Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Environment:A Futuristic View


Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
 

The earth today is experiencing environmental conditions unprecedented in the history of the planet. Biodiversity is the basis of ecosystem services for human well-being. Reports indicate that the earth has indeed entered into a phase of mass extinction, and that the ecological footprint has substantially exceeded the biocapacity of the earth. It is argued that the ecological footprint must be reduced through sustainable development which should keep nature at its core. Anthropogenic activities have led to global environmental change which is adversely affecting human well-being. Global warming may result in a temperature rise of 4-5°C; the world food production may substantially decline, and the sea level may rise by up to 195 cm by 2100, inundating vast coastal areas. Almost four billion people are facing water scarcity. Three of the nine Rockstrom's planetary boundaries have already been exceeded. However, the encouraging fact is that the nations have agreed to limit global warming to 1.5°C, which gives us hope.

Keywords

Biocapacity, Ecological Footprint, Global Warming, Planet Boundary, Societal Support, Sustainable Development.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Cook, J. et al., Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett., 2013, 8(2), 024024.

  • Ponting, C., A New Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations, Vintage, London, UK, 2007.

  • Diamond, J., Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive, Penguin, London, UK, 2011.

  • Carson, R., Silent Spring, Honghton Mifflin Co, Boston, MA, USA, 1962.

  • Ward, B. and Dubos, R., Only one earth: the care and maintenance of a small planet. Atoll. Res. Bull., 1972, 166, 1–10.

  • Ward, B., Spaceship Earth, Columbia University Press, NY, USA, 1966.

  • Revelle, R. and Suess, H. E., Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO2 during the past decades. Tellus, 1957, 9, 18–27.

  • Broecker, W. S., Climate change: are we on the brink of a pronounced global warming? Science, 1975, 189, 460–463.

  • Morgan, R. A., Histories for an uncertain future: environmental history and climate change. Aust. Hist. Stud., 2013, 44(3), 350–360.

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al., Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science, 2007, 318, 1737–1742.

  • Lindenmayer, D. B. et al., Contemplating the future: acting now on long-term monitoring to answer 2050’s questions. Aust. Ecol., 2015, 40(30), 213–224.

  • Rockstrom, J. et al., A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 2009, 461, 472–475.

  • Hooper, D. U. et al., A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature, 2012; 486, 105–108.

  • Holloway, J., Hot, crowded, and running out of fuel: earth of 2050 a scary place, 2012; http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/03/hotcrowded-and-running-out-of-fuel-earth-of-2050-a-scaryplace/ (cited 1 November 2013).

  • Fulton, B., Where is Australia headed? Some future projections. The conversation, 2013; http://theconversation.com/where-is-australia-headed-some-future-projections-12403 (cited 5 November 2013).

  • Alley, R. B., A heated mirror for future climate. Science, 2016; 352(6282), 151–152.

  • van Gils, J. A. et al., Body shrinkage due to Arctic warming reduces red knot fitness in tropical wintering range. Science, 2016, 352(6287), 819–821.

  • Mekonnen, M. M. and Hoekstra, A. Y., Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv., 2016, 2, e1500323.

  • Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J. and Nicholls, R. J., Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding – a global assessment. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(3), e0118571.

  • Subramanian, M., India’s capital scrambles to tackle its epic pollution problems. Nature, 2016, 534, 166–169.

  • WCED, Our Common Future, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1987.

  • United Nations, General Assembly, 68th Session, Item 19 of the provisional agenda, 2013.

  • United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme, Delivering on the environmental dimensions of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: a concept note, 2015.

  • Milfont, T. L. and Schultz, P. W., Culture and the natural environment. Curr. Opn. Psychol., 2016, 8, 194–199.

  • Bratspies, R., Do we need a human right to a healthy environment? Santa Clara J. Int. L., 2015, 13, 31–69; http://digital-commons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol13/iss1/3

  • Tollefson, J., The 2°C dream. Nature, 2015, 527, 436–438.

  • Kintisch, E., New solution to carbon pollution? Science, 2016, 352(6291), 1262–1263.

  • Lewis, S. L., The Paris agreement has solved a troubling problem. Nature, 2016, 532, 283.

  • Schaaf, L., Leading the way. In Our Planet: Inclusive Green Economy. Building Bridges to a Sustainable Future, United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya, 2016.


Abstract Views: 324

PDF Views: 95




  • Environment:A Futuristic View

Abstract Views: 324  |  PDF Views: 95

Authors

J. S. Singh
Department of Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India

Abstract


The earth today is experiencing environmental conditions unprecedented in the history of the planet. Biodiversity is the basis of ecosystem services for human well-being. Reports indicate that the earth has indeed entered into a phase of mass extinction, and that the ecological footprint has substantially exceeded the biocapacity of the earth. It is argued that the ecological footprint must be reduced through sustainable development which should keep nature at its core. Anthropogenic activities have led to global environmental change which is adversely affecting human well-being. Global warming may result in a temperature rise of 4-5°C; the world food production may substantially decline, and the sea level may rise by up to 195 cm by 2100, inundating vast coastal areas. Almost four billion people are facing water scarcity. Three of the nine Rockstrom's planetary boundaries have already been exceeded. However, the encouraging fact is that the nations have agreed to limit global warming to 1.5°C, which gives us hope.

Keywords


Biocapacity, Ecological Footprint, Global Warming, Planet Boundary, Societal Support, Sustainable Development.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi02%2F210-217