Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Drinking Water Contamination from Peri-Urban Bengaluru, India


Affiliations
1 School of Life Sciences, Trans-Disciplinary University, Bengaluru 560 064, India
 

The presence of diarrhoeagenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli in drinking water indicates faecal and sewage contamination. Testing the microbial quality of drinking water at source (n = 29) and households (n = 43) of 29 peri-urban villages of Bengaluru city, indicated that 80% and 93% of samples respectively were unfit for human consumption as per WHO standards, i.e. nil E. coli in 100 ml sample. This also indicated that water gets contaminated further at the point-of-use when compared to the source. Forty-one per cent of the source drinking water samples had high E. coli counts which in turn means that the residing population face moderate to high risk of diarrhoea. A longitudinal study of the microbial quality of drinking water at source of supply (n = 45) was undertaken five times over an eight-month period in a subset of eight villages. Only around 18% of the total samples were microbially safe with nil E. coli/100 ml. Microbial contamination was found to be lower in January and March (<30 CFU/100 ml E. coli) when compared to December, May and September (>150 CFU/100 ml). Samples from Chikkakuntanahalli and Kodiyalakeranahalli had ≥1000 CFU/100 ml E. coli. Total dissolved solids, calcium, magnesium, alkalinity and hardness in source drinking water of eight selected villages were beyond acceptable levels. The nitrate levels were consistently high and beyond WHO permissible levels. Alarming levels of microbial and chemical contamination of drinking water from the sites press for appropriate remedial measures to reduce health threats, particularly among vulnerable population.

Keywords

Microbial Contamination, Peri-Urban Bengaluru, Vrishabhavathi–Byramangala Reservoir, Water Quality.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • WHO, Recognition of safe water and sanitation as a human right, 2010; http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/recognition_safe_clean_water/en/ (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • WHO-UNICEF, Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: The urban and rural challenge of the decade, 2006; http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/jmpfinal.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • WHO, Water Sanitation and Health, 2008; http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/mdg1/en/ (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • WHO, WHO World Water Day Report, 2014. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/takingcharge.html (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • WHO, Unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene, 2010; http://www.who.int/publications/cra/chapters/volume2/1321-1352.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • WHO, Diarrhoeal disease, 2013; http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs330/en/ (accessed on 13 June 16).

  • CDC, Global water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH); 2013; http://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/global/wash_statistics.html (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • UNESCO, Water for a sustainable world, 2015; http://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/global/wash_statistics.html (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • WHO, Drinking-water, 2015; http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs391/en/ (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • World Bank, India Ground water: a valuable but diminishing resource, 2012; http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/03/06/india-groundwater-critical-diminishing (accessed on 13 June 2016).

  • Bartram, J. and Ballance, R., Water Quality Monitoring – A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes, UNEP/WHO, 1996.

  • WHO, Guidelines for drinking-water quality – Surveillance and control of community: supplies, 1997, vol. 3, 2nd edn, pp. 77–79.

  • BIS, Drinking water – Specification IS 10500: 1991: Indian Standard, 2012, Second Revision, pp. 1–6.

  • WHO, Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, Third edition incorporating the first and second addenda Volume 1, Recommendations, 2008, pp. 3–7.

  • Department of Mines and Geology, Ground water hydrology and ground water quality in and around Bangalore city, 2011, pp. 60, 80–81.

  • Jadhav, J. and Gopinath, D., Bacteriological quality of water and water borne diseases in Bangalore. Australiasian Med. J., 2010, 3(12), 803–807.

  • Latha, N. and Ramachandra Mohan, M., Evaluation of bacteriological water quality, Bangalore – in view of public health. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 2014, 2(1), 12–18.

  • Shankar, B. S., Balasubramanya, N. and Reddy, M. T., Hydrochemical assessment of the pollutants in ground waters of Vrishabhavathi Valley Basin in Bangalore (India). J. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2008, 50(2), 97–102.

  • Jayadev and Puttaih, E. T., Studies on heavy metals contamination in Vrishabhavathi river water and ground water of the surrounding river. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 2013, 4(1), 1–9.

  • Sivasakthivel, S. and Nandini, N., Health risk assessment of microbial water quality and bioaerosols emission from Byramangala Reservior, Karnataka, India. IJSR, 2014, 3(7), 510–514.

  • Jadhav, J. R. K. S. G. D., A study of socio-cultural factors, water quality and Diarrhoea in Bangalore. Int. J. Public Health, 2009, 1(1), 1–4.

  • Khayum, A., Nandini, N., Chandrashekar, J. S. and Durgesh, R., Assessment of drinking water quality of Bangalore west zsone, India – a case study. Environ. We. Int. J. Sci. Tech., 2011, 6, 113–122.

  • Madhukar, R. and Srikantaswamy, S., Impact of industrial effluents on the water quality of Vrishabavathi river and Byramangala lake in Bidadi industrial area, Karnataka, India. Int. J. Geol. Earth Env. Sci., 2013, 3(2), 132–141.

  • Sreedhara Nayaka, B. M., Jayaprakash and Ramakrishna, S., Bacteriological quality of drinking water around Vrishabhavathi valley of Bangalore, Karnataka. Asian Microbiol. Biotech. Env.. Sci., 2008, 10(4), 773–776.

  • Skariyachan, S., Lokesh, P., Rao, R., Kumar, A. U., Vasist, K. S. and Narayanappa, R., Pilot study on water pollution and characterization of multidrug-resistant superbugs from Byramangala tank, Ramanagara district, Karnataka, India. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2012, 185, 5483–5495.

  • Balasubramanya, N. and Shankar, B. S., Progressive deterioration of groundwater quality in Vrishabhavathi Valley Basin, Bangalore, India. Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng., 2014, 1(5) 61–66.

  • WHO, Nitrate and Nitrite in Drinking-water: Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 2011, pp. 1–31.

  • Shrivastavad, K., Chandra, T. P. and Yadav, S., Seasonal variation in bacterial contamination of drinking water in bilaspur city of Chhattisgarh state. Indian J. Sci. Res., 2014, 4(1), 185–190.

  • Bain, R., Cronk, R., Wright, J., Yang, H., Slaymaker, T. and Bartram, J., Faecal contamination of drinking-water in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med., 2014, 11(5), e1001644.

  • WHO/UNICEF, Progress on drinking water and sanitation update, 2012 and 2014, pp. 8–18.

  • Rose, A. et al., Solar disinfection of water for diarrhoeal prevention in southern India. Arch. Dis. Child, 2006, 91(2), 139–141.

  • Boisson, S., Stevenson, M., Shapiro, L., Kumar, V., Singh, L. P., Ward, D. and Clasen, T., Effect of household-based drinking water chlorination on diarrhoea among children under five in Orissa, India: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med., 2013, 10(8), e1001497.

  • Sudha, V. B., Ganesan, S., Pazhani, G. P., Ramamurthy, T., Nair, G. B. and Venkatasubramanian, P., Storing drinking-water in copper pots kills contaminating diarrhoeagenic bacteria. J. Health Popul. Nutr., 2012, 30(1), 17–21.


Abstract Views: 539

PDF Views: 100




  • Drinking Water Contamination from Peri-Urban Bengaluru, India

Abstract Views: 539  |  PDF Views: 100

Authors

G. Sheeba
School of Life Sciences, Trans-Disciplinary University, Bengaluru 560 064, India
Anjaneyulu Jalagam
School of Life Sciences, Trans-Disciplinary University, Bengaluru 560 064, India
Padma Venkatasubramanian
School of Life Sciences, Trans-Disciplinary University, Bengaluru 560 064, India

Abstract


The presence of diarrhoeagenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli in drinking water indicates faecal and sewage contamination. Testing the microbial quality of drinking water at source (n = 29) and households (n = 43) of 29 peri-urban villages of Bengaluru city, indicated that 80% and 93% of samples respectively were unfit for human consumption as per WHO standards, i.e. nil E. coli in 100 ml sample. This also indicated that water gets contaminated further at the point-of-use when compared to the source. Forty-one per cent of the source drinking water samples had high E. coli counts which in turn means that the residing population face moderate to high risk of diarrhoea. A longitudinal study of the microbial quality of drinking water at source of supply (n = 45) was undertaken five times over an eight-month period in a subset of eight villages. Only around 18% of the total samples were microbially safe with nil E. coli/100 ml. Microbial contamination was found to be lower in January and March (<30 CFU/100 ml E. coli) when compared to December, May and September (>150 CFU/100 ml). Samples from Chikkakuntanahalli and Kodiyalakeranahalli had ≥1000 CFU/100 ml E. coli. Total dissolved solids, calcium, magnesium, alkalinity and hardness in source drinking water of eight selected villages were beyond acceptable levels. The nitrate levels were consistently high and beyond WHO permissible levels. Alarming levels of microbial and chemical contamination of drinking water from the sites press for appropriate remedial measures to reduce health threats, particularly among vulnerable population.

Keywords


Microbial Contamination, Peri-Urban Bengaluru, Vrishabhavathi–Byramangala Reservoir, Water Quality.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi09%2F1702-1709