Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative End-To-End Evaluation of Research Organizations


Affiliations
1 Vidya Academy of Science and Technology, Thrissur 680 501, India
 

Comparative end-to-end research evaluations of large research entities like countries, agencies or institutions need to separate out the bibliometric part of the chain from the econometric part. Both size-dependent and size-independent terms play a crucial role to combine quantity and quality (impact) in a meaningful way. Output or outcome at the bibliometric level can be measured using zeroth, first or second-order composite indicators, and the productivity or efficiency terms follow accordingly using the input to output or outcome factors.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Composite Indicators, Comparative Research Evaluation, Size-Dependent Indicators, Size-Independent Indicators.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Savithri, S. and Prathap, G., Indian and Chinese higher education institutions compared using an end-to-end evaluation. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(10), 1922–1926.

  • Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C. A., How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2), 1129–1144.

  • Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C. A., A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators. J. Informetr., 2016, 10(2), 646–651.

  • Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C. A., A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators: rejoinder. J. Informetr., 2016, 10(2), 679–683.

  • Ruiz-Castillo, J. and Waltman, L., Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science. J. Informetr., 2015, 9(1), 102–117.

  • Leydesdorff, L. and Bornmann, L., Integrated impact indicators (I3) compared with impact factors (IFs): an alternative research design with policy implications. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011, 62(11), 2133–2146.

  • Prathap, G., The energy-exergy-entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(3), 515–524.

  • Hendrix, D., An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997–2007. J. Med. Libr. Assoc., 2008, 96(4), 324–334.


Abstract Views: 315

PDF Views: 99




  • Comparative End-To-End Evaluation of Research Organizations

Abstract Views: 315  |  PDF Views: 99

Authors

Gangan Prathap
Vidya Academy of Science and Technology, Thrissur 680 501, India

Abstract


Comparative end-to-end research evaluations of large research entities like countries, agencies or institutions need to separate out the bibliometric part of the chain from the econometric part. Both size-dependent and size-independent terms play a crucial role to combine quantity and quality (impact) in a meaningful way. Output or outcome at the bibliometric level can be measured using zeroth, first or second-order composite indicators, and the productivity or efficiency terms follow accordingly using the input to output or outcome factors.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Composite Indicators, Comparative Research Evaluation, Size-Dependent Indicators, Size-Independent Indicators.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi03%2F455-457