Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Proactive Entrepreneurial Characteristics of Science and Technology Students:An Empirical Study in Indian Context


Affiliations
1 Department of Management Studies, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826 004, India
 

In this article we examine the entrepreneurial tendencies among science and technology (S&T) graduates in India. The study was carried out to understand the entrepreneurial psyche among S&T students from India-based institutions of national repute, i.e. Indian Institutes of Technology and National Institutes of Technology. We found that there is a low level of interest among students to pursue an entrepreneurial career. In the psychological context, factors such as self-efficacy, locus of control, innovativeness, achievement orientation were found to positively influence students’ entrepreneurial aspirations, but surprisingly not the risk taking propensity. Moreover, environmental factors such as existence of vital resources were found to motivate entrepreneurship. On policy implication per se, our finding concludes with suggestions to impart entrepreneurial knowledge through programmes especially designed for S&T graduates. Additionally, in the context of entrepreneurial ecosystem, policy makers can pave new dimensions by creating an environment that serves as a catalyst for high-tech venturing.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial Intention, Entrepreneurship Education, Science and Technology Graduates.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Gartner, W. B., What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? J. Bus. Venturing, 1990, 5(1), 15–28.

  • Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Manage. Rev., 2000, 25(1), 217–226.

  • Shane, S. A., A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA, 2003.

  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. and Ray, S., A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J. Bus. Venturing, 2003, 18(1), 105–123.

  • Brockhaus, R. H., The psychology of the entrepreneur. Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982, 39–57.

  • Brockhaus, R. H. and Horwitz, P., The psychology of the entrepreneur. In The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (eds Sexton, D. L. and Smilor, R. W.), Ballinger, Cambridge, 1986, pp. 25–48.

  • Furnham, A., Personality at Work: The Role of Individual Differences in the Workplace, Psychology Press, Routledge, 1994.

  • Krueger, N. F. and Brazeal, D. V., Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrep. Theory Pract., 1994, 18, 91.

  • Herron, L. and Sapienza, H. J., The entrepreneur and the initiation of new venture launch activities. Entrep.: Theory Pract., 1992, 17(1), 49–55.

  • Naffziger, D. W., Hornsby, J. S. and Kuratko, D. F., A proposed research model of entrepreneurial motivation. Entrepr.: Theory Pract., 1994, 18(3), 29–43.

  • Roberts, E. B., Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond, Oxford University Press, New York, 1991.

  • Kolvereid, L., Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrep.: Theory Pract., 1996, 21(1), 47–58.

  • Karr, A. R., Labor letter. The Wall Street J., 1 November 1985.

  • Wang, C. K. and Wong, P., Entrepreneurial interest of university students in Singapore. Technovation, 2004, 24, 163–172.

  • Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G. and Gatewood, E. J., The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing, 2003, 18(1), 13–39.

  • Shapero, A. and Sokol, L., The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Encyclopedia of Entrep., 1982, 72–90.

  • Ajzen, I., Attitudes, traits, and actions: dispositional prediction of behaviour in personality and social psychology. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 1987, 20(1), 1–63.

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D. and Carsrud, A. L., Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. J. Bus. Venturing, 2000, 15(5), 411–432.

  • Shapero, A., The Entrepreneurial Event. In Environment for Entrepreneurship (ed. Kent, C. A.), Lexington: Heath, 1984, pp. 21–40.

  • Autio, E., Keelyey, R., Klofsten, M. and Ulfstedt, T., Entrepreneurial intent among students: testing an intent model in Asia, Scandinavia and The United States. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1997.

  • Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behaviour. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes, 1991, 50(2), 179–211.

  • Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, 1997.

  • Rotter, J. B., Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol. Monogr.: General Appl., 1966, 80(1), 1.

  • Maddi, S. R., Kobasa, S. C. and Hoover, M., An alienation test. J. Humanist. Psychol., 1979, 19(4), 73–76.

  • Birney, R. C., Burdick, H. and Teevan, R. C., Fear of Failure, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1969.

  • Burnett, J. J., Internal–external locus of control as a moderator of fear appeals. J. Appl. Psychol., 1881, 66(3), 390.

  • Schumpeter, J. A., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Harvard University Press, 1934.

  • Hornaday, J. A. and Aboud, J., Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs 1. Pers. Psychol., 1971, 24(2), 141–153.

  • Timmons, J. A., Characteristics and role demands of entrepreneurship. Am. J. Small Bus., 1978, 3(1), 5–17.

  • Goldsmith, R. E. and Hofacker, C. F., Measuring consumer innovativeness. J. Acad. Market. Sci., 1991, 19(3), 209–221.

  • Schumpeter, J. A., The creative response in economic history. J. Econ. Hist., 1947, 7(02), 149–159.

  • Rauch, A. and Frese, M., Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: a meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol., 2007, 16(4), 353–385.

  • Cunningham, J. B. and Lischeron, J., Defining entrepreneurship. J. Small Business Manage., 1991, 29(1), 45–61.

  • Busenitz, L. W., Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision making it is a matter of perspective. J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 1999, 35(3), 325–340.

  • Palich, L. E. and Bagby, D. R., Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: challenging conventional wisdom. J. Bus. Venturing, 1995, 10(6), 425–438.

  • Ho, T. S. and Koh, H. C., Differences in psychological characteristics between entrepreneurially inclined and non-entrepreneurially inclined accounting graduates in Singapore. Entrep., Innov. Change: Int. J., 1992, 1(2), 243–254.

  • Bird, B., Entrepreneurial Behaviour, Scott Foresman, London, 1989.

  • McClelland, D. C., Clark, R. A., Roby, T. B. and Atkinson, J. W., The projective expression of needs. IV. The effect of the need for achievement on thematic apperception. J. Exp. Psychol., 1949, 39(2), 242.

  • McClelland, D. C., The Achievement Society, Princeton, NJ, Von Nostrand, 1961.

  • Schwartz, E. B., Entrepreneurship-New female frontier. J. Contemp. Bus., 1976, 5(1), 47–76.

  • Johnson, B. R., Toward a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: the case of achievement motivation and the entrepreneur. Entrep. Theory Pract., 1990, 14(3), 39–54.

  • Begley, T. M. and Boyd, D. P., Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. J. Bus. Venturing, 1987, 2(1), 79–93.

  • Boyd, N. G. and Vozikis, G. S., The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep. Theory Pract., 1994, 18, 63.

  • Collins, C. J., Hanges, P. J. and Locke, E. A., The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behaviour: a meta-analysis. Hum. Perform., 2004, 17(1), 95–117.

  • Rumelt, R. P., In Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (ed. Lamb, R.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984, pp. 556–570.

  • Alvarez, S. A. and Busenitz, L. W., The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. J. Manage., 2001, 27(6), 755–775.

  • Barney, J. B., Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manage. Sci., 1986, 32(10), 1231–1241.

  • Wernerfelt, B., A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Manage. J., 1984, 5(2), 171–180.

  • Kim, J. O. and Mueller, C. W., Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1978, vol. 14.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L., Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006, vol. 6.

  • Chye Koh, H., Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics: A study of Hong Kong MBA students. J. Manage. Psychol., 1996, 11(3), 12–25.

  • Linan, F. and Chen, Y. W., Development and cross‐cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepr. Theory Pract., 2009, 33(3), 593–617.

  • Levenson, H., Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 1973, 41(3), 397.

  • Linan, F., ‘Development and validation of an entrepreneurial intention questionnaire (EIQ)’, IntEnt05 Conference, Guildford (United Kingdom), 10–13 July 2005.

  • Rohrmann, B., Risk orientation questionnaire: attitudes towards risk decisions, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 1997.

  • De Noble, A. F., Jung, D. and Ehrlich, S. B., Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: the development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial action. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Res., 1999, 73–87.

  • do Paco, A., Ferreira, J. M., Raposo, M., Rodrigues, R. G. and Dinis, A., Entrepreneurial intentions: is education enough? Int. Entrep. Manage. J., 2015, 11(1), 57–75.

  • Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y., On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Market. Sci., 1988, 16(1), 74–94.

  • Terjesen, S., Hessels, J. and Li, D., Comparative international entrepreneurship a review and research agenda. J. Manage., 2016, 42(1), 299–344.

  • Luthje, C. and Franke, N., Entrepreneurial intentions of business students: a benchmarking study. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manage., 2004, 1(3). 269–288, ISSN 0267-5730.

  • Bird, B., Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Acad. Manage. Rev., 1988, 13(3), 442–453.

  • Cooper, A. C., Challenges in predicting new firm performance. J. Bus. Venturing, 1993, 8(3), 241–253.

  • Kolvereid, L., Growth aspirations among Norwegian entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing, 1992, 7(3), 209–222.

  • Vogt, W. P., Quantitative Research Methods for Professionals, Allyn and Bacon, Pearson Education, Boston, 2007.

  • Luthje, C. and Franke, N., Fostering entrepreneurship through university education and training: lessons from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In European Academy of Management 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm, 2002, pp. 9–11.

  • Bandura, A., Social Leaming Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977.


Abstract Views: 464

PDF Views: 115




  • Proactive Entrepreneurial Characteristics of Science and Technology Students:An Empirical Study in Indian Context

Abstract Views: 464  |  PDF Views: 115

Authors

Rajib Roy
Department of Management Studies, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826 004, India
Niladri Das
Department of Management Studies, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826 004, India

Abstract


In this article we examine the entrepreneurial tendencies among science and technology (S&T) graduates in India. The study was carried out to understand the entrepreneurial psyche among S&T students from India-based institutions of national repute, i.e. Indian Institutes of Technology and National Institutes of Technology. We found that there is a low level of interest among students to pursue an entrepreneurial career. In the psychological context, factors such as self-efficacy, locus of control, innovativeness, achievement orientation were found to positively influence students’ entrepreneurial aspirations, but surprisingly not the risk taking propensity. Moreover, environmental factors such as existence of vital resources were found to motivate entrepreneurship. On policy implication per se, our finding concludes with suggestions to impart entrepreneurial knowledge through programmes especially designed for S&T graduates. Additionally, in the context of entrepreneurial ecosystem, policy makers can pave new dimensions by creating an environment that serves as a catalyst for high-tech venturing.

Keywords


Entrepreneurial Intention, Entrepreneurship Education, Science and Technology Graduates.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi09%2F1692-1701