Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Estimation of Geomorphic Threshold in Permanent Gullies of Lateritic Terrain in Birbhum, West Bengal, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Geography, Chandrapur College, Chandrapur 713 145, India
2 Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, Barddhaman 713 104, India
 

The present geomorphic study focusses on predicting threshold conditions and vulnerable locations where gully heads might develop in the lateritic terrain, located at the eastern plateau fringe of Rajmahal Basalt Traps, Birbhum, West Bengal, India. The modern concept of geomorphic threshold is applied here on gully erosion hazard to identify the critical slope of gully head (S) and upstream drainage area (A) with a core relationship of S = aA-b. Based on 118 gully heads we have statistically derived significant relationships between slope and drainage area (r = -0.55); overland flow (Q) and slope length (L; r = 0.694); relative shear stress (τ) and slope (r = 0.915); as well as overland flow detachment rate (H) and eroding force of overland flow (F; r = 0.980). The established S-A critical relationship, as geomorphic threshold, is expressed as S = 17.419A-0.2517, above which gully initiation occurred on the laterites. This equation can be used as a predictive model to locate the vulnerable un-trenched slopes (i.e. potential gully erosion locations) in other lateritic areas of West Bengal. The constant b value (0.2517) and Montgomery-Dietrich envelope suggest a relative dominance of overland flow (52.51% of sample gully heads) in the erosion processes. The result of erosion model predicts an annual soil loss of 2.33-19.9 kg m-2 year-1 due to overland flow above the gully heads.

Keywords

Geomorphic Threshold, Gully, Laterite, Overland Flow.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Sinha, D. and Joshi, V. U., Application of universal soil loss equation (USLE) to recently reclaimed badlands along the Adula and Mahalungi Rivers, Pravara Basin, Maharastra. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2012, 80(3), 341–350.

  • Yadav, R. C. and Bhushan, L. S., Conservation of gullies in susceptible riparian areas of alluvial soil regions. Land Degrad. Develop., 2002, 13(3), 201–219.

  • Pathak, P., Wani, S. P. and Sudi, R., Gully erosion in SAT watersheds. SAT eJournal, 2006, 2(1), 1–22.

  • Singh, A. K., Kala, S., Dubey, S. K., Pande, V. C., Rao, B. K., Sharma, K. K. and Mahapatra, K. P., Technology for rehabilitation of Yamuna ravines – cost-effective practices to conserve natural resources through bamboo plantation. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(8), 1527–1533.

  • Narayana, D. V. V. and Babu, R., Estimation of soil erosion in India. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 1983, 109(4), 419–434.

  • Bhattacharyya, T., Babu, R., Sarkar, D., Mandal, C., Dhyani, B. L. and Nagar, A. P., Soil and crop productivity model in humid subtropical India. Curr. Sci., 2007, 93(10), 1397–1403.

  • Sharda, V. N., Dogra, P. and Prakash, C., Assessment of production losses due to water erosion in rainfed areas of India. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2010, 65(2), 79–91.

  • Sharda, V. N. and Dogra, P., Assessment of productivity and monetary losses due to water erosion in rainfed crops across different states of India for prioritization and conservation planning. Agric. Res., 2013, 2(4), 382–392.

  • Poesen, J., Nachtergaele, J., Verstraeten, G. and Valentin, C., Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs. Catena, 2003, 50(2–4), 91–133.

  • Valentin, C., Poesen, J. and Li, Y., Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control. Catena, 2005, 63(2–3), 132–153.

  • Poesen, J., Challenges in gully erosion research. Landf. Anal., 2011, 17, 5–9.

  • Vandekerckhove, L., Posen, J., Oostwoud Wijdenes, D., Nachtergaele, J., Kosmas, C., Roxo, M. J. and De Figueiredo De, T., Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe. Earth Surf. Process Landf., 2000, 25, 1201–1220.

  • Erskine, E. D., Gully erosion. In Water Encyclopedia: Surface and Agricultural Water (eds Lehr, J. et al.), Wiley, New York, 2005, pp. 183–188.

  • Knighton, D., Fluvial Forms and Processes, Arnold, New York, 1998, pp. 30–31.

  • Brice, J. C., Erosion and deposition in the loess-mantled Great Plains, Medicine Creek drainage basin, USGS Professional Paper, 325-H, Washington DC, 1966, pp. 255–337.

  • Schumm, S. A., Harvey, M. D. and Watson, C. C., Incised Channels – Morphology, Dynamics and Control, Water Resources Publication, Littleton, 1984.

  • Bull, L. J. and Kirkby, M. J., Gully erosion and modelling. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 21, 1997, 354–374.

  • Horton, R. E., Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1945, 56(3), 275–370.

  • Patton, P. C. and Schumm, S. A., Gully erosion, northwestern Colorado: a threshold phenomenon. Geology, 3, 1975, 88–90.

  • Montgomery, D. R. and Dietrich, W. E., Landscape dissection and drainage area – slope thresholds. In Process Models and Theoretical Geomorphology (ed. Kirkby, M. J.), John Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 221–246.

  • Schumm, S. A., Geomorphic thresholds: the concept and its applications. Trans. Inst. Brit. Geog., 1979, 4(4), 485–515.

  • Schumm, S. A., Geomorphic thresholds and complex response of drainage systems. In Fluvial Geomorphology (ed. Morisawa, M.), Binghamto, New York, 1973, pp. 299–310.

  • Schumm, S. A., Geomorphic threshold. In Encyclopedia of Geomorphology (ed. Goudie, A.), Routledge, London, 2004, pp. 1051–1052.

  • Jain, V., Tandon, S. K. and Sinha, R., Application of modern geomorphic concepts for understanding the spatio-temporal complexity of the large Ganga River dispersal system. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103(11), 1300–1319.

  • Vandaele, K., Poesen, J., Govers, G. and Wesemael, B., Geomorphic threshold conditions for ephemeral gully incision. Geomorphology, 1996, 16(2), 161–173.

  • Vandekerckhove, L., Poesen, J., Wijdenes, D. O. and Figueiredo, T., Topographic thresholds for ephemeral gully initiation in intensively cultivated areas of the Mediterranean. Catena, 1998, 33(3–4), 271–292.

  • Moeyersons, J., The topographic thresholds of hillslope incisions in southwestern Rwanda. Catena, 2003, 50(2–4), 381–400.

  • Morgan, R. P. C. and Mngomezulu, D., Threshold conditions for initiation of valley-side gullies in the Middle Veld of Swaziland. Catena, 2003, 50(2–4), 401–414.

  • Torri, D. and Borselli, L., A review of topographic threshold conditions for gully head development in different environment. Earth Sci. Rev., 2014, 130, 73–85.

  • Ghosh, S. and Guchhait, S. K., Characterization and evolution of primary and secondary laterites in northwestern Bengal Basin, West Bengal, India. J. Palaeogeogr., 2015, 4(2), 203–230.

  • Biswas, A., Laterites and lateritoids of Bengal. In Exploration in the Tropics (eds Datye, V. S.), K.R. Dikshit Felicitation Committee, Pune, 1987, pp. 157–167.

  • Ebisemiju, F. S., Thresholds of gully erosion in a lateritic terrain, Guyana. Singapore J. Trop. Geogr., 1989, 10(2), 136–143.

  • Samni, A. N., Ahmadi, H., Jafari, M., Boggs, G., Ghoddousi, J. and Malekian, A., Geomorphic threshold conditions for gully erosion in southwestern Iran (Boushehe–Samal watershed). J. Asian Earth Sci., 2009, 35(2), 180–189.

  • Begin, Z. B. and Schumm, S. A., Gradational thresholds and landform singularity; significance for quaternary morphology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1984, 56(3), 267–274.

  • Kar, A. and Bandyopadhyay, M. K., Mechanisms of rills: an investigation in microgeomorphology. Geogr. Rev. India, 1974, 36(3), 204–215.

  • Morgan, R. P. C., A simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised Morgan-Morgan-Finney model. Catena, 2001, 44, 305–322.

  • Morgan, R. P. C., Soil Erosion and Conservation, WileyBlackwell, New York, 2005.

  • Morgan, R. P. C. and Duzant, J. H., Modified MMF model for evaluating effects of crops and vegetation cover on soil erosion. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf., 2008, 32, 90–106.

  • Sarkar, A., Quantitative Geography: Techniques and Presentations, Orient Blackswan, New Delhi, 2013.

  • Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V., River flow forecasting through conceptual models–discussion and principles. J. Hydrol., 1970, 10, 282–290.

  • Cao, L., Zhang, K., Dai, H. and Liang, Y., Modelling inter-rill erosion on unpaved roads in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degrad. Dev., 2013, 26(8), 825–832.


Abstract Views: 336

PDF Views: 111




  • Estimation of Geomorphic Threshold in Permanent Gullies of Lateritic Terrain in Birbhum, West Bengal, India

Abstract Views: 336  |  PDF Views: 111

Authors

Sandipan Ghosh
Department of Geography, Chandrapur College, Chandrapur 713 145, India
Sanat Kumar Guchhait
Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, Barddhaman 713 104, India

Abstract


The present geomorphic study focusses on predicting threshold conditions and vulnerable locations where gully heads might develop in the lateritic terrain, located at the eastern plateau fringe of Rajmahal Basalt Traps, Birbhum, West Bengal, India. The modern concept of geomorphic threshold is applied here on gully erosion hazard to identify the critical slope of gully head (S) and upstream drainage area (A) with a core relationship of S = aA-b. Based on 118 gully heads we have statistically derived significant relationships between slope and drainage area (r = -0.55); overland flow (Q) and slope length (L; r = 0.694); relative shear stress (τ) and slope (r = 0.915); as well as overland flow detachment rate (H) and eroding force of overland flow (F; r = 0.980). The established S-A critical relationship, as geomorphic threshold, is expressed as S = 17.419A-0.2517, above which gully initiation occurred on the laterites. This equation can be used as a predictive model to locate the vulnerable un-trenched slopes (i.e. potential gully erosion locations) in other lateritic areas of West Bengal. The constant b value (0.2517) and Montgomery-Dietrich envelope suggest a relative dominance of overland flow (52.51% of sample gully heads) in the erosion processes. The result of erosion model predicts an annual soil loss of 2.33-19.9 kg m-2 year-1 due to overland flow above the gully heads.

Keywords


Geomorphic Threshold, Gully, Laterite, Overland Flow.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi03%2F478-485