Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Grand Challenge and Ethics of the ‘Central Science’


Affiliations
1 Adenwala Road, Rustom Mansion, Mumbai 400 019, India
 

Chemistry, one of the main branches of natural science, has been called the ‘central science’. Whether or not it has ‘easily articulated grand challenges’, a question posed in Nature is an intriguing one1. Could it be that ‘easy articulation’, an advantage enjoyed by physics and biology, may actually mean more of packaging and less of substance? If so, then ethical advocacy of all science and not just chemistry must start with a look at funding of science.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • As quoted by Matlin, S. A. et al., Chem. Eng. News, 6 February 2017, p. 20.
  • Bhaduri, S., Curr. Sci., 2015, 109(6), 1024.
  • Haskel, J. and Westlake, S., Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy, Princeton University Press, USA, 2017.
  • Bhaduri, S., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(1), 18.
  • Bhaduri, S., J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 2003, 12, 303.
  • Bhaduri, S., Times of India, 8 January 2013.
  • Bhaduri, S., Curr. Sci., 2014, 106(9), 1182.
  • Bhaduri, S., Hindustan Times, 12 October 2015.
  • Hoffman, S., US Patent, 644077.
  • Shirakawa, H., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2574.
  • Haber, F. and Le Rossignol, R., US Patent, 1202995 A.
  • Evenson, R. E. and Gollin, D., Science, 2003, 300, 758.
  • Tiwari, S. C., Curr. Sci., 2003, 85(5), 578.
  • Nabar-Bhaduri, S. and Bhaduri, S., Curr. Sci., 2005, 89(7), 1076.
  • Smil, V., Nature, 1999, 400, 415.
  • Stern, F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 50–56.
  • Kaiser, D., Nature, 2015, 523, 523.
  • Balram, P., Curr. Sci., 2010, 98(12), 1247.
  • Eckerman, I., The Bhopal Saga, University Press, India, 2005.

Abstract Views: 422

PDF Views: 130




  • The Grand Challenge and Ethics of the ‘Central Science’

Abstract Views: 422  |  PDF Views: 130

Authors

Sumit Bhaduri
Adenwala Road, Rustom Mansion, Mumbai 400 019, India

Abstract


Chemistry, one of the main branches of natural science, has been called the ‘central science’. Whether or not it has ‘easily articulated grand challenges’, a question posed in Nature is an intriguing one1. Could it be that ‘easy articulation’, an advantage enjoyed by physics and biology, may actually mean more of packaging and less of substance? If so, then ethical advocacy of all science and not just chemistry must start with a look at funding of science.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi10%2F1852-1853