Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Decadal Change in Supraglacial Debris Cover in Baspa Basin, Western Himalaya


Affiliations
1 Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
 

Supraglacial debris cover (SDC) influences surface energy balance and glacier dynamics. However, very few studies have been carried out to understand its distribution and evolution. Previous glacier investigations carried out in Baspa basin, Western Himalaya, focus on retreat and mass balance. Therefore, the present study monitored change in SDC area from 1997 to 2014 using Landsat data. SDC area change was estimated within a ‘minimum snow-free glacier area’ using normalized difference snow index (NDSI) and band ratio of near infrared and shortwave infrared. Threshold values for NDSI and band ratio map were derived manually. The study was carried out for a ‘minimum snow-free glacier area’ of 60.5 ± 2.4 sq. km out of 174 ± 7 sq. km of total glaciated area. SDC area of 31.5 ± 1.4, 33.2 ± 1.2, 34.6 ± 1.9 and 36.3 ± 0.7 sq. km for 1997, 2000, 2011 and 2014 respectively, was estimated. Analyses show a linear increase in SDC area from 1997 to 2014 by 2.8 ± 0.4%. Naradu, a benchmark glacier in the basin, show one of the highest increase in SDC area (5.6 ± 0.4%). The findings from the present study are in line with other published results that suggest retreat, glacier fragmentation and mass loss, which could be due to climate change. The present study can be extended further using the SDC map and the results, in glacier hydrology and mass balance modelling to predict future loss.

Keywords

Climate Change, Glaciers, Remote Sensing, Supraglacial Debris Cover, Western Himalaya.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Shroder, J. F., Bishop, M. P., Copland, L. and Sloan, V. F., Debris‐covered glaciers and rock glaciers in the Nanga Parbat Himalaya, Pakistan. Geogr. Ann.: Series A, Phys. Geogr., 2000, 82(1), 17–31.

  • Bhambri, R., Bolch, T. and Chaujar, R. K., Mapping of debriscovered glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and thermal data. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2011, 32(23), 8095–8119.

  • Racoviteanu, A. and Williams, M. W., Decision tree and texture analysis for mapping debris-covered glaciers in the Kangchenjunga area, Eastern Himalaya. Remote Sensing, 2012, 4(10), 3078–3109.

  • Nagai, H., Fujita, K., Nuimura, T. and Sakai, A., Southwest-facing slopes control the formation of debris-covered glaciers in the Bhutan Himalaya. Cryosphere, 2013, 7(4), 1303–1314.

  • Anderson, L. S. and Anderson, R. S., Modeling debris-covered glaciers: response to steady debris deposition. Cryosphere, 2016, 10(3), 1105.

  • Bolch, T., Buchroithner, M. F., Kunert, A. and Kamp, U., Automated delineation of debris-covered glaciers based on ASTER data. In Geoinformation in Europe. Proceedings of the 27th EARSeL Symposium, Bolzano, Italy, 2007, pp. 4–6.

  • Scherler, D., Bookhagen, B. and Strecker, M. R., Spatially variable response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change affected by debris cover. Nature Geosci., 2011, 4(3), 156–159.

  • Basnett, S., Kulkarni, A. V. and Bolch, T., The influence of debris cover and glacial lakes on the recession of glaciers in Sikkim Himalaya, India. J. Glaciol., 2013, 59(218), 1035–1046.

  • Bhardwaj, A., Joshi, P. K., Sam, L., Singh, M. K., Singh, S. and Kumar, R., Applicability of Landsat 8 data for characterizing glacier facies and supraglacial debris. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinf., 2015, 38, 51–64.

  • Benn, D. I. et al., Response of debris-covered glaciers in the Mount Everest region to recent warming, and implications for outburst flood hazards. Earth-Sci. Rev., 2012, 114(1), 156–174.

  • Banerjee, A. and Shankar, R., On the response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change. J. Glaciol., 2013, 59(215), 480–490.

  • Pellicciotti, F., Stephan, C., Miles, E., Herreid, S., Immerzeel, W. W. and Bolch, T., Mass-balance changes of the debris-covered glaciers in the Langtang Himal, Nepal, from 1974 to 1999. J. Glaciol., 2015, 61(226), 373–386.

  • Vincent, C. et al., Reduced melt on debris-covered glaciers: investigations from Changri Nup Glacier, Nepal. Cryosphere, 2016, 10(4), 1845.

  • Singh, P., Kumar, N., Ramasastri, K. S. and Singh, Y., DebrisCovered Glaciers (Proceedings of a workshop held at Seattle, Washington, USA, September 2000), IAHS Publ. No. 264, 2000.

  • Sakai, A., Takeuchi, N., Fujita, K. and Nakawo, M., Role of Supraglacial Ponds in the Ablation Process of a Debris-covered Glacier in the Nepal Himalayas, IAHS Publication, 2000, pp. 119–132.

  • Nicholson, L. and Benn, D. I., Calculating ice melt beneath a debris layer using meteorological data. J. Glaciol., 2006, 52(178), 463–470.

  • Zhang, Y., Fujita, K., Liu, S., Liu, Q. and Nuimura, T., Distribution of debris thickness and its effect on ice melt at Hailuogou glacier, southeastern Tibetan Plateau, using in situ surveys and ASTER imagery. J. Glaciol., 2011, 57(206), 1147–1157.

  • Pratap, B., Dobhal, D. P., Mehta, M. and Bhambri, R., Influence of debris cover and altitude on glacier surface melting: a case study on Dokriani Glacier, central Himalaya, India. Ann. Glaciol., 2015, 56(70), 9–16.

  • Ali, I., Shukla, A. and Romshoo, S. A., Assessing linkages between spatial facies changes and dimensional variations of glaciers in the upper Indus Basin, western Himalaya. Geomorphology, 2017, 284, 115–129.

  • Thompson, S., Benn, D. I., Mertes, J. and Luckman, A., Stagnation and mass loss on a Himalayan debris-covered glacier: processes, patterns and rates. J. Glaciol., 2016, 62(233), 467–485.

  • Kulkarni, A. V., Bahuguna, I. M., Rathore, B. P., Singh, S. K., Randhawa, S. S., Sood, R. K. and Dhar, S., Glacial retreat in Himalaya using Indian Remote Sensing satellite data. Curr. Sci., 2007, 92(1), 69–74.

  • Dobhal, D. P., Mehta, M. and Srivastava, D., Influence of debris cover on terminus retreat and mass changes of Chorabari Glacier, Garhwal region, central Himalaya, India. J. Glaciol., 2013, 59(217), 961–971.

  • Reynolds, J. M., On the Formation of Supraglacial Lakes on Debris-covered Glaciers. In Proceedings of a Workshop held at Seattle, Washington, USA, September 2000, IAHS Publication No. 264, 2000, pp. 153–164.

  • Kaab, A., Berthier, E., Nuth, C., Gardelle, J. and Arnaud, Y., Contrasting patterns of early twenty-first-century glacier mass change in the Himalayas. Nature, 2012, 488(7412), 495–498.

  • Paul, F., Huggel, C. and Kääb, A., Combining satellite multispectral image data and a digital elevation model for mapping debriscovered glaciers. Remote Sensing Environ., 2004, 89(4), 510–518.

  • Ranzi, R., Grossi, G., Iacovelli, L. and Taschner, S., Use of multispectral ASTER images for mapping debris-covered glaciers within the GLIMS project. In Proceedings of the IEEE International, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Anchorage, AK, USA, IGARSS’04, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1144–1147.

  • Shukla, A., Gupta, R. and Arora, M. K., Delineation of debriscovered glacier boundaries using optical and thermal remote sensing data. Remote Sensing Lett., 2010, 1(1), 11–17.

  • Khan, A., Naz, B. S. and Bowling, L. C., Separating snow, clean and debris-covered ice in the Upper Indus Basin, Hindukush–Karakoram–Himalayas, using Landsat images between 1998 and 2002. J. Hydrol., 2015, 521, 46–64.

  • Herreid, S., Pellicciotti, F., Ayala, A., Chesnokova, A., Kienholz, C., Shea, J. and Shrestha, A., Satellite observations show no net change in the percentage of supraglacial debris-covered area in northern Pakistan from 1977 to 2014. J. Glaciol., 2015, 61(227), 524–536.

  • Shukla, A., Gupta, R. P. and Arora, M. K., Estimation of debris cover and its temporal variation using optical satellite sensor data: a case study in Chenab basin, Himalaya. J. Glaciol., 2009, 55(191), 444–452.

  • Karimi, N., Farokhnia, A., Karimi, L., Eftekhari, M. and Ghalkhani, H., Combining optical and thermal remote sensing data for mapping debris-covered glaciers (Alamkouh Glaciers, Iran). Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 2012, 71, 73–83.

  • Racoviteanu, A., Arnaud, Y., Williams, M. W. and Manley, W. F., Spatial patterns in glacier characteristics and area changes from 1962 to 2006 in the Kanchenjunga–Sikkim area, eastern Himalaya. Cryosphere, 2014, 9, 505–523.

  • Pfeffer, W. T. et al., The Randolph glacier inventory: a globally complete inventory of glaciers. J. Glaciol., 2014, 60(221), 537–552.

  • Svoboda, F. and Paul, F., A new glacier inventory on southern Baffin Island, Canada, from ASTER data: I. Applied methods, challenges and solutions. Ann. Glaciol., 2009, 50(53), 11–21.

  • Hall, D. K., Ormsby, J. P., Bindschadler, R. A. and Siddalingaiah, H., Characterization of snow and ice reflectance zones on glaciers using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Ann. Glaciol., 1987, 9(1), 104–108.

  • Kulkarni, A. V. and Alex, S., Estimation of recent glacial variations in Baspa Basin using remote sensing technique. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2003, 31(2), 81–90.

  • Chander, G., Markham, B. L. and Helder, D. L., Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing Environ., 2009, 113(5), 893–903.

  • Congalton, R. G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ., 1991, 37(1), 35–46.

  • Dozier, J., Spectral signature of alpine snow cover from the Landsat Thematic Mapper. Remote Sensing Environ., 1989, 28, 9–22.

  • Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A. and Salomonson, V. V., Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sensing Environ., 1995, 54(2), 127–140.

  • Kulkarni, A. V., Srinivasulu, J. and Manjul, S. S., Field based spectral reflectance studies to develop NDSI method for snow cover monitoring. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2002, 30(1), 73–80.

  • Paul, F., Kaab, A., Maisch, M., Kellenberger, T. and Haeberli, W., The new remote-sensing-derived Swiss glacier inventory: I. methods. Ann. Glaciol., 2002, 34(1), 355–361.

  • Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., Chaujar, R. K. and Kulshreshtha, S. C., Glacier changes in the Garhwal Himalaya, India, from 1968 to 2006 based on remote sensing. J. Glaciol., 2011, 57(203), 543–556.

  • Bolch, T., Menounos, B. and Wheate, R., Landsat-based inventory of glaciers in western Canada, 1985–2005. Remote Sensing Environ., 2010, 114(1), 127–137.

  • Kumar, G. V., Kulkarni, A. V., Gupta, A. K. and Sharma, P., Mass balance estimation using geodetic method for glaciers in Baspa basin, Western Himalaya. Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(3), 486–492.

  • Kulkarni, A. V., Rathore, B. P. and Alex, S., Monitoring of glacial mass balance in the Baspa basin using accumulation area ratio method. Curr. Sci., 2004, 86(1), 185–190.


Abstract Views: 396

PDF Views: 141




  • Decadal Change in Supraglacial Debris Cover in Baspa Basin, Western Himalaya

Abstract Views: 396  |  PDF Views: 141

Authors

S. Pratibha
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Anil V. Kulkarni
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India

Abstract


Supraglacial debris cover (SDC) influences surface energy balance and glacier dynamics. However, very few studies have been carried out to understand its distribution and evolution. Previous glacier investigations carried out in Baspa basin, Western Himalaya, focus on retreat and mass balance. Therefore, the present study monitored change in SDC area from 1997 to 2014 using Landsat data. SDC area change was estimated within a ‘minimum snow-free glacier area’ using normalized difference snow index (NDSI) and band ratio of near infrared and shortwave infrared. Threshold values for NDSI and band ratio map were derived manually. The study was carried out for a ‘minimum snow-free glacier area’ of 60.5 ± 2.4 sq. km out of 174 ± 7 sq. km of total glaciated area. SDC area of 31.5 ± 1.4, 33.2 ± 1.2, 34.6 ± 1.9 and 36.3 ± 0.7 sq. km for 1997, 2000, 2011 and 2014 respectively, was estimated. Analyses show a linear increase in SDC area from 1997 to 2014 by 2.8 ± 0.4%. Naradu, a benchmark glacier in the basin, show one of the highest increase in SDC area (5.6 ± 0.4%). The findings from the present study are in line with other published results that suggest retreat, glacier fragmentation and mass loss, which could be due to climate change. The present study can be extended further using the SDC map and the results, in glacier hydrology and mass balance modelling to predict future loss.

Keywords


Climate Change, Glaciers, Remote Sensing, Supraglacial Debris Cover, Western Himalaya.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi04%2F792-799