Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Collaboration Patterns of Indian Scientists in Organic Chemistry


Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
 

An analysis of 17,344 papers published by Indian scientists and indexed by Web of Science in the discipline of organic chemistry during 2004–2013 indicates that collaborative coefficient has increased during the later years (2011–2013). Of the total published papers, 6312 (36.4%) were due to domestic and international collaboration. The share of papers in domestic collaboration was 77.3% (4882) and international collaboration was 22.7% (1430). Among the international collaborating countries, India had published highest number of papers with the USA followed by Germany. Academic institutions followed by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) contributed the highest number of papers in domestic as well as in international collaboration. However, the value of domestic collaborative index and international collaborative index was less than 100 for both the sectors. The labs funded by CSIR also topped the list of institutions having domestic and international collaborative papers. The compound annual growth rate in domestic and international collaborative papers was 4.7 and 5.3 respectively. The value of domestic collaborative index was highest for CSIR-CDRI, Lucknow and international collaborative index for Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai.

Keywords

Academic Institutions, Collaboration Pattern, Collaborative Index, Organic Chemistry.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 1998. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA, 1998, pp. 5–43, 5–44, A-310 and Appendix Table 5-52.

  • Ecosystem Management Initiative, Collaboration, Michigan, 2002; www.snre.umich.edu/ecomgt/collaboration/definitions.htm (accessed on 16 April 2017).

  • Katz, J. S. and Martin, B. R., What is research collaboration? Res. Policy, 1997, 26(1), 1–18.

  • Glanzel, W., Schubert, A. and Czerwon, H. J., A bibliometrtic analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 1999, 45(2), 185–202.

  • Basu, A. and Vinu Kumar, B. S., International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics, 2000, 48(3), 381–402.

  • Prakasan, E. R. et al., Scientometric facts on the international collaborative Indian publications, Curr. Sci., 2014, 106(2), 166–169.

  • Gupta, B. M., Munshi, U. M. and Mishra, P. K., S&T collaboration of India with other South Asian countries. Curr. Sci., 2002, 83(10), 1201–1209.

  • Gupta, B. M. and Karisiddappa, C. R., Collaboration in theoretical population genetics speciality. Scientometrics, 1998, 42(3), 349–376.

  • Garg, K. C. and Padhi, P., A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(2), 415–427.

  • Dutt, B. and Nikam, K., Scientometrics of collaboration pattern in solar cell research in India. Ann. Lib. Infor. Stud., 2014, 61(1), 65–73.

  • Bibliometric study of India’s scientific publication outputs during 2001–10: evidence for changing trends, Department of Science and Technology, DST, New Delhi, July 2012; http://www.nstmisdst.org/PDF/Evidencesofchangingtrends.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2017).

  • He, T., International scientific collaboration of China with G7 countries. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(3), 571–582.

  • Ma, N. and Guan, J., An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publication in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 2005, 65(3), 343–355.

  • Kim, M.-J., Korean international co-authorship in science 1994–1996. J. Inf. Sci., 1999, 25(5) 403–412.

  • Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M. and Leydesdorff, L., Has globalization Strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the 18 Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 2012, 90(1), 163–175; doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0512.

  • Garg, K. C. and Dwivedi, S., Pattern of collaboration in the discipline of Japanese encephalitis, DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2014, 34(3), 241–247.

  • Owusu-Nimo, F. and Boshoff, N., Research collaboration in Ghana: patterns, motives and roles, Scientometrics, 2017, 110(3), 1099–1121; doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2221-x.

  • Dwivedi, S., Kumar and Garg, K. C., Scientometric profile of organic chemistry research in India during 2004–2013, Curr. Sci., 2015, 109(5), 869–877.

  • Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q. and Tague, J., Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 1988, 14(5–6), 421–433.

  • De Solla Price, D. and Beaver, D. B., Collaboration in an invisible college. Am. Psychol., 1966, 21(11), 1011–1018.


Abstract Views: 384

PDF Views: 129




  • Collaboration Patterns of Indian Scientists in Organic Chemistry

Abstract Views: 384  |  PDF Views: 129

Authors

K. C. Garg
CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
S. Kumar
CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
Bebi
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India

Abstract


An analysis of 17,344 papers published by Indian scientists and indexed by Web of Science in the discipline of organic chemistry during 2004–2013 indicates that collaborative coefficient has increased during the later years (2011–2013). Of the total published papers, 6312 (36.4%) were due to domestic and international collaboration. The share of papers in domestic collaboration was 77.3% (4882) and international collaboration was 22.7% (1430). Among the international collaborating countries, India had published highest number of papers with the USA followed by Germany. Academic institutions followed by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) contributed the highest number of papers in domestic as well as in international collaboration. However, the value of domestic collaborative index and international collaborative index was less than 100 for both the sectors. The labs funded by CSIR also topped the list of institutions having domestic and international collaborative papers. The compound annual growth rate in domestic and international collaborative papers was 4.7 and 5.3 respectively. The value of domestic collaborative index was highest for CSIR-CDRI, Lucknow and international collaborative index for Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai.

Keywords


Academic Institutions, Collaboration Pattern, Collaborative Index, Organic Chemistry.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi06%2F1174-1180