Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

M 6.7, 4 January 2016 Imphal Earthquake:Dismal Performance of Publicly-Funded Buildings


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, India
2 Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Guwahati, Guwahati 781 039, India
3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IIT Patna, Bihta 801 103, India
 

The M 6.7 Imphal Earthquake of 4 January 2016 caused devastation in Manipur state and adjoining areas. This event presented another opportunity to understand the earthquake risk of the affected region as well as of the North-Eastern Himalayan region, which have similar patterns of seismicity, built environment and construction practices. Many dramatic collapses and damages, especially to publicly-funded buildings were disproportionate to the observed intensity of shaking. This was primarily due to poor compliance with seismic codes, inferior quality of raw materials and shoddy workmanship. Consequently, the seismic risk in the region is growing at an alarming pace with increasing inventory of vulnerable construction. This article discusses seismic performance of three publicly-funded buildings in the recent earthquake and highlights the vulnerability of such inventories along with the below par preparedness of the government agencies in dealing with such calamities. This event should be regarded as a preview of what is likely to happen in the event of a greater shaking expected for the region and should hasten the community to take necessary steps to identify seismic vulnerabilities and improve construction practices through effective intervention.

Keywords

Earthquake Effects, Reinforced Concrete Frame, Seismic Vulnerability.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Singh, A. P., Rao, N. P., Kumar, M. R., Hsieh, M. C. and Zhao, L., Role of the Kopili Fault in deformation tectonics of the IndoBurmese arc inferred from the rupture process of the 3 January 2016 Mw 6.7 Imphal earthquake. B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2017, 102, 1041–1047.

  • Hurukawa, N. and Maung, M. P., Two seismic gaps on the Sagaing Fault, Myanmar, derived from relocation of historical earthquakes since 1918. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2011, 38, L01310.

  • Chen, W. P. and Molnar, P., Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong plateau and northern Indo-Burman ranges. J. Geophys. Res., 1990, 95, 12,527–12,552.

  • Kumar, D., Reddy, D. V. and Pandey, A. K., Paleoseismic investigations in the Kopili fault zone of North East India: Evidences from liquefaction chronology. Tectonophysics, 2016, 674, 65–75.

  • Person, W. J. (ed.), Seismological notes – January–February, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1988, 78, 2115–2119.

  • US Geological Survey, M 6.7–30 km W of Imphal, India, 24 January 2016; http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10004b2n#executive

  • Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1 – General provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2002, IS: 1893 (Part 1).

  • Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H. and Kanamori, H, Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthq. Spectra, 1999, 15, 557–564.

  • Linkimer, L., Relationship between peak ground acceleration and modified Mercalli intensity in Costa Rica. Rev. Geol. Am. Central, 2008, 38, 81–94.

  • Indian standard ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces – Code of practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1993, IS: 13920.

  • Indian standard seismic evaluation and strengthening of existing reinforced concrete buildings – Guidelines, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2013, IS: 15988.

  • Indian standard seismic evaluation, repair and strengthening of masonry buildings – Guidelines, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2009, IS: 13935.

  • Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete – Code of practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2002, IS: 456.

  • Kaushik, H. B. and Dasgupta, K., Assessment of seismic vulnerability of structures in Sikkim, India, based on damage observation during two recent earthquakes. J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 2013, 27, 697–720.

  • Rai, D. C., Mondal, G., Singhal, V., Parool, N., Pradhan, T. and Mitra, K., Reconnaissance report of the M 6.9 Sikkim (India–Nepal border) earthquake of 18 September 2011. Geomat. Nat. Haz. Risk, 2012, 3, 99–111.


Abstract Views: 239

PDF Views: 117




  • M 6.7, 4 January 2016 Imphal Earthquake:Dismal Performance of Publicly-Funded Buildings

Abstract Views: 239  |  PDF Views: 117

Authors

Durgesh C. Rai
Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, India
Hemant B. Kaushik
Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Guwahati, Guwahati 781 039, India
Vaibhav Singhal
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IIT Patna, Bihta 801 103, India

Abstract


The M 6.7 Imphal Earthquake of 4 January 2016 caused devastation in Manipur state and adjoining areas. This event presented another opportunity to understand the earthquake risk of the affected region as well as of the North-Eastern Himalayan region, which have similar patterns of seismicity, built environment and construction practices. Many dramatic collapses and damages, especially to publicly-funded buildings were disproportionate to the observed intensity of shaking. This was primarily due to poor compliance with seismic codes, inferior quality of raw materials and shoddy workmanship. Consequently, the seismic risk in the region is growing at an alarming pace with increasing inventory of vulnerable construction. This article discusses seismic performance of three publicly-funded buildings in the recent earthquake and highlights the vulnerability of such inventories along with the below par preparedness of the government agencies in dealing with such calamities. This event should be regarded as a preview of what is likely to happen in the event of a greater shaking expected for the region and should hasten the community to take necessary steps to identify seismic vulnerabilities and improve construction practices through effective intervention.

Keywords


Earthquake Effects, Reinforced Concrete Frame, Seismic Vulnerability.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi12%2F2341-2350