Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Identification of Unique Characteristics of Deception from Facial Expression


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, and University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India
 

Facial asymmetry provides important information for detecting deception. The present study aims at deciphering deception in facial expression unique to Indian culture and to detect differences between parameters of expression of ‘felt’ emotion and ‘deceived’ expression. Facial expressions are analysed based on Facial Action Coding System. Results reveal that participants deamplify happiness whereas they neutralize and mask negative emotions.

Keywords

Deception, Facial Asymmetry, Facial Expression.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Rosenberg, E., Introduction: The study of spontaneous facial expressions in psychology. In What the Face Reveals: Basic and Applied Studies of Spontaneous Expressions using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) (eds Ekman, P. and Rosenberg, E.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1997, pp. 3–18.

  • Ekman, P., Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage, Norton, New York, 1992.

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V. and Hager, J. C., The Facial Action Coding System, Research Nexus eBook, Salt Lake City, UT, 2002.

  • Hjortsjo, C. H., Man’s face and mimic language. 1969, Cited in V. Bruce and A. Young, In the eye of the beholder: The science of face perception, Oxford, NY, 1998.

  • Oster, H., Hegley, D. and Nagel, L., Adult judgments and finegrained analysis of infant facial expressions: Testing the validity of a priori coding formulas. Dev. Psychol., 1992, 28, 1115–1131.

  • Ekman, P. and Rosenberg, E. L. (eds), What the Face Reveals: Basic and Applied Studies of Spontaneous Expression using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), Oxford, New York, 1997.

  • Sayette, M. A., Cohn, J. F., Wertz, J. M., Perrott, M. A. and Parrott, D. J., A psychometric evaluation of the facial action coding system for assessing spontaneous expression. J. Nonverbal Behav., 2001, 25, 167–186.

  • Cohen, J., A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 1960, 20, 37–46.

  • Fleiss, J. L., Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, Wiley, New York, 1981.

  • Cohn, J. F., Ambadar, Z. and Ekman, P., Observer-based measurement of facial expression with the Facial Action Coding System. In The Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (eds Coan, J. A. and Allen, J. J. B.), Oxford University Press Series in Affective Science, New York, 2007, pp. 203–221.

  • Rinn, W. E., The neuropsychology of facial expression: a review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions. Psychol. Bull., 1984, 95, 52–77.

  • Mitsukawa, N., Moriyama, H., Shiozawa, K. and Satoh, K., Study on distribution of terminal branches of the facial nerve in mimetic muscles (orbicularis oculi muscle and orbicularis oris muscle). Ann. PlastSurg, 2014, 72(1), 71–74.

  • Crosby, E. C. and Dejonge, B. R., Experimental and clinical studies of the central connections and central relation of the facial nerve. Ann. Otol., 1963, 72, 735–755.

  • Nelson, J. R., Facial paralysis of central nervous system origin. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 1974, 7, 411–424.

  • Hayes, J. G. and Metts, S., Managing the expression of emotion. Western J. Commun., 2008, 72, 374–396.

  • Darwin, C., The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, Oxford University Press, New York; de Waal, F. B. M., 2003; Darwin’s Legacy and the Study of Primate Visual Communication. In Emotions Inside Out: 130 years after Darwin’s the Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals (eds Ekman, P. et al.), Academy of Sciences, New York, 1872, pp. 7–31.

  • Buck, R., The Communication of Emotion, Guilford Press, New York, 1984.

  • Ekman, P., Hager, J. C. and Friesen, W. V., The symmetry of emotional and deliberate facial actions. Psychophysiology, 1981, 18, 101–106.

  • Borod, J. C., Zgaljardic, D., Tabert, M. H. and Koff, E., Asymmetries of emotional perception and expression in normal adults. In Handbook of Neuropsychology (ed. Gainotti, G.), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2nd edn, vol. 5, pp. 181–205.

  • Asthana, H. S. and Mandal, M. K., Hemifacial asymmetry in emotion expression. Behav. Modif. (special issue: facial expression of emotions), 1998, 22, 177–183.

  • Braun, C. M., Baribeau, J. M., Ethier, M., Guerette, R. and Proulx, R., Emotional facial expressive and discriminative performance and lateralization in normal young adults. Cortex, 1987, 24, 77–90.

  • FaceGenModeller (version 3.4) [Computer software]. Singular Inversions Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.


Abstract Views: 187

PDF Views: 83




  • Identification of Unique Characteristics of Deception from Facial Expression

Abstract Views: 187  |  PDF Views: 83

Authors

Ananya Mondal
Department of Psychology, and University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India
Pritha Mukhopadhyay
Department of Psychology, and University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India
Nabanita Basu
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India
Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India
Tanima Chatterjee
Department of Psychology, and University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India

Abstract


Facial asymmetry provides important information for detecting deception. The present study aims at deciphering deception in facial expression unique to Indian culture and to detect differences between parameters of expression of ‘felt’ emotion and ‘deceived’ expression. Facial expressions are analysed based on Facial Action Coding System. Results reveal that participants deamplify happiness whereas they neutralize and mask negative emotions.

Keywords


Deception, Facial Asymmetry, Facial Expression.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi04%2F901-906