Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Recognizing the Rapid Expansion of Rubber Plantation – A Threat to Native Forest in Parts of Northeast India


Affiliations
1 North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Umiam 793 103, India
2 Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India
 

With the current trend of land use/land cover (LULC) change taking place globally, several parts of northeast India are also showing signs of change in LULC pattern leading to forest loss. This study focusses on the expansion of monoculture rubber plantation (Hevea brasiliensis) in selected sub-watersheds in north-east India, and distributed in parts of north Tripura, Mizoram and a major portion in the Karimganj district of Assam. Remote sensing and GIS technique has been used to map and analyse the extent of rubber plantation using temporal IRS LISS III satellite data from 1997 to 2013. It has been observed that rubber plantation increased from 4.47 sq. km to 28.42 sq. km in various parts of the study area. The expansion was more rapid during recent times, i.e. during 2010 to 2013. The plantation took place in dense forest, open forest and degraded forest areas. The spread of the plantation was also observed in one reserved forest located within the study area. There are several instances of negative impacts of rubber plantation expansion in Southeast Asia. Similar expansion of rubber plantation has been observed in northeast India as well. Further spread of rubber plantations in the region needs to be regulated to avoid conversion of dense and reserved forest areas by fostering use of mixed cropping methods instead of rubber monocultures, and by adopting more sustainable land use and management practices.

Keywords

Northeast India, Remote Sensing and GIS, Rubber Plantation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Rubber Board, Rubber Growers Companion, Government of India, Kottayam, Kerala, India, 2005, p. 115.

  • Fox, J. M., Vogler, J. B., Sen, O. L., Giambelluca, T. W. and Ziegler A. D., Simulating land-cover change in montane mainland southeast Asia. Environ. Manage., 2012, 49, 968–979.

  • Mertz, O., Padoch, C., Fox, J., Cramb, R. A., Leisz, S. J. and Lam, N. T., Swidden change in Southeast Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Hum. Ecol., 2009, 37, 259–264.

  • Leisz, S. J., Yasuyuki, K., Fox, J., Masayuki, Y. and Rambo, T. A., Land use changes in the uplands of Southeast Asia: proximate and distant causes. J. Southeast Asian Stud., 2009, 47(3), 237–243.

  • Thongmanivong, S., Fujita, Y., Phanvilay, K. and Vongvisouk, T., Agrarian land use transformation in Northern Laos: from swidden to rubber. J. Southeast Asian Stud., 2009, 47(3), 330–347.

  • Shrestha, A. B. and Devkota, L. P., Climate Change in the Eastern Himalayas: Observed Trends and Model Projections Climate Change Impact and Vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas – Technical Report 1, Kathmandu, ICIMOD, 2010.

  • Li, H., Ma Y., Aide, T. M. and Liu, W., Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and the implications for carbon dynamics. For. Ecol. Manage, 2008, 255, 16–24.

  • Hu, H., Liu, W. and Cao, M., Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2008, 46(1–3), 147–156.

  • Guardiola-Claramonte, M., Troch, P. A., Ziegler, A. D., Giambelluca, T. W., Durcik, M. and Vogler, J. B., Hydrologic effects of the expansion of rubber (Heveabrasiliensis) in a tropical catchment. Ecohydrology, 2010, 306–314.

  • Mann, C. C., Addicted to rubber. Science, 2009, 325, 565–566.

  • Ziegler, A. D., Fox, J. M. and Xu, J., The rubber juggernaut. Science, 2009, 324, 1024–1025.

  • Hunter Jr., M. L. (ed.), Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, p. 716.

  • Hartley, M. J., Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For. Ecol. Manage., 2002, 155, 81–95.

  • Allen, R. B., Platt, K. H. and Coker, R. E. J., Understorey species composition patterns in a Pinus radiata D. Don plantation on the central North Island volcanic plateau, New Zealand. New Zealand J. For. Sci., 1995, 25, 301–317.

  • Thomas, E. W., Dolman, P. M. and Edwards, D. P., Increasing demand for natural rubber necessitates a robust sustainability initiative to mitigate impacts on tropical biodiversity. Conserv. Lett., 2015, 8(4), 230–241.

  • Ahrends, A., Hollingsworth, P. M., Ziegler, A. D., Fox, J. M., Chen, H., Su, Y. and Xu, J., Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods. Glob. Environ. Change, 2015, 34, 48–58.

  • International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), Encouraging Industrial Forest Plantations in the Tropics: Report of a Global Study, International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan, 2009.

  • Puyravaud, J. P., Davidar, P. and Laurance, W. F., Cryptic destruction of India’s native forests. Conserv. Lett., 2010, 3, 390–394.

  • Chen, H., Yi, Z.-F., Schmidt-Vogt, D., Ahrends, A., Beckschäfer, P. and Kleinn, C., Pushing the limits: the pattern and dynamics of rubber monoculture expansion in Xishuangbanna, SW China. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(2), e0150062; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150062.

  • Thomas, E. W., Dolman, P. M. and Edwards, D. P., Increasing demand for natural rubber necessitates a robust sustainability initiative to mitigate impacts on tropical biodiversity. Conserv. Lett., 2015, 8(4), 230–241.

  • Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC), India’s North East diversifying growth opportunities, ICC-PWC Report 2013, India.

  • http://databank.nedfi.com/content/ner-databank

  • Krishnakumar, Rubber Planters Conference, India, A review of extension and development strategies in Rubber, Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottyam, Kerala, 2002, p. 341.

  • Rubber Board of India (RBI), Bulletins, Kerala. Govt of India 2013; http://rubberboard.org.in/Publication.asp.

  • Roy, M., Saha, A. and Roy, M., Ecological impact of rubber plantations: Tripura perspective. Int. J. Curr. Res., 2014, 2(11), 10334–10340.

  • Mazumdar, A., Datta, S., Choudhary, B. K. and Mazumdar, K., Do extensive rubber plantation influences local environment? A case study from Tripura, Northeast India. Curr. World Environ., 2014, 9(3), 768–779.

  • Ziegler, A. D., Phelps, J. and Yuen, J. Q., Carbon outcomes of major land-cover transitions in SE Asia: great uncertainties and REDD+ policy implications. Global Change. Biol., 2012, 18, 3087–3099.

  • Li, H., Youxin, Ma, T., Mitchell, A. and Wenjun, L., Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and implications for carbon dynamics. For. Ecol. Manage., 2008, 255, 16–24.

  • Li, S., Zou,, F., Zhang, Q. and Sheldon, F. H., Species richness and guild composition in rubber plantations compared to secondary forest on Hainan Island, China. Agrofor. Syst., 2013, 87, 1117–1128.

  • Guardiola-Claramonte, M., Troch, P. A., Ziegler, A. D., Giambelluca, T. W., Vogler, J. B. and Nullet, M. A., Local hydrologic effects of introducing non-native vegetation in a tropical catchment. Ecohydrology, 2008, 1, 13–22.

  • DeBlécourt, M., Brumme, R., Xu, J., Corre, M. D. and Veldkamp, E., Soil carbon stocks decrease following conversion of secondary forests to rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8, e69357.

  • Zhang, H., Zhang, G. L., Zhao, Y. G., Zhao, W. J. and Qi, Z. P., Chemical degradation of a Ferralsol (Oxisol) under intensive rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) farming in tropical China. Soil Tillage Res., 2007, 93(1), 109–116.

  • Warren-Thomas, E., Dolman, P. M. and Edwards, D. P., Increasing demand for natural rubber necessitates a robust sustainability initiative to mitigate impacts on tropical biodiversity. Conserv. Lett., 2015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12170.

  • Jacob, C. K. and Liyanage, A. de S., Diseases of economic importance in rubber. In Natural Rubber: Biology, Cultivation and Technology (eds Sethuraj, M. R. and Mathew, N. T.), Dev. Crop Sci., Elsevier, Amsterdam and New York, 1992, vol. 23, pp. 324–359.

  • Jayasinghe, C. K., Pests and diseases of Hevea rubber and their geographical distribution. Bull. Rubber Res. Inst. Sri Lanka, 1999, 40, 1–8.

  • Liyanage, K. K., Khan, S., Mortimer, P. E., Hyde, K. D., Xu, J., Brooks, S. and Ming, Z., Powdery mildew disease of rubber tree. For. Pathol., 2016, 46(2), 90–103.

  • Bartholomé, E. and Belward, A., GLC 2000: a new approach to global land covers mapping from Earth observation data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2005, 26, 1959–1977.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), FAOSTAT, 2013; http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E

  • Viswanathan, P. K., Emerging smallholder rubber farming systems in India and Thailand: a comparative economic analysis. Asian J. Agric. Develop. (AJAD), 2008, 5(2), 1–19.

  • North Eastern Council (NEC), North Eastern region Vision 2020, 2008, p. 77.

  • Fox, J. M., Castella, J. C., Ziegler, A. D. and Westlay, S. B., Rubber plantation expand in mountainous southeast Asia: what are the consequences for the environment? Asia Pacific Issues, Analysis from the East-West Centre, 2014, p. 114.

  • Oku, E., Iwara, A. and Ekukinam, E., Effects of age of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell Arg.) plantation on pH, organic carbon, organic matter, nitrogen and micronutrient status of ultisols in the humid forest zone of Nigeria, Kasetsart. J. Nat. Sci., 2012, 46, 684–693.

  • Monkai, J., Hyde, A. D., Xu, J. and Mortimer, P. E., Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities in rubber plantations. Fungal Biol. Rev., 2016; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2016.08.003

  • http://www.cirad.fr/en/research-operations/research-results/2013/rubber-intercropping-with-coffee-or cocoa-is more-profitable-than-monocropping

  • Snoeck, D., Lacote, R., Keli, J., Doumbia, A., Chapuset, T., Jagoret, P. and Gohet E., Association of Hevea with other tree crops can be more profitable than Hevea monocrop during first 12 years. Ind. Crops Prod., 2013, 48, 578–586.

  • Jessy, M. D., Joseph, P. and George, S., Possibilities of diverse rubber based agroforestry systems for smallholdings in India. Agroforestry Syst., 2016; doi:10.1007/s 10457-016-9953-8.


Abstract Views: 411

PDF Views: 144




  • Recognizing the Rapid Expansion of Rubber Plantation – A Threat to Native Forest in Parts of Northeast India

Abstract Views: 411  |  PDF Views: 144

Authors

Kasturi Chakraborty
North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Umiam 793 103, India
S. Sudhakar
North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Umiam 793 103, India
K. K. Sarma
North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Umiam 793 103, India
P. L. N. Raju
North Eastern Space Applications Centre, Umiam 793 103, India
Ashesh Kr. Das
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India

Abstract


With the current trend of land use/land cover (LULC) change taking place globally, several parts of northeast India are also showing signs of change in LULC pattern leading to forest loss. This study focusses on the expansion of monoculture rubber plantation (Hevea brasiliensis) in selected sub-watersheds in north-east India, and distributed in parts of north Tripura, Mizoram and a major portion in the Karimganj district of Assam. Remote sensing and GIS technique has been used to map and analyse the extent of rubber plantation using temporal IRS LISS III satellite data from 1997 to 2013. It has been observed that rubber plantation increased from 4.47 sq. km to 28.42 sq. km in various parts of the study area. The expansion was more rapid during recent times, i.e. during 2010 to 2013. The plantation took place in dense forest, open forest and degraded forest areas. The spread of the plantation was also observed in one reserved forest located within the study area. There are several instances of negative impacts of rubber plantation expansion in Southeast Asia. Similar expansion of rubber plantation has been observed in northeast India as well. Further spread of rubber plantations in the region needs to be regulated to avoid conversion of dense and reserved forest areas by fostering use of mixed cropping methods instead of rubber monocultures, and by adopting more sustainable land use and management practices.

Keywords


Northeast India, Remote Sensing and GIS, Rubber Plantation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi01%2F207-213