Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Citation Characteristics of Non-Citable Documents and Contributions to Journal Impact Factor


Affiliations
1 Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Management Institute, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan Province, China
2 Management Institute, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan Province, China
 

Journal impact factor (JIF) is defined as the number of citations within a given year to items published by a journal in the preceding two years, divided by the number of citable items published by the journal during those two years. However, the ‘citable documents’ include only articles and reviews, and the ‘non-citable documents’ (NCDs) actually can be and are often cited, and some may have higher citations. Here we explore the cited characteristics of NCDs and their contributions to JIF. All data were taken from the Web of Science database. The results showed that 315,017 NCDs (including editorials, letters, reprints, news items, corrections, biographical items, and book reviews) could be retrieved from 2012 to 2013. There were 160,580 editorials and 81,652 letters with the respective citations of 98,434 and 40,692 in 2014; the citations per item were 0.613 and 0.498 respectively. The contributions of these two types of NCDs to JIF are obvious. Of the 64 journals with NCDs ≥ 500 or NCDs ≥ 10 while the citations ≥ 20, 19 showed contributions of NCDs to more than 20%. Although some journals publish more NCDs, their contributions to JIF are not obvious; only for a few journals are the NCDs contributions to JIF higher. These are mainly medical journals.

Keywords

Citation Characteristics, Impact Factor, Journals, Non-Citable Documents.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Garfield, E., Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 1955, 122(3159), 103–111.

  • Liu, X. L., Wang, M. Y., Zhang, L., Wang, P. and Zhou, Z. X., Journal impact factor: is it only used in China and South Asia? Curr. Sci., 2013, 105(11), 1480–1484.

  • Gunasekaran, S., and Arunachalam, S., The impact factors of open access and subscription journals across fields. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(3), 380–388.

  • Finardi, U., Correlation between journal impact factor and citation performance: an experimental study. J. Informetr., 2013, 7(2), 357–370.

  • Wolfgang, G. and Moed, H. F., Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 2002, 53(2), 171–193.

  • Garfield, E., The agony and the ecstasy – the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. Chicago, USA, 2005.

  • Cronin, B., The citation process. Taylor Graham, London, UK, 1984.

  • Garfield, E., Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1979, 1(4), 359–375.

  • Gilbert, G. N., Measuring the growth of science: a review of indicators of scientific growth. Scientometrics, 1978, 1(1), 9–34.

  • Macroberts, M. H., and Macroberts, B. R., Problems of citation analysis. A critical review. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., 1989, 40(5), 342–349.

  • Dong, P., Loh, M. and Mondry, A., The impact factor revisited. Biomed. Digit Libr., 2005, 2, 7.

  • Curtis, W. and Hunter, J., What the impact factor means for surgery journals. World J. Surg., 2006, 30(8), 1368–1370.

  • Dellavalle, R., Schilling, L., Rodriguez, M., Van De Sompel, H. and Bollen, J., Refining dermatology journal impact factors using page rank. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2007, 57(1), 116–119.

  • Yang, Z. G. and Zhang, C. T., A proposal for a novel impact factor as an alternative to the JCR impact factor. Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 3410.

  • Zhang, C. T., A novel triangle mapping technique to study the h-index based citation distribution. Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 1023.

  • Campanario, J. M., The effect of citations on the significance of decimal places in the computation of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 2014, 99(2), 289–298.

  • Liu, X. L., The forecast method of journal impact factor indexed in SCI based on Web of Science database. Sci. Technol. Publ., 2014, 33(2), 87–91.

  • Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, T. H. N. and Reedijk, J., A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of angewandte chemie and the journal of the American chemical society inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only. Scientometrics, 1996, 37(1), 105–116.

  • Bensman, S. J., Garfield and the impact factor. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 1997, 41, 93–155.

  • Garfield, E., Citation analysis as a tool for journal evaluation. Science, 1972, 178(4060), 471–479.

  • Citrome, L., How we rate: is impact factor the most important measure? Int. J. Clin. Pract., 2013, 67(9), 819–820.

  • Zupanc, G. K. H., Impact beyond the impact factor. J. Comp. Physiol., 2014, 200(2), 113–116.

  • Bruix, J. and Sherman, M., Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology, 2011, 53(3), 1020–1022.

  • Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G. and Nielsen, H., SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nature Methods, 2011, 8(10), 785–786.

  • Wu, Y. S., The definition of journal impact factor should be adjusted. (EB/OL); http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1557-806325.html

  • Heneberg, P., Parallel worlds of citable documents and others: inflated commissioned opinion articles enhance scientometric indicators. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014, 65(3), 635–643.

  • Gai, S.S., Liu, X. L. and Zhang, S. L., The impact factor forecast and the structure analysis method of journals in the source SCI: an example of Nature. Chin. J. Sci. Technol. Period, 2014, 25(8), 980–984.

  • Liu, X. L., Structural characteristics of impact factors of the ten top international journals. Acta Editol., 2014, 26(3), 296–300.

  • Moed, H. F., and Vanleeuwen, T. N., Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific informations journal impact factors. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1995, 46(6), 461–467.

  • Jones, A. W., Mode of classification of source material as citable items skews journal impact factor calculations. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest., 2005, 65(7), 623–625.

  • Campanario, J. M. and Gonzalez, L., Journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor: documents labeled ‘editorial material’ in journals covered by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(2), 365–386.


Abstract Views: 703

PDF Views: 128




  • Citation Characteristics of Non-Citable Documents and Contributions to Journal Impact Factor

Abstract Views: 703  |  PDF Views: 128

Authors

Xue-Li Liu
Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Management Institute, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan Province, China
Ya-Hui Wei
Management Institute, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan Province, China
Shuang-Shuang Gai
Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Management Institute, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan Province, China

Abstract


Journal impact factor (JIF) is defined as the number of citations within a given year to items published by a journal in the preceding two years, divided by the number of citable items published by the journal during those two years. However, the ‘citable documents’ include only articles and reviews, and the ‘non-citable documents’ (NCDs) actually can be and are often cited, and some may have higher citations. Here we explore the cited characteristics of NCDs and their contributions to JIF. All data were taken from the Web of Science database. The results showed that 315,017 NCDs (including editorials, letters, reprints, news items, corrections, biographical items, and book reviews) could be retrieved from 2012 to 2013. There were 160,580 editorials and 81,652 letters with the respective citations of 98,434 and 40,692 in 2014; the citations per item were 0.613 and 0.498 respectively. The contributions of these two types of NCDs to JIF are obvious. Of the 64 journals with NCDs ≥ 500 or NCDs ≥ 10 while the citations ≥ 20, 19 showed contributions of NCDs to more than 20%. Although some journals publish more NCDs, their contributions to JIF are not obvious; only for a few journals are the NCDs contributions to JIF higher. These are mainly medical journals.

Keywords


Citation Characteristics, Impact Factor, Journals, Non-Citable Documents.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi07%2F1423-1429