Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Modelling of Climate-Induced Groundwater Recharge for Assessing Carbon Emission from Groundwater Irrigation


Affiliations
1 Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Post Harvest Technology, Central Agricultural University, Gangtok 737 135, India
2 Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
 

In this study impact of climate change on groundwater recharge is investigated and the carbon emission from groundwater irrigation is assessed under projected climate change scenarios for Karnal district of Haryana state in India. HYDRUS-1D and MODFLOW models were used to simulate the climate change impacts on groundwater recharge for different projected climate change scenarios. Simulation results showed that groundwater recharge would increase marginally by 2030 over the baseline year of 2008 under the scenario based on ARIMA predictions, which considered the effect of all climate parameters. However, under the scenarios, which considered only rise in temperature, groundwater recharge would decrease by 0.07–0.22 m. Rise in temperature by 3.5°C and 4.3°C along with 9% and 16% increase in rainfall over the base year would increase the recharge by 0.09 m and 0.14 m respectively. The study also revealed that the effect of climate change on cumulative recharge would be more in sugarcane fields than in rice fields. Carbon emission of groundwater irrigation under the scenarios based on rise in temperature only would increase by a minimum of 12 kg CO2/ha in pearl millet crop by the year 2030 to a maximum of 3250 kg CO2/ha for sugarcane crop by the end of this century. Estimated total carbon emission in 2030 would be 345,857 metric tonne from groundwater irrigation in Karnal district which is 87,474 metric tonne more than the baseline emission.

Keywords

Climate Change, Carbon Emission, Groundwater Modelling, Groundwater Recharge, HYDRUS, MODFLOW.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • CWC, Water and related statistics. Information system organization Water planning and project wing, Central Water Commission, 2010, 1–264.

  • Patle, G. T., Singh, D. K. and Sarangi, A., Modelling of declining groundwater depth in Kurukshetra district, Haryana, India. Curr. Sci., 2016, 111(4), 717–723.

  • Mall, R. K., Bhatla, R. and Pandey, S. N., Water resources in India and impact of climate change. Jalvigyan Sameeksha (Ministry of Water Resources), 2007, 22, 157–176.

  • Stoll, S., Hendricks, Franssen H. J., Butts, M. and Kinzelbach, W., Analysis of the impact of climate change on groundwater related hydrological fluxes: a multi-modal approach including different downscaling methods. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2011, 15(1), 21–38.

  • Brouyere, S., Carabin, G. and Dassargues, A., Climate change impacts on groundwater resources: modelled deficits in a chalky aquifer, Geer basin, Belgium. Hydrogeol. J., 2004, 12(2), 123–134.

  • Ranjan, S. P., Kazama, S. and Sawamoto, M., Effects of climate and land use changes on groundwater resources in coastal aquifers. J. Environ. Manage., 2006, 80(1), 25–35.

  • Jyrkama, M. I. and Sykes, J. F., The impact of climate change on spatially varying groundwater recharge in the Grand River watershed (Ontario). J. Hydrol., 2007, 338(3), 237–250.

  • Ella, V. B., Simulating the hydraulic effects of climate change on groundwater resources in a selected aquifer in the Philippines using a numerical groundwater model. SEARCA Agriculture and Development discussion paper series no. 1, 2011, pp. 1–40.

  • IPCC, Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

  • Eckhardt, K. and Ulbrich, U., Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and stream flow in a central European low mountain range. J. Hydrol., 2003, 284(1), 244–252.

  • Scibek, J. and Allen, D. M., Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and groundwater levels. Water Resour. Res., 2006, 42(11), 1–18.

  • Allen, D. M., Mackie, D. C. and Wei, M., Groundwater and climate change: a sensitivity analysis for the Grand Forks aquifer, southern British Columbia, Canada. Hydrogeol. J., 2004, 12(3), 270–290.

  • Thampi, S. G. and Raneesh, K. Y., Impact of anticipated climate change on direct groundwater recharge in a humid tropical basin based on a simple conceptual model. Hydrol. Process, 2012, 26(11), 1655–1671.

  • Herrera-Pantoja, M. and Hiscock, K. M., The effects of climate change on potential groundwater recharge in Great Britain. Hydrol. Process, 2008, 22(1), 73–86.

  • Dams, J., Salvadore, E., Van Daele T., Ntegeka, V., Willems, P. and Batelaan, O., Spatio-temporal impact of climate change in the groundwater system. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2012, 16(5), 1517–1531.

  • Leterme, B. and Mallants, D., Climate and land use change impacts on groundwater recharge. Proceedings Model CARE 2011 held at Leipzig, Germany, 2011 (IAHS Publ. 3XX, 201X).

  • Leterme, B., Mallants, D. and Jacques, D., Sensitivity of groundwater recharge using climatic analogues and HYDRUS-1D. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2012, 16(8), 2485–2497.

  • Karimi, P., Qureshi, A. S., Bahramloo, R. and Molden, D., Reducing carbon emissions through improved irrigation and ground-water management: A case study from Iran. Agric. Water Manage., 2012, 108, 52–60.

  • Wang, J., Rothausen, S. G. S. A., Conway, D., Zhang, L., Xiong, W., Holman, I. P. and Li, Y., China’s water–energy nexus: green-house-gas emissions from groundwater use for agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett., 2012, 7, 1–10.

  • Sugden, C., Carbon footprint of agricultural development: the potential impact of uptake of small electric and diesel pumps in five countries in Sub Saharan Africa. Stockholm Environment Institute, Working Paper, 2010, pp. 1–23.

  • NPC, State-wise Electricity Consumption and Conservation Potential in India: a summary report prepared by National Productivity Council (NPC) for Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) Ministry of Power, Government of India, 2009, pp. 1–206; www.emtindia.net/eca2009/14Dec2009/combined summary report.pdf (assessed on 28 June 2013).

  • Siebert, S., Burke, J., Faures, J. M., Frenken, K., Hoogeveen, J., Doll, P. and Portmann, F. T., Groundwater use for irrigation – a global inventory. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2010, 14, 1863–1880.

  • Simunek, J., van Genuchten, M Th. and Sejna, M., The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the movement of water, heat and multiple solutes in variably saturated media, Version 4.0. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA, 2009, p. 270.

  • Richards, L. A., Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics, 1931, 1, 313.

  • Patle, G. T., Singh, D. K., Sarangi, A. and Sahoo, R. N., Modelling of groundwater recharge potential from irrigated paddy field under changing climate. Paddy Water Environ., 2017, 15, 413–423.

  • McDonald, M. C. and Harbaugh, A. W., MODFLOW, A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey, Open-file report, 1988, pp. 83–875, Chapter A1.

  • Mualem, Y., A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res., 1976, 12(3), 513–522.

  • Hanay, A., Biiyiiksonmez, F., Kiziloglu, F. M. and Canbolat, M. Y., Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost. Sci. Util., 2004, 12(2), 175–179.

  • Belmans, C., Wesseling, J. G. and Feddes, R. A., Simulation of the water balance of cropped soil: SWATRE. J. Hydrol., 1983, 63, 271–286.

  • Feddes, R. A., Kowalik, P. J. and Zaradny, H., Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, 1978.

  • Phogat, V., Yadav, A. K., Malik, R. S., Kumar, S. and Cox, J., Simulation of salt and water movement and estimation of water productivity of rice crop irrigated with saline water. Paddy Water Environ., 2010, 8(4), 333–346.

  • Ravikumar, V., Vijayakumar, G., Simunek, J., Chellamuthu, S., Santhi, R. and Appavu, K., Evaluation of fertigation scheduling for sugarcane using a vadose zone flow and transport model. Agric. Water Manage., 2011, 98(9), 1431–1440.

  • Wesseling, J. G., Introduction of the occurrence of high ground-water levels and surface water storage in computer program SWATRE, Nota 1636, Institute for Land and Water Management Research (ICW), Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1991.

  • CGWB, Ground water information booklet Karnal district, Haryana. Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Chandigarh, 2007, pp. 1–19; http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/Haryana/Karnal.pdf

  • INCCA, Climate change and India: a 4 x 4 assessment. A sectoral and regional analysis for 2030s. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, 2010, 1–64; http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/fin-rpt-incca.pdf

  • Kumar, K. K., Patwardhan, S. K., Kulkarni, A., Kamala, K., Rao, K. K. and Jones, R., Simulated projections for summer monsoon climate over India by a high-resolution regional climate model (PRECIS). Curr. Sci., 2011, 101(3), 312–326.

  • Patle, G. T., Singh, D. K., Sarangi, A. and Khanna, M., Managing CO2 emission from groundwater pumping for irrigating major crops in trans indogangetic plains of India. Clim. Change, 2016, 136, 265–279.

  • Sood, J., Demand side management of India. Bureau of energy efficiency, 2010; forumofregulators.gov.in/Reference/BEE_NPTI_16.11.10.ppt.

  • Ficklin, D. L., Luedeling, E. and Zhang, M., Sensitivity of groundwater recharge under irrigated agriculture to changes in climate, CO2 concentrations and canopy structure. Agric. Water Manage., 2010, 97(7), 1039–1050.

  • Abiye, T. A., Legesse, D. and Abate, H., Impact of climate change on groundwater recharge: a case study from the Ethiopian Rift. Groundwater and Climate in Africa, Proceedings of the Kampala Conference, IAHS Publication, 2009, 334, 174–180.

  • Patle, G. T., Singh, D. K., Sarangi, A., Rai, A., Khanna, M. and Sahoo, R. N., Temporal variability of climatic parameters and potential evapotranspiration. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2013, 83(4), 518–524.

  • Patle, G. T., Singh, D. K., Sarangi, A., Rai, A., Khanna, M. and Sahoo, R. N., Time series analysis of groundwater levels and projection of future trend. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2015, 85, 232–242.


Abstract Views: 378

PDF Views: 143




  • Modelling of Climate-Induced Groundwater Recharge for Assessing Carbon Emission from Groundwater Irrigation

Abstract Views: 378  |  PDF Views: 143

Authors

G. T. Patle
Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Post Harvest Technology, Central Agricultural University, Gangtok 737 135, India
D. K. Singh
Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
A. Sarangi
Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


In this study impact of climate change on groundwater recharge is investigated and the carbon emission from groundwater irrigation is assessed under projected climate change scenarios for Karnal district of Haryana state in India. HYDRUS-1D and MODFLOW models were used to simulate the climate change impacts on groundwater recharge for different projected climate change scenarios. Simulation results showed that groundwater recharge would increase marginally by 2030 over the baseline year of 2008 under the scenario based on ARIMA predictions, which considered the effect of all climate parameters. However, under the scenarios, which considered only rise in temperature, groundwater recharge would decrease by 0.07–0.22 m. Rise in temperature by 3.5°C and 4.3°C along with 9% and 16% increase in rainfall over the base year would increase the recharge by 0.09 m and 0.14 m respectively. The study also revealed that the effect of climate change on cumulative recharge would be more in sugarcane fields than in rice fields. Carbon emission of groundwater irrigation under the scenarios based on rise in temperature only would increase by a minimum of 12 kg CO2/ha in pearl millet crop by the year 2030 to a maximum of 3250 kg CO2/ha for sugarcane crop by the end of this century. Estimated total carbon emission in 2030 would be 345,857 metric tonne from groundwater irrigation in Karnal district which is 87,474 metric tonne more than the baseline emission.

Keywords


Climate Change, Carbon Emission, Groundwater Modelling, Groundwater Recharge, HYDRUS, MODFLOW.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi1%2F64-73