Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Research Output of Indian Institutions during 2011–2016:Quality and Quantity Perspective


Affiliations
1 Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, India
2 SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, India
 

The publication output from Indian institutions has been steadily increasing during the last few years. This may be attributed to the higher investment in research and also linking the number of publications with career advancement. There is a need to analyse the publication output of Indian institutions in terms of quality of publications. In this study, output in the top 10 percentile, as computed by SciVal (a product of Elsevier), has been used as an indicator of the quality of research output, since it reflects the percentage of an institution’s publication in the top 10 percentile of the most cited articles. Out of the 15 subject areas listed in SciVal, 7 contribute to more than 65% of publications from Indian institutions. Accordingly, Indian institutions with output in the top 10 percentile greater than the national average in these 7 major subject areas have been identified to compare their research output in terms of quality.

Keywords

Public and Private Institutions, Performance Assessment, Quality and Quantity Perspective, Research Output.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Singh, A., Are our all research journals scholarly and peer reviewed? Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(2), 161.

  • http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/fake-journals-make-in-india-gone-wrong/article7800231.ece (last viewed on 22August 2017).

  • Prathap, G., Excellence mapping of research performance in India during the 2009–2013 window. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(3), 437–438.

  • Garg, K. C., Dutt, B. and Kumar, S., Scientometric profile of Indian science as seen through Science Citation Index. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud., 2006, 53, 114–125.

  • Kumar, S., Garg, K. C. and Dutt, B., Indian scientific output as seen through Indian Science Abstracts. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud., 2009, 56, 163–168.

  • Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M., Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999–2008. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(3), 304–306.

  • Basu, A., Banshal, S., Singhal, K. and Singh, V., Designing a Composite Index for research performance evaluation at the national or regional level: ranking Central Universities in India. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3), 1171–1193.

  • https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/53327/scival-metrics-guidebook-v1_01-february2014.pdf (last viewed on 22 August 2017).

  • Garg, K. C. and Kumar, S., Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3), 1771–1783.

  • Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., Natarajan, M. and Ramesh Babu, B., Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: a scientometric analysis, 1990–2009. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(2), 501–522.

  • Kaur, H. and Mahajan, P., Ranking of medical institutes of India for quality and quantity: a case study. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(2), 1129–1139.

  • Singh, V., Uddin, A. and Pinto, D., Computer science research: the top 100 institutions in India and in the world. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(2), 529–553.

  • Prathap, G., A three-dimensional bibliometric evaluation of recent research in India. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(3), 1085–1097.


Abstract Views: 356

PDF Views: 108




  • Research Output of Indian Institutions during 2011–2016:Quality and Quantity Perspective

Abstract Views: 356  |  PDF Views: 108

Authors

K. S. Rajan
Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, India
S. Swaminathan
Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, India
S. Vaidhyasubramaniam
SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, India

Abstract


The publication output from Indian institutions has been steadily increasing during the last few years. This may be attributed to the higher investment in research and also linking the number of publications with career advancement. There is a need to analyse the publication output of Indian institutions in terms of quality of publications. In this study, output in the top 10 percentile, as computed by SciVal (a product of Elsevier), has been used as an indicator of the quality of research output, since it reflects the percentage of an institution’s publication in the top 10 percentile of the most cited articles. Out of the 15 subject areas listed in SciVal, 7 contribute to more than 65% of publications from Indian institutions. Accordingly, Indian institutions with output in the top 10 percentile greater than the national average in these 7 major subject areas have been identified to compare their research output in terms of quality.

Keywords


Public and Private Institutions, Performance Assessment, Quality and Quantity Perspective, Research Output.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi04%2F740-746