Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Modelling the Effect of Photoinhibition on Microalgal Production Potential in Fixed and Trackable Photobioreactors in Odisha, India


Affiliations
1 Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769 008, India
2 Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769 008, India
 

Microalgae have received a great deal of attention among researchers in recent decades in the production of sustainable bioenergy due to the limitations of second-generation biofuels. However, scalability and economics are the two key challenges that need to be overcome for sustainable biofuel production at field level, and mathematical modelling can be utilized as an effective tool to evaluate the influencing factors. This article focuses on the mathematical modelling of microalgal growth and carbon dioxide sequestration potential of a fixed photobioreactor (PBR) at 25° inclination facing south and a two-axis trackable PBR in Odisha, India. The total geographic area of Odisha has been represented in 1195 spatial sites, each site representing around 130 sq. km of the real scale dimensions approximately. The model incorporates site-specific data of solar radiation, climatic conditions and PBR configurations to derive the bioenergy content of microalgal biomass by photon energy balance. The effect of photoinhibition was also studied, and the outputs from the mathematical modelling, such as daily microalgal lipid production and carbon dioxide sequestration potential were plotted for the whole of Odisha using QGIS software. The net microalgal biomass production rate drastically reduced to around 30% and 40% due to the effect of photoinhibition in the case of fixed and trackable PBR systems respectively. The outcome of the present study could influence the policy-makers for selecting suitable sites for the implementation of microalgal-based biofuel production facility.

Keywords

Biofuel, Mathematical Modelling, Microalgal Photobioreactors, Photoinhibition Effect, Production.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Zhou, Y., Schideman, L. and Yu, G. and Zhang, Y., A synergistic combination of algal wastewater treatment and hydrothermal biofuel production maximized by nutrient and carbon recycling. Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3765–3779.

  • Bauer, N., Bosetti, V., Hamdi-Cherif, M., Kitous, A., McCollum, D., Mejean, A. and Rao, S., CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2015, 90, 243–256.

  • Christenson, L. and Sims, R., Production and harvesting of microalgae for wastewater treatment, biofuels and bioproducts. Biotechnol. Adv., 2011, 29, 686–702.

  • Shen, Y., Carbondioxide bio-fixation and wastewater treatment via algae photochemical synthesis for biofuels production. RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 49672–49722.

  • Meenakshi, B. and Siemann, E., Low algal diversity systems are a promising method for biodiesel production in wastewater fed open reactors. Algae, 2015, 30(1), 67–79.

  • Park, J. B. and Craggs, R. J., Algal production in wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds for potential biofuel use. Water Sci. Technol., 2011, 63(10), 2403–2410.

  • Weyer, K. M., Bush, D. R., Darzins, A. and Wilson, B. D., Theoretical maximum algal oil production. Bioenergy Res., 2010, 3, 204–213.

  • Sudhakar, K. and Premalatha, M., Theoretical assessment of algal biomass potential for carbon mitigation and biofuel production. IJEE, 2012, 3(3), 232–240.

  • Zemke, P., Wood, B. and Dye, D., Considerations for the maximum production rates of triacylglycerol from microalgae. Biomass Bioenergy, 2010, 34, 145–151.

  • Abraham, M. A., Demessie, B. A. and Murthy, G. S., Theoretical estimation the potential of algal biomass for biofuel production and carbon sequestration in Ethiopia. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res., 2013, 3(3), 560–570.

  • Malek, A., Zullo, L. C. and Daoutidis, P., Modeling and dynamic optimization of microalgae cultivation in outdoor open ponds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2015, 55(12), 3327–3337.

  • Moody, J. W., McGinty, C. M. and Quinn, J. C., Global evaluation of biofuel potential from microalgae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, 111(23), 8691–8696.

  • Slegers, P., Wijffels, R., Straten, G. V. and Boxtel, A. V., Design scenarios for flat panel photobioreactors. Appl. Energy, 2011, 88, 3342–3353.

  • Slegers, P., Lösing, M., Wijffels, R., Straten, G. V. and Boxtel, A. V., Scenario evaluation of open pond microalgae production. Algal Res., 2013, 2, 358–368.

  • National Disaster Risk Reduction Portal, Odisha, Government of India; http://nidm.gov.in/default.asp (accessed on 2 December 2015).

  • Solar-GIS; http://solargis.info/imaps/#loc=43.707594,11.601563 (accessed on 15 July 2015).

  • European Commision, Join Research Center Institute for Energy and Transport, 2012; http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/ (accessed on 15 July 2015).

  • Maxwell, E. L., Folger, A. G. and Hogg, S. E., Resource evaluation and site selection for microalgae production systems. Solar Energy Research Institute, Washington, DC, Rep.SERI/TR‐ 215‐2484, 1985.

  • Zhou, W. et al., Growing wastewater-born microalga Auxenochlorella protothecoides UMN280 on concentrated municipal wastewater for simultaneous nutrient removal and energy feedstock production. Appl. Energy, 2012, 98, 433–440.

  • Cai, T., Park, S. Y. and Li, Y., Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: status and prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2013, 19, 360–369.

  • Wu, L. F., Chen, P. C., Huang, A. P. and Lee, C. M., The feasibility of biodiesel production by microalgae using industrial wastewater. Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 113, 14–18.

  • Zhu, L., Wang, Z., Shu, Q., Takala, J., Hiltunen, E., Feng, P. and Yuan, Z., Nutrient removal and biodiesel production by integration of freshwater algae cultivation with piggery wastewater treatment. Water Res., 2013, 47(13), 4294–4302.

  • Hernandez, D., Riano, B., Coca, M. and Garcia-Gonzalez, M., Treatment of agro-industrial wastewater using microalgae–bacteria consortium combined with anaerobic digestion of the produced biomass. Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 135, 598–603.

  • Kumar, L., Skidmore, A. K. and Knowles, A., Modelling topographic variation in solar radiation in a GIS environment. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 1997, 11(5), 475–497.

  • Pruvosta, J., Cornet, J., LeBorgned, F., Goetz, V. and Legran, J., Theoretical investigation of microalgae culture in the light changing conditions of solar photobioreactor production and comparison with cyanobacteria. Algal Res., 2015, 10, 87–99.

  • Hindersin, S. and Leupold, M., Irradiance optimization of outdoor microalgal cultures using solar tracked photobioreactors. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng., 2013, 36, 345–355.

  • Han, B. P., Virtanen, M., Koponen, J. and Straskraba, M., Effect of photoinhibition on algal photosynthesis: a dynamic model. J. Plankton Res., 2000, 22(5), 865–885.

  • Rubio, F. C., Camacho, F. G. and Sevilla, J. M. F., A mechanistic model of photosynthesis in microalgae. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2002, 81(4), 459–473.

  • Goldman, Outdoor algal mass culture-II. Photosynthetic yield limitation. Water Res., 1979, 13, 119–136.

  • Ventura, J. R. S., Yang, B., Lee, Y. W., Lee, K. and Jahng, D., Life cycle analyses of CO2, energy, and cost for four different routes of microalgal bioenergy conversion. Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 137, 302–310.

  • Darzins, A., Pienkos, P. and Edye, L., Current status and potential for algal biofuels production. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, 2010.

  • Gueymard, C., Parameterized transmittance model for the direct beam and circumsolar spectral irradiance. Solar Energy, 2011, 75(5), 325–346.

  • Jacovides, C., Timvios, F., Papaioannou, G., Asimakopoulos, D. and Theofilou, C., Ratio of PAR to broadband solar radiation measured in Cyprus. Agric. For. Meteorol., 2004, 121(3–4), 135–1410.

  • Brennan, L. and Owende, P., Biofuels from microalgae – a review of technologies for production, processing and extraction of biofuels and co-products. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2010, 14(2), 557–577.

  • Das, K., A generic methodology for geographical assessment of microalgae potential, Master’s thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand, 2013.

  • Sudhakar, K., Premalatha, M. and Rajesh, M., Large-scale open pond algae biomass yield analysis in India: a case study. Int. J. Sustain. Energy, 2014, 33(2), 304–315.

  • Wigmosta, M. S., Coleman, A. M., Skaggs, R. J., Huesemann, M. H. and Lane, L. J., National microalgae biofuel production potential and resource demand. Water Resour. Res., 2011, 47, 1–13.

  • Aly, N. and Balasubramanian, P., Effect of photoinhibition on microalgal growth in open ponds of NIT Rourkela, India. J. Biochem. Technol., 2016, 6(3), 1034–1039.

  • Aly, N. and Balasubramanian, P., Effect of geographical coordinates on carbon dioxide sequestration potential by microalgae, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev., 2017, 8(2), 147–152.


Abstract Views: 464

PDF Views: 140




  • Modelling the Effect of Photoinhibition on Microalgal Production Potential in Fixed and Trackable Photobioreactors in Odisha, India

Abstract Views: 464  |  PDF Views: 140

Authors

Nazimdhine Aly
Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769 008, India
Rakesh Kumar Tarai
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769 008, India
Paresh Govind Kale
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769 008, India
Balasubramanian Paramasivan
Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769 008, India

Abstract


Microalgae have received a great deal of attention among researchers in recent decades in the production of sustainable bioenergy due to the limitations of second-generation biofuels. However, scalability and economics are the two key challenges that need to be overcome for sustainable biofuel production at field level, and mathematical modelling can be utilized as an effective tool to evaluate the influencing factors. This article focuses on the mathematical modelling of microalgal growth and carbon dioxide sequestration potential of a fixed photobioreactor (PBR) at 25° inclination facing south and a two-axis trackable PBR in Odisha, India. The total geographic area of Odisha has been represented in 1195 spatial sites, each site representing around 130 sq. km of the real scale dimensions approximately. The model incorporates site-specific data of solar radiation, climatic conditions and PBR configurations to derive the bioenergy content of microalgal biomass by photon energy balance. The effect of photoinhibition was also studied, and the outputs from the mathematical modelling, such as daily microalgal lipid production and carbon dioxide sequestration potential were plotted for the whole of Odisha using QGIS software. The net microalgal biomass production rate drastically reduced to around 30% and 40% due to the effect of photoinhibition in the case of fixed and trackable PBR systems respectively. The outcome of the present study could influence the policy-makers for selecting suitable sites for the implementation of microalgal-based biofuel production facility.

Keywords


Biofuel, Mathematical Modelling, Microalgal Photobioreactors, Photoinhibition Effect, Production.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi02%2F272-283