Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Stress Azimuth Data Derived by Geogenic Electromagnetic Radiation Technique and from the Analysis of Exhumation Joints


Affiliations
1 Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal 462066, India
 

During the last decade, considerable progress has been made to understand the cause and nature of electromagnetic emission anomalies that precede major earthquakes1,2. Based on field measurements using a portable instrument, the preferred orientations of geogenic electromagnetic radiation (EMR), especially the principal directions of radiation have been proved to be reproducible and are related to the stress field of the lithosphere3– 6.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bahat, D., Rabinovitch, A. and Frid, V., Environ. Eng. Geosci., 2006, 12, 287– 288.

  • Morgounov, V. A. and Malzev, S. A., Tectonophysics, 2007, 431, 61–72.

  • Lichtenberger, M., J. Struct. Geol., 2005, 27, 2150–2158.

  • Lichtenberger, M., Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaontol. Abh., 2006, 238, 279–312.

  • Lichtenberger, M., Pure Appl. Geophys., 2006, 163, 1661–1677.

  • Mallik, J., Mathew, G., Angerer, T. and Greiling, R. O., J. Geodyn., 2008, 45, 234–245.

  • Rabinovitch, A., Frid, V. and Bahat, D., Tectonophysics, 2007, 431, 15–21.

  • Freund, F. and Sornette, D., Tectonophysics, 2007, 431, 33–47.

  • Ramsay, J. G. and Huber, M. I., The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology, Volume 2. Folds and Fractures, Academic Press, London, 1987.

  • Frid, V., Pure Appl. Geophys., 2001, 158, 931–944.

  • Gol’d, R. M., Markov, G. and Mogila, P. G., Phys. Solid Earth, 1975, 7, 109– 111.

  • Miroshnishencko, M. and Kuksenko, V., Sov. Phys. Solid State, 1980, 22, 895– 896.

  • Khatiashvili, N. G., Gerlands Beitr. Geophys., 1988, 97, 287–295.

  • Frid, V., Bahat, D. and Rabinovitch, A., J. Struct. Geol., 2005, 27, 145–159.

  • Krylov, S. M. and Nikiforova, N. N., Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, 1996, 6, 499–512.

  • Reuther, C. et al., Mitt. Geol.Palaeontol. Inst. Univ. Hamburg, 2002, 86, 1–12.

  • Gowd, T. N., Srirama Rao, S. V. and Gaur, V. K., J. Geophys. Res., 1992, 97, 11,879–11,888.


Abstract Views: 374

PDF Views: 113




  • Comparison of Stress Azimuth Data Derived by Geogenic Electromagnetic Radiation Technique and from the Analysis of Exhumation Joints

Abstract Views: 374  |  PDF Views: 113

Authors

Shreeja Das
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal 462066, India
Jyotirmoy Mallik
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal 462066, India
Ayanangshu Das
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal 462066, India
Krishanu Bandyopadhyay
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal 462066, India

Abstract


During the last decade, considerable progress has been made to understand the cause and nature of electromagnetic emission anomalies that precede major earthquakes1,2. Based on field measurements using a portable instrument, the preferred orientations of geogenic electromagnetic radiation (EMR), especially the principal directions of radiation have been proved to be reproducible and are related to the stress field of the lithosphere3– 6.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi6%2F1039-1041