Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

National-Scale Inventory and Management of Heritage Sites And Monuments:Advantages and Challenges of Using Geospatial Technology


Affiliations
1 Regional Centres, National Remote Sensing Centre, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, India
2 Ministry of Culture, Government of India, New Delhi 110 011, India
3 Archeological Survey of India, New Delhi 110 023, India
 

India is a vibrant and culturally diverse country with more than 3600 heritage sites and monuments of national importance, of which only 36 are recognized as World Heritage Sites by UNESCO. These heritage sites and monuments are precious and non-renewable resources which need to be conserved, protected and monitored. Conventional along with emerging geospatial techniques are required to prepare databases and action plans to manage them effectively and efficiently. This article discusses ISRO’s efforts in the last decade in the field of archaeology using high-resolution remote sensing data in conjunction with GIS, GPS and other geospatial techniques in various applications like inventory and site management plans for a monument/site, cultural resources management plans for World Heritage Sites as well as in exploration archaeology and research for predictive location modelling in the identification of areas with high archaeological potential. Most of the projects have been executed in collaboration with major stakeholders involved in archaeology and in the process have institutionalized the use of geospatial technology to a large extent in operational and research activities.

Keywords

Cultural Resources Management, Geospatial Techniques, Heritage Sites and Monuments, Predictive Locational Modelling.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Osicki, A., A Review of Remote Sensing Application in Archaeological Research Geography 795.28 (333), 2000; http://people.ucalgary.ca/~aaosicki/RS_Arky.pdf (accessed on 17 January 2017).

  • Ramasamy, S. M., Venkatasubramaniam, V., Riaz Abdullah, S. and Balaji, S., The phenomenon of river migration in northern Tamil Nadu – evidences from satellite data, archaeology and Tamil literature. Man Environ., 1992, XVII(1), 13–25.

  • Ramasamy, S. M., Saravanavel, J., Yadava, M. G. and Ramesh, R., Radiocarbon dating of some palaeochannels in Tamil Nadu and their significance. Curr. Sci., 2006, 91(12), 1609–1613.

  • Rajani, M. B. and Rajawat, A. S., Potential of satellite based sensors for studying distribution of archeological sites along palaeochannels: Harappan sites a case study. J. Archeol. Sci., 2010; doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.04.05

  • Rajani, M. B. and Kasturirangan, K., Sea-level changes and its impact on coastal archaeological monuments: Seven Pagodas of Mahabalipuram. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2012, doi:10.1007/s12524-012-0210.

  • Nageswara Rao, K., Udayabhaskara Rao, Ch. and Srinivasa Rao, K., Significance of remote sensing for geomorphic mapping in archaeological investigations. Man Environ., 1997, XXII(2), 67–72.

  • Pappu, S., Kumar, A., Ravindranath, S. and Uday Raj, Applications of satellite remote sensing for research and heritage management in Indian prehistory. J. Archaeol. Sci., 2010; doi:10.10.1016/j.jas.2010.4.05

  • Pappu, S., Kumar, A., Ravindranath, S., Uday Raj and Gunnell, Y., Research and management of palaeolithic resources in Tamil Nadu, South India. Antiquity Project Gallery online, 2010; http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/pappu325/

  • Pappu, S., Kumar, A., Ravindranath, S. and Uday Raj, From stone tools to satellites: recent research into the prehistory of Tamil, Ancient India. Bull. Archaeol. Surv. India, 2011, New Series 1, 87–100.

  • Ray, H. P. and Ravindranath, S., The archaeology of ritual spaces: satellite images and Early Chalukyan temples. Man Environ., 2007, XXXII(1), 89–101.

  • Venugopala Rao, K., Ramesh, B., Bhavani, S. V. L. and Kamini, J., Remote sensing utility in urban and regional planning. Technical Report: Remote Sensing Applications, NRSC Publication, Hyderabad, 2010, pp. 109–132.

  • Uday Raj, Poonacha, K. P. and Adiga, S., Ruins of Hampi from high resolution satellite data: a case study. In Remote Sensing and Archaeology (ed. Tripathy, A.), Sandeep Prakashan, New Delhi, 2005, pp. 90–98.

  • Rajani, M. B., Bhattacharya, S. and Rajawat, A. S., Synergistic application of optical and radar data for archaeological exploration in the Talakadu region, Karnataka, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2011, 519–527; doi:10.1007/s12524-011-0102-6.

  • NNRMS Bulletin, 2001, 26, Department of Space publication, Bengaluru.

  • Thakker, P. S., Raval, M. H. and Dasgupta, A. R., Ancient ports of Gujarat, 2002; http://www.gisdevelopment.net/article/ancient-ports-of-gujarat

  • Box, P., GIS and Cultural Resource Management: A Manual for Heritage Managers, UNESCO, Bangkok, 1998.

  • Pappu, S., Kumar, A., Ravindranath, S. and Uday Raj, A forgotten heritage: impact assessment studies at prehistoric sites in Tamil Nadu. In Space, Time and Place, Third International Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology (eds Forte, M., Campana, S. and Liuzza, C.), BAR International Series 2118, Oxford, 17–21 August 2009, pp. 253–263.


Abstract Views: 470

PDF Views: 223




  • National-Scale Inventory and Management of Heritage Sites And Monuments:Advantages and Challenges of Using Geospatial Technology

Abstract Views: 470  |  PDF Views: 223

Authors

Uday Raj
Regional Centres, National Remote Sensing Centre, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, India
N. K. Sinha
Ministry of Culture, Government of India, New Delhi 110 011, India
Rakesh Tewari
Archeological Survey of India, New Delhi 110 023, India

Abstract


India is a vibrant and culturally diverse country with more than 3600 heritage sites and monuments of national importance, of which only 36 are recognized as World Heritage Sites by UNESCO. These heritage sites and monuments are precious and non-renewable resources which need to be conserved, protected and monitored. Conventional along with emerging geospatial techniques are required to prepare databases and action plans to manage them effectively and efficiently. This article discusses ISRO’s efforts in the last decade in the field of archaeology using high-resolution remote sensing data in conjunction with GIS, GPS and other geospatial techniques in various applications like inventory and site management plans for a monument/site, cultural resources management plans for World Heritage Sites as well as in exploration archaeology and research for predictive location modelling in the identification of areas with high archaeological potential. Most of the projects have been executed in collaboration with major stakeholders involved in archaeology and in the process have institutionalized the use of geospatial technology to a large extent in operational and research activities.

Keywords


Cultural Resources Management, Geospatial Techniques, Heritage Sites and Monuments, Predictive Locational Modelling.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi10%2F1934-1947