Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Enhanced Fire Severity in Modern Indian Dwellings


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar - 382 355, India
 

The present study focuses on assessment and probabilistic characterization of fire load, a key input to performance-based fire design, in office and dormitory buildings in India. A survey using combined inventory- weighing method was conducted and the results analysed with respect to several parameters such as room use, type of combustibles, etc. Probabilistic models based on the generalized extreme value and gamma probability density functions have been proposed for fire load energy density. It has been found that, on an average, the fire load present in modern buildings is about three times greater than what is reported by earlier studies and prescribed by building codes. Thus, the severity of potential fires that can occur in a compartment has increased considerably. Parametric fire curves have been developed and compared with standard fire curves to assess the increase in severity. The developed fire curves possess a greater growth rate and predict a greater temperature within the first one hour, when compared to the standard curves, showing that there is a greater fire risk.

Keywords

Design Fire, Enhanced Fire Risk, Fire Load Energy Density, Fire Load Survey.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Joseph, S. and Singh, V., Changing lifestyles influencing Indian consumers: conceptualizing and indentifying future directions. Glob. J. Manage. Bus. Stud., 2013, 3(8), 2248–9878.

  • Ljungberg, Y. L., Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater. Design, 2007, 28(2), 466–479.

  • Baldwin, R., Law, M., Allen, G. and Griffiths, L. G., Survey of fire loads in modern office buildings – some preliminary results. Fire Safety Sci., 1970, 808, 1.

  • Culver, C., Survey results for fire loads and live loads in office buildings. US Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, 1976, no. 85.

  • Kumar, S. and Rao, C. K., Fire loads in office buildings. J. Struct. Engg., 1997, 123(3), 365–368.

  • Barnett, C. R., Pilot fire load survey carried out for the New Zealand Fire Protection Association, MacDonald Barnett Partners, Auckland, 1984.

  • Narayanan, P., Fire severities for structural fire engineering design. BRANZ, 1995.

  • Kose, S. A., Motishita, Y., Hagiwara, I. C., Tsukagoshi, I. S., Matsunobu, S. U. and Kawagoe, K. U., Survey of movable fire load in Japanese dwellings. Fire Safety Sci., 1989, 2, 403–412.

  • Kumar, S. and Rao, C. K., Fire load in residential buildings. Build. Environ., 1995, 30(2), 299–305.

  • Zalok, E., Validation of methodologies to determine fire load for use in structural fire protection. Fire Protection Research Foundation, 2011, 1–65.

  • Bush, B., Anno, G., McCoy, R., Gaj, R. and Small, R. D., Fuel loads in US cities. Fire Technol., 1991, 27(1), 5–32.

  • Gao, W., Sun, J., Zhang, Y. and Rong, J., Fire load in students’ dormitory buildings. Int. J. Recent Res. Appl. Stud., 2013, 14, 456–463.

  • Zalok, E. and Eduful, J., Assessment of fuel load survey methodologies and its impact on fire load data. Fire Safety J., 2013, 62(PART C), 299–310.

  • United Nations. The World’s Cities in 2016 – Data Booklet (ST/ESA/SER.A/392). World’s Cities 2016, 2016.

  • National Fire Protection Association. NFPA 557 Standard for Determination of Fire Loads for Use in Structural Fire Protection Design, 2011.

  • Buchanan, A. H., Structural Design for Fire Safety, Wiley, New York, 2001, vol. 273.

  • Issen, L. A., Single-family residential fire and live loads survey. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1980.

  • Thauvoye, C. H., Zhao, B., Klein, J. O. and Fontana, M. A., Fire load survey and statistical analysis. Fire Safety Sci., 2008, 9, 991–1002.

  • Babrauskas, V., Heat Release Rates. The SFPE handbook of fire protection and engineering. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.

  • Holman, J. P., Heat Transfer, McGran-Hill Book Company, Soythern Methodist University, 1986.

  • Kanury, A. M., Introduction to Combustion Phenomena, CRC Press, 1975, vol. 2.

  • EN BS. 1-2: 2002 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures-Part 1-2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire. British Standards, 1991.


Abstract Views: 263

PDF Views: 79




  • Enhanced Fire Severity in Modern Indian Dwellings

Abstract Views: 263  |  PDF Views: 79

Authors

Nasar Ahmad Khan
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar - 382 355, India
Gaurav Srivastava
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar - 382 355, India

Abstract


The present study focuses on assessment and probabilistic characterization of fire load, a key input to performance-based fire design, in office and dormitory buildings in India. A survey using combined inventory- weighing method was conducted and the results analysed with respect to several parameters such as room use, type of combustibles, etc. Probabilistic models based on the generalized extreme value and gamma probability density functions have been proposed for fire load energy density. It has been found that, on an average, the fire load present in modern buildings is about three times greater than what is reported by earlier studies and prescribed by building codes. Thus, the severity of potential fires that can occur in a compartment has increased considerably. Parametric fire curves have been developed and compared with standard fire curves to assess the increase in severity. The developed fire curves possess a greater growth rate and predict a greater temperature within the first one hour, when compared to the standard curves, showing that there is a greater fire risk.

Keywords


Design Fire, Enhanced Fire Risk, Fire Load Energy Density, Fire Load Survey.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi2%2F320-325