Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Estimating Capacity of Hybrid Bus Rapid Transit Corridor


Affiliations
1 Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, India
2 Transportation Planning Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi 100 025, India
 

The main objective of this study is to estimate the capacity of hybrid bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor. By the term hybrid BRT corridor in context to this study, we mean a corridor in which buses have to operate in an exclusive environment as well as in a mixed traffic environment. Capacity is an important parameter to estimate corridor and system performance. Therefore to evaluate the same, Ahmedabad BRT system was chosen in the present study. On the basis of boarding alighting data, the busiest route comprising both segregated (exclusive environment) and unsegregated (mixed traffic environment) stretch was selected. For estimating the capacity, an empirical method was adopted. Bus lane capacity for segregated stretch and unsegregated stretch was estimated as 243 buses/h and 101 buses/h respectively. The overall capacity value of hybrid BRT corridor was minimum of the two, i.e. 101 buses/h. After estimating the capacity so obtained, the effect of mixed traffic environment on overall corridor capacity was observed.

Further, an attempt was made to estimate capacity using conventional Greenshield model on a mid-block section. Following this, the results of two approaches namely, empirical model capacity and capacity using Greenshield model were compared. The capacity obtained at mid-block section of the segregated stretch was overestimated by 19.34% or 290 buses/h compared to that obtained using empirical method (243 buses/h).


Keywords

Hybrid Bus Rapid Transit, Greenshield Model, Population, Traffic.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Verma, A., Sreenivasulu, S. and Dash, N., Achieving sustainable transportation system for Indian cities – problems and issues. Curr. Sci., 2011, 100(9), 1328–1339.

  • Verma, A. and Ramanayya, T. V., Public transport planning and management in developing countries. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(5), 914–916.

  • Population Census 2011 of India. Retrived from http://www.censusindia.gov.in on 21 March 2016.

  • Godavarthi, G. R., Chalumuri, R. S. and Velmurugun, S., Measuring the performance of bus rapid-transit transitways based on volume by capacity ratio. J. Transp. Eng., ASCE, 2014, 140(10), 1–12.

  • Thomas, E., Bus Rapid Transit, Presentation at the Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting, Chicago, 2001.

  • Hsu, L., Cost estimating model for mode choice between light rail and bus rapid transit systems. J. Transp. Eng., 2013, 20–29; 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000466.

  • Arasan, V. and Vedagiri, P., Microsimulation study of the effect of exclusive bus lanes on heterogeneous traffic flow. J. Urban Plan., ASCE, 2010, 136(1), 50–58.

  • TRB, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2013, 3rd edn.

  • Siddique, A. and Khan, A., Microscopic simulation approach to capacity analysis of bus rapid transit transitways. J. Public Transp., Spel. BRT Edn, 2006, 9(3), 181–200.

  • Fernandez, R. and Planzer, R., On the capacity of bus transit systems. Transport Rev., 2002, 22(3), 267–293.

  • Fernandez, R., Results of the microscopic modelling of traffic interactions at stops, junctions and roads for the design of bus rapid transit facilities. Paper presented at the Association for European Transport and Contributors, 2007.

  • Reilly, J. and Aros-Vera, F., Estimating capacity of high volume bus rapid transit stations. Paper Presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, National Academics, Washington, DC, 2013.

  • Jacques, K. and Levinson, H., TCRP Report 26: Operational analysis of bus lanes on arterials. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2013.

  • TRB, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2003, 2nd edn.

  • TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1985.

  • TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1994.

  • TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000.

  • TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2010.

  • Wright, L. and Hook, W., Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Planning Guide, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. New York, USA, 2007.

  • Gu, W., Li, Y., Cassidy, M. and Griswold, J., On the capacity of isolated, curbside bus stops. Transport. Res. Part B, 2011, 45(4), 714–723.

  • Sharma, A., Parida, M., Sekhar, R. C. and Kathuria, A., Capacity analysis of Bhopal BRTS using empirical and simulation model. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 2015, 11, 1575–1593.

  • Ortiz, M. and Bocarejo, J., Transmilenio BRT capacity determination using a microsimulation model in vissim. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, National Academics, Washington, DC, 2014.

  • Widanapathiranage, R., Bunker, J. M. and Bhaskar, A., A microscopic simulation model to estimate bus rapid transit station bus capacity. Paper presented at the Australasian Transport Research Forum Proceedings, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2013.

  • Siddharth, S. and Ramadurai, G., Calibration of VISSIM for Indian heterogeneous traffic conditions. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., 2013, 104, 380–389.

  • Holstein, W. and Soukup, W., Monte Carlo Simulation. Institute paper 23, Institute of Quantative Research and Economics and Management, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Prudue University, 1962.

  • Lownes, N. and Machemehl, R., Sensitivity of simulated capacity to modification of VISSIM driver behavior parameters. Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2006, pp. 102–110.

  • Fernandez, R., Modelling public transport stops by microscopic simulation. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 2010, 18(6), 856–868.

  • Chen, X., Yu, L., Zhu, L., Guo, J. and Sun, M., Microscopic traffic simulation approach to capacity impact analysis of weaving sections for exclusive bus lanes on an urban expressway. J. Transp. Eng., ASCE, 2010, 136(10), 895–902.


Abstract Views: 353

PDF Views: 124




  • Estimating Capacity of Hybrid Bus Rapid Transit Corridor

Abstract Views: 353  |  PDF Views: 124

Authors

Harprinderjot Singh
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, India
Ankit Kathuria
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, India
Ravi Sekhar
Transportation Planning Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi 100 025, India
M. Parida
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, India

Abstract


The main objective of this study is to estimate the capacity of hybrid bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor. By the term hybrid BRT corridor in context to this study, we mean a corridor in which buses have to operate in an exclusive environment as well as in a mixed traffic environment. Capacity is an important parameter to estimate corridor and system performance. Therefore to evaluate the same, Ahmedabad BRT system was chosen in the present study. On the basis of boarding alighting data, the busiest route comprising both segregated (exclusive environment) and unsegregated (mixed traffic environment) stretch was selected. For estimating the capacity, an empirical method was adopted. Bus lane capacity for segregated stretch and unsegregated stretch was estimated as 243 buses/h and 101 buses/h respectively. The overall capacity value of hybrid BRT corridor was minimum of the two, i.e. 101 buses/h. After estimating the capacity so obtained, the effect of mixed traffic environment on overall corridor capacity was observed.

Further, an attempt was made to estimate capacity using conventional Greenshield model on a mid-block section. Following this, the results of two approaches namely, empirical model capacity and capacity using Greenshield model were compared. The capacity obtained at mid-block section of the segregated stretch was overestimated by 19.34% or 290 buses/h compared to that obtained using empirical method (243 buses/h).


Keywords


Hybrid Bus Rapid Transit, Greenshield Model, Population, Traffic.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi08%2F1586-1592