Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Selecting Clinical and Laboratory Methods of Manufacture of Orthopaedic Titanium Alloy Structures Using a Biopotentiometer


Affiliations
1 Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
 

The present communication aims at determining an optimum method of manufacture of orthopaedic arch titanium alloy dentures that would not cause galvanosis in patients using such dentures. A clinical randomized controlled retrospective study was conducted. Sixty patients who used arch titanium alloy dentures were examined. Three measurements of electrochemical potentials in various areas of the oral cavity were done in all patients, using a biopotentiometer. Linear prediction of differences in potentials in measurement areas 1–3 for the control group (CG) of patients exhibited minor growth dynamics, which can be indicative of the risk of galvanosis in CG patients in the future.

Keywords

Biopotentiometry, Dentistry, Dentures, Galvanosis, Galvanic Currents, Titanium Alloys.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Al-Sowygh, Z. H., The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2014, 112(2), 176–81; doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.023.

  • Dhingra, K., Oral rehabilitation considerations for partially edentulous periodontal patients. J. Prosthodont., 2012, 21(6), 494–513; doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x.

  • Zhang, X., Wei, L. C., Wu, B., Yu, L. Y., Wang, X. P. and Liu, Y., A comparative analysis of metal allergens associated with dental alloy prostheses and the expression of HLA-DR in gingival tissue. Mol. Med. Rep., 2016, 13, 91–98; doi:10.3892/mmr.2015.4562.

  • Imirzalioglu, P., Alaaddinoglu, E., Yilmaz, Z., Oduncuoglu, B., Yilmaz, B. and Rosenstiel, S., Influence of recasting different types of dental alloys on gingival fibroblast cytotoxicity. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2012, 107, 24–33; doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60013-4.

  • Joska, L., Venclikova, Z., Poddana, M. and Benada, O., The mechanism of gingiva metallic pigmentations formation. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2009, 13, 1–7; doi:10.1007/s00784-008-0206-8.

  • Javed, F., Al-Hezaimi, K., Almas, K. and Romanos, G. E., Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? a systematic review. Clin. Implant Dentistry Related Res., 2013, 15(1), 47–52; doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00330.x.

  • Agustin-Panadero, R., Roman-Rodriguez, J. L., Ferreiroa, A., Sola-Ruiz, M. F. and Fons-Font, A., Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literature review. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2014, 1, 6(1), 66–73; doi:10.4317/jced.51304. eCollection 2014.

  • Heintze, S. D. and Rousson, V., Survival of zirconia and metal supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2010, 23, 493–502.

  • Anusavice, K. J., Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent. Mater., 2011, 28, 102–111; doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.012.

  • Rinke, S., SchAfer, S., Lange, K., Gersdoff, N. and Roediger, M., Practice-based clinical evaluation of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 3 year results. J. Oral. Rehabil., 2013, 40, 228–237; doi:10.1111/joor.12018.

  • Agustin-Panadero, R., Fons-Font, A., Roman-Rodriguez, J. L., Granell-Ruiz, M., del Rio-Highsmith, J. and Sola-Ruiz, M. F., Zirconia versus metal: a preliminary comparative analysis of ceramic veneer behavior. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2012, 25, 294–300.

  • Saito, A., Komine, F., Blatz, M. and Matsumura, H., A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2010, 104, 247–257; doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60133-3.

  • Madfa, A. A. and Yue, X. G., Dental prostheses mimic the natural enamel behavior under functional loading: a review article. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev., 2016, 52(1), 2–13; doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2015.07.001.

  • Lazarov, A., Kidron, D., Tulchinsky, Z. and Minkow, B., Contact orofacial granulomatosis caused by delayed hypersensitivity to gold and mercury. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2003, 49, 1117–1120.

  • Ahlgren, C., Ahnlide, I., Bjorkner, B., Bruze, M., Liedholm, R., Moller, H. and Nilner, K., Contact allergy to gold is correlated to dental gold. Acta Derm. Venereol., 2002, 82, 41–44.

  • Bhatavadekar, N. B., Squamous cell carcinoma in association with dental implants: an assessment of previously hypothesized carcinogenic mechanisms and a case report. J. Oral Implantol., 2012, 38(6), 792–798; doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00045.

  • Karl, M., Outcome of bonded vs all-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed prostheses for single tooth replacement. Eur. J. Oral. Implantol., 2016, 9(Suppl 1), 25–44.

  • Chaturvedi, T. P., An overview of the corrosion aspect of dental implants (titanium and its alloys). Indian J. Dent. Res., 2009, 20(1), 91–98.

  • Utyuzh, A. S., Yumashev, A. V. and Mikhailova, M. V., Spectrographic analysis of titanium alloys in prosthetic dentistry. J. Global Pharma Technol., 2016, 8(12), 7–11.

  • Agarwal, A., Tyagi, A., Ahuja, A., Kumar, N., De, N. and Bhutani, H., Corrosion aspect of dental implants – an overview and literature review. Open J. Stomatol., 2014, 4, 56–60; doi:10.4236/ojst.2014.42010.

  • Thomas, P., Iglhaut, G., Wollenberg, A., Cadosch, D. and Summer, B., Allergy or tolerance: reduced inflammatory cytokine response and concomitant IL-10 production of lymphocytes and monocytes in symptom-free titanium dental implant patients. BioMed. Res. Int., 2013; Article ID 539834, p. 9; doi:10.1155/2013/539834.

  • Danilina, T. F., Naumova, V. N. and Zhidovinov, A. V., Casting in Orthopedic Dentistry, Monograph, Volggtu, Volgograd, 2011.

  • Hemerling-Powidzka, M., Koczorowski, R. and Breliñska, R., Response of oral mucosa to contact with class 4 titanium (Reakcja błony śluzowej jamy ustnej na kontakt z tytanem klasyIV). J. Elementol., 2013, 18(2), 227–237; doi:10.5601/jelem.2013.18.2.03.

  • Barao, V. A., Yoon, C. J., Mathew, M. T., Yuan, J. C., Wu, C. D. and Sukotjo, C., Attachment of Porphyromonas gingivalis to corroded commercially pure titanium and titanium–aluminum–vanadium alloy. J. Periodontol., 2014, 85(9), 1275–1282; doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130595.

  • Manivasagam, G., Dhinasekaran, D. and Rajamanickam, A., Bio-medical implants: corrosion and its prevention – a review. Recent Patents Corrosion Sci., 2010, 2, 40–54; doi: 10.2174/1877610801002010040.

  • Richard, C., Kowandy, C., Landoulsi, J., Geetha, M. and Ramasawmy, H., Corrosion and wear behavior of thermally sprayed nano ceramic coatings on commercially pure Titanium and Ti-13Nb-13Zr. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater., 2010, 28, 115–123; doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2009.08.006.

  • Rigal, R., Galvanism, corrosion and electrolytic polishing in dental art (Article in French). Inf. Dent., 1955, 37(25), 1078–1089.

  • Laudenbach, P. and Recoing, J., Is intraoral galvanism pathogenic? (Article in French). Rev. Stomatol, Chir, Maxillofac., 1969, 70(7), 481–499.

  • Maruthamuthu, S., Rajasekar, A., Sathiyanarayanan, S., Muthukumar, N. and Palaniswamy, N., Electrochemical behaviour of microbes on orthodontic wires. Curr. Sci., 2005, 89, 988–1005.

  • Joska, L., Venclikova, Z., Poddana, M. and Benada, O., The mechanism of gingiva metallic pigmentations formation. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2009, 13(1), 1–7; doi:10.1007/s00784-008-0206-8.

  • House, K., Sernetz, F., Dymock, D., Sandy, J. R. and Ireland, A. J., Corrosion of orthodontic appliances – should we care? Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop., 2008, 133(4), 584–592; doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.021.

  • Alnazzawi, A. A., Oral diseases associated with fixed prosthodontic restorations. Saudi Med. J., 2017, 38(3), 322–324; doi:10.15537/smj.2017.3.18645.

  • Podzimek, S., Tomka, M., Sommerova, P., Lyuya-Mi, Y., Bartova, J. and Prochazkova, J., Immune markers in oral discomfort patients before and after elimination of oral galvanism. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett., 2013, 34(8), 802–808.

  • Prochazkova, J. et al., Metal alloys in the oral cavity as a cause of oral discomfort in sensitive patients. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett., 2006, 27(1), 53–8.

  • Velichko, L. S. and Yashchikovskii, N. V., Intolerance of Metal Prostheses of the Electrogalvanic Nature. A Study Guide, BGMU, Minsk, 2010.

  • Sotnikova, M. V., Antonov, A. R. and Karsanov, V. T., The effect of complete removable dentures made on immunometabolic parameters of the oral fluid in geriatric patients. A Collection of Articles to Commemorate the 70th Anniversary of the Novosibirsk State Medical Academy, Novosibirsk, 2005.

  • Kenney, E. B. and Ash, M. M., Oxidation-reduction potential of developing plaque, periodontal pockets and gingival sulci. J. Periodontol., 1969, 40, 630–633; doi:10.1902/jop.1969.40.11.630.

  • Kuserova, H. et al., Influence of galvanic phenomena on occurrence of allergic symptoms in the mouth. Gen. Dent., 2002, 50(1), 62–65.

  • Muller, A. W. J., Van Loon, L. A. J. and Davidson, C. L., Electrical potentials or restorations in subjects without oral complaints. J. Oral. Rehabil., 1990, 17, 419–424; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01413.x.

  • Sobroe, J. et al., Toll-like receptors in health and disease complex question remain. J. Immunol., 2003, 15(171), 1630–1639.

  • Bergman, M., Ginstrup, O. and Nilsson, B., Potentials of and currents between dental metallic restorations. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 1982, 90(5), 404–408; doi:10.1111/J.1600-0722.1982.TB00754.X.

  • Parunov, V. A., Yurkovets, P. V. and Lebedenko, I. Y., Technological features of metal-ceramic prosthesis frameworks manufactured from domestic alloys of precious and base metals (Article in Russian). Stomatologiia, 2016, 95(4), 71–75.


Abstract Views: 291

PDF Views: 98




  • Selecting Clinical and Laboratory Methods of Manufacture of Orthopaedic Titanium Alloy Structures Using a Biopotentiometer

Abstract Views: 291  |  PDF Views: 98

Authors

Alexei V. Yumashev
Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Anatolij S. Utyuzh
Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Maria V. Mikhailova
Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Vadim O. Samusenkov
Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Ilona R. Volchkova
Department of Orthopedic Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation

Abstract


The present communication aims at determining an optimum method of manufacture of orthopaedic arch titanium alloy dentures that would not cause galvanosis in patients using such dentures. A clinical randomized controlled retrospective study was conducted. Sixty patients who used arch titanium alloy dentures were examined. Three measurements of electrochemical potentials in various areas of the oral cavity were done in all patients, using a biopotentiometer. Linear prediction of differences in potentials in measurement areas 1–3 for the control group (CG) of patients exhibited minor growth dynamics, which can be indicative of the risk of galvanosis in CG patients in the future.

Keywords


Biopotentiometry, Dentistry, Dentures, Galvanosis, Galvanic Currents, Titanium Alloys.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi04%2F891-896