Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Contributions of Plant Taxonomy, Herbarium and Field Germplasm Bank to Conservation of Threatened Plants:Case Studies from the Himalayas and Eastern and Western Ghats


Affiliations
1 TDU, Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions, Bengaluru 560 106, India
2 Botanical Survey of India, Shillong 793 003, India
3 Department of Botany, Goa University, Goa 403 206, India
4 Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
5 CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute (NBRI), Lucknow 226 001, India
6 Botanical Survey of India, Dehradun 786 006, India
7 Regional Plant Resource Centre (RPRC), Bhubaneswar 751 105, India
8 Department of Botany, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781 014, India
9 Department of Botany, Tripura University, Agartala 799 022, India
10 Department of Botany, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur 515 003, India
 

Conservation of biodiversity, a growing concern today, faces multiple challenges. Although ecosystem approach has been recommended as a solution, conservation of threatened species is difficult as they are spread across the ecosystems and are often restricted to microhabitats. In this article, the importance of taxonomy, herbarium and field germplasm bank in conservation of threatened species is discussed. It is concluded that individually each of these measures has important role to play in conservation. They also complement each other in reversing the threat perspective of the species.

Keywords

Biodiversity, Conservation, Germplasm Bank, Herbarium, Taxonomy.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Pandey, H. N. and Barik, S. K., Ecology, Diversity and Conservation of Plants and Ecosystems in India, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, 2006.

  • Cardinale, B. J. et al., The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot., 2011, 98, 572–592.

  • Joppa, L. N., Roberts, D. L. and Pimm, S. L., How many species of flowering plants are there? Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2011, 278, 554–559.

  • Irwin, S. J. and Narasimhan, D., Endemic genera of angiosperms in India: a review. Rheedea, 2011, 21(1), 87–105.

  • Nayar, M. P., Hotspots of Endemic Plants of India, Nepal and Bhutan, TBGRI, Thiruvananthapuram, 1996.

  • Nayar, M. P. and Sastry, A. R. K. (eds), Red Data Book of Indian Plants, Vol I–III, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, 1987–1990.

  • Mudgal, V. and Hajra, P. K. (eds), Floristic Diversity and Conservation Strategies in India, Vol I–III in the Context of States and Union Territories, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, 1999.

  • Reddy, S. C., Catalogue of invasive alien flora of India. Life Sci. J., 2008, 5(2), 84–89.

  • Hajra, P. K. and Mudgal, V., Plant Diversity Hotspots in India: An Overview, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, 1997.

  • Singh, P., Dash, S. S. and Kumar, S., New additions to the Indian flora in 2013. Phytotaxonomy, 2015, 15, 1–14.

  • Anon., Plant Discoveries, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, 2014.

  • Hooker, J. D., The Flora of British India, L. Reeve & Co, London, 1872–93, 6 vols.

  • Kanjilal, U. N., Kanjilal, P. C., Das, A., De, R. N. and Bor, N. L., Flora of Assam, Government Press, Shillong, 1934–1940, vols. 1–5.

  • Geetha, S., Comparative studies using conventional and traditional approaches on propagation of selected medicinal plants. Ph D thesis, Manipal University, 2015.

  • Bennet, S. S. R., Name Changes in Flowering Plants of India and Adjacent Regions, Triseas Publishers, Dehradun, 1987.

  • Haridasan, K. and Rao, R. R., Forest Flora of Meghalaya, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 1987, 2 vols. pp. 548–560.

  • Hoo, G. and Tseng, C. J., On the Chinese species of Panax Linn. Acta Phytotaxon. Sin., 1973, 11, 436.

  • Nongbri, L. B. and Barik, S. K., Personal communication, 2017.

  • Pandey, A. K., Ali, M. A. and Mao, A. A., Genus Panax L. (Araliaceae) in India. Pleione, 2007, 1, 51–56.

  • Pandey, A. K., Ali, M. A., Biate, D. L. and Misra, A. K., Molecular systematics of Aralia–Panax complex (Araliaceae) in India based on ITS sequences of nrDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India, Sect. B, 2009, 79, 255–261.

  • Henry, A. N. and Bose, C., An Aid to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, 1980.

  • Mudgal, U. and Jain, S. K., Coptis teeta Wall. local uses, distribution and cultivation. Bull. Bot. Surv. India, 1980, 22, 179–180.

  • Basu, S. K., Rattans (canes) in India – a monographic revision. Rattans Information Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1992.

  • Rao, R. R., Floristic diversity of Eastern Himalaya – a national heritage for conservation. In Himalayan Biodiversity (ed. Dhar, U.), Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, 1993, p. 139.

  • Seethalakshmi, K. K. and Muktesh Kumar, M. S., Bamboos of India: A Compendium, INBAR & KFRI, Thrissur, 1998.

  • Renuka, C., Genetic diversity and conservation of rattans. In Bamboo and Rattan Genetic Resources and Uses (eds Rao, U. R. and Rao, A. N.), IPGRI, Singapore and INBAR, New Delhi, 1995, pp. 39–45.

  • Renuka, C., Indian rattans – their diversity and conservation. In Taxonomy and Plant Conservation (eds Manilal, K. S. and Pandey, A. K.), CBS Publishers, New Delhi, 1996.

  • Basu, S. K. and Chakraverty, R. K., Calamus inermis T. Anders. In Red Data Book of Indian Plants (eds Nayar, M. P. and Sastry, A. R. K.), Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, 1990, vol. 3, p. 31.

  • Mao, A. A., The genus Rhododendron in north east India. Bot. Orientalis, 2010, 7, 26–34.

  • Dessai, J. R. N. and Janarthanam, M. K., The genus Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) in the northern and parts of central Western Ghats. Rheedea, 2011, 21, 23–80.

  • Panda, P. C. and Das, P., Identification, nomenclature and distribution of some rare plants of Orissa and adjoining states of India. Rheedea, 1997, 7(1), 57–63.

  • Panda, P. C. and Kamila, P. K., Population structure and conservation status of Lasiococca comberi Haines and Hypericumgaitii in India. Plant Sci. Res., 2016, 38, 1–2.

  • Barik, S. K., Chrungoo, N. K. and Adhikari, D., Conservation of Threatened Plants of India – A Manual of Methods, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, 2012.

  • Pandey, A. K., Dwivedi, M. D. and Gholami, A., Reproductive biology data in plant systematics: an overview. Int. J. Plant Reprod. Biol., 2016, 8(1), 65–74.

  • Jain, S. K. and Rao, R. R., A Handbook of Field and Herbarium Methods, Today and Tomorrow Publishers, New Delhi, 1977.

  • Tewari, R., Utility of herbarium resources for seed collections. Indian J. For., 2006, 29(4), 435–438.

  • Nayar, M. P., Endemism and pattern of distribution of endemic genera (angiosperms). J. Econ. Taxon. Bot., 1980, 1, 99–110.

  • Jain, S. K. and Rao, R. R., An Assessment of Threatened Plants of India, Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, 1983.

  • Rao, R. R. and Hajra, P. K., Floristic diversity of the eastern Himalaya – in a conservation perspective. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 1986, pp. 103–125.

  • Rao, R. R. and Hajra, P. K., Methods of research in ethnobotany. In A Manual of Ethnobotany (ed. Jain, S. K.), Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, 1987, pp. 33–41.

  • Ved, D. K., Kinhal, G. A., Haridasan, K., Ravikumar, K., Ghate, U., Vijaya Shankar, R. and Indresha, J. H., Conservation assessment and management prioritisation for the medicinal plants of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya and Sikkim. In Proceedings of the workshop, Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions, Bangalore, 2003.

  • Ravikumar, K. and Ved, D. K., 100 Red Listed Medicinal Plants of Conservation Concern in Southern India. Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions (FRLHT), Bangalore, 2000.

  • Shenoy, H. S., Rajasekharan, P. E., Souravi, K. and Anand, M., Extended distribution of Madhuca insignis (Radlk.) H.J. Lam. (Sapotaceae) – a critically endangered species in Shimoga District of Karnataka. Zoo’s Print J., 2015.

  • Ved, D. K. and Goraya, G. S., Demand and Supply of Medicinal Plants in India, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, 2008.

  • FRLHT, Conservation and Adaptive Management of Medicinal Plants – A participatory Model: Medicinal Plant Conservation Areas and Medicinal Plant Development Areas, Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions, Bangalore, 2006.

  • Dogra, P. D., Intraspecific variation, species diversity and gene conservation in Indian forest tree species. In Plant Science Researches in India (eds Trivedi, M. L., Gill, B. S. and Saini, S. S.), Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, 1989, pp. 265–278.

  • Bonham C. A., Dulloo, E., Mathur, P., Brahmi, P., Tyagi, R. K. and Upadhyaya, H., Plant genetic resources and germplasm use in India. Asian Biotechnol. Dev. Rev., 2010, 12(3), 17–34.

  • Uma Shaanker, R., Ganeshaiah, K. N. and Bawa, K. S. (eds), Forest Genetic Resources: Status, Threats and Conservation Strategies, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 2001, pp. 165–171.

  • Saxena, A., Haridasan, K. and Ahlawat, S. P., Conservation of forest genetic resources of Arunachal Pradesh and Eastern Himalayas. In Forest Genetic Resources: Status, Threats and Conservation Strategies (eds Uma Shaankar, R., Ganeshaiah, K. N. and Bawa, K. S.), Oxford & IBH Publishing Co Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 2001, pp. 237–251.

  • Singh, N. B. and Beniwal, B. S., Genetic improvement of economic species of bamboo in Arunachal Pradesh. Selection of plus bamboo and establishment of germplasm bank. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot., 1988, 12(1), 163–169.

  • www.thanal.co.in

  • www.navara.in

  • Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Government of India Press, New Delhi, 1968.

  • Renuka, C., How to establish a cane plantation. KFRI Information Bulletin No. 10, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, 1991.

  • Bebber, D. P. et al., Herbaria are a major frontier for species discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2010, 107, 22169–22171.


Abstract Views: 443

PDF Views: 123




  • Contributions of Plant Taxonomy, Herbarium and Field Germplasm Bank to Conservation of Threatened Plants:Case Studies from the Himalayas and Eastern and Western Ghats

Abstract Views: 443  |  PDF Views: 123

Authors

K. Haridasan
TDU, Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions, Bengaluru 560 106, India
A. A. Mao
Botanical Survey of India, Shillong 793 003, India
M. K. Janarthanam
Department of Botany, Goa University, Goa 403 206, India
A. K. Pandey
Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
S. K. Barik
CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute (NBRI), Lucknow 226 001, India
S. K. Srivastava
Botanical Survey of India, Dehradun 786 006, India
P. C. Panda
Regional Plant Resource Centre (RPRC), Bhubaneswar 751 105, India
Geetha Suresh
TDU, Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions, Bengaluru 560 106, India
S. K. Borthakur
Department of Botany, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781 014, India
B. K. Datta
Department of Botany, Tripura University, Agartala 799 022, India
B. Ravi Prasad Rao
Department of Botany, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur 515 003, India

Abstract


Conservation of biodiversity, a growing concern today, faces multiple challenges. Although ecosystem approach has been recommended as a solution, conservation of threatened species is difficult as they are spread across the ecosystems and are often restricted to microhabitats. In this article, the importance of taxonomy, herbarium and field germplasm bank in conservation of threatened species is discussed. It is concluded that individually each of these measures has important role to play in conservation. They also complement each other in reversing the threat perspective of the species.

Keywords


Biodiversity, Conservation, Germplasm Bank, Herbarium, Taxonomy.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi03%2F512-518