased in density in the last 25 years, which has contributed to an overall increase in ungulate population density in KNP. The mammalian diversity has changed substantially with local extinction of some carnivores and constant change in the habitat condition.

Keywords


Distance Sampling, Density, Local Extinction, Mammal Account, Population Dynamics, Ungulates.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi01%2F103-111