Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Name Confusions in Indian Cycads


Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, University College of Science, Saifabad, Hyderabad 500 004, India
2 Environment Protection Training and Research Institute, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 048, India
3 Mahatma Gandhi Botanical Garden, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru 560 065, India
 

Linnaeus described the genus Cycas with the lone species C. circinalis L. from India, which was based on Rheede’s, Hortus malabaricus. Roxburgh included three species, viz. C. circinalis Willd., C. revoluta Thunb. and C. sphaerica Roxb. All three were reportedly introduced in the Botanical Garden, Howrah during 1798–99 from different countries (C. circinalis, Indonesia; C. sphaerica, Moluccas and C. revoluta cultivated in West Bengal gardens).
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Linnaeus, C., Species Plantarum, Engelmann, Weinheim, Germany, 1753, Vol. 1, p. 1188.

  • Rheede, H. A., Hortus malabaricus, van Somera, van Dyck and Boom, Amsterdam, 1682, vol. 3, pp. 17–24.

  • Roxburgh, W., Flora Indica and Descriptions of Indian Plants, Thacker, Calcutta, 1832, vol. 3, pp. 744–749.

  • Dyer, W. T., In The Flora of British India (ed. Hooker, J. D.), Reeve, London, 1888, vol. 5, pp. 655–658.

  • Sahni, K. C., Gymnosperms of India and Adjacent Countries, Bishen Singh & Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 1990, pp. 25–32.

  • Hill, K. D., Taxon, 1995, 44, 23–31.

  • Lindstrom, A. J. and Hill, K. D., Telopea, 2007, 11(4), 463–488.

  • Prasad, K. et al., Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res., 2015, 4(9), 473–476.

  • Singh, L., Nord. J. Bot., 2017, 35(1), 69–76.

  • Pant, D. D., An Introduction to Gymnosperms, Cycas and Cycadales, Botanical Survey of India, Lucknow, 2002, pp. 51–52.

  • Singh, R. and Radha, P., Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 2008, 158, 430–435.

  • Ranjay, K. S. et al., IJTK, 2010, 9(3), 430–431.

  • Haines, H. H., The Botany of Bihar and Orissa, Adlard, London, 1924, vol. 6, p. 1228.

  • Singh, R., et al., Asian J. Conserv. Biol., 2015, 4(1), 3–14.

  • Singh, R. and Radha, P., Brittonia, 2006, 58(2), 119–123.

  • Srivastava, R. C., Indian J. Plant Sci., 2014, 3(1), 109–110.

  • Srivastava, R. C. and Jana, B., Indian J. Plant Sci., 2014, 3(2), 151–153.

  • Srivastava, R. C. and Singh, L., Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol., 2015, 2(8), 35–37.

  • McNeill, J. et al. (eds), International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code). Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress, ARG Gantner Verlag KG, Regnum Veg. 154, 2012.


Abstract Views: 614

PDF Views: 153




  • Name Confusions in Indian Cycads

Abstract Views: 614  |  PDF Views: 153

Authors

M. Venkat Ramana
Department of Botany, University College of Science, Saifabad, Hyderabad 500 004, India
P. Venu
Environment Protection Training and Research Institute, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 048, India
M. Sanjappa
Mahatma Gandhi Botanical Garden, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru 560 065, India

Abstract


Linnaeus described the genus Cycas with the lone species C. circinalis L. from India, which was based on Rheede’s, Hortus malabaricus. Roxburgh included three species, viz. C. circinalis Willd., C. revoluta Thunb. and C. sphaerica Roxb. All three were reportedly introduced in the Botanical Garden, Howrah during 1798–99 from different countries (C. circinalis, Indonesia; C. sphaerica, Moluccas and C. revoluta cultivated in West Bengal gardens).

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi02%2F269-272