Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evapotranspiration and Crop Coefficient of Okra under Subsurface Drip with and without Plastic Mulch


Affiliations
1 Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, India
 

Field experiments using lysimeters were conducted in sub-humid climatic condition to estimate water balance parameters, regional crop coefficient development and to evaluate yield response of okra crop under subsurface drip (SSD) irrigation with and without plastic mulch. In the year 2016, total crop evapotranspiration under SSD with and without plastic mulch was 403 and 512 mm respectively, whereas in 2017 it was 363 and 468 mm respectively. Average crop coefficient of okra was 0.31, 0.42, 0.68, 0.77 and 0.48 measured under SSD with plastic mulch condition, and 0.51, 0.72, 0.92, 0.93 and 0.53 without plastic mulch. High yield of okra with minimum crop evapotranspiration was observed under SSD with plastic mulch treatment due to lower irrigation water requirement, minimum evaporation and less weed transpiration under plastic film compared to nonmulch condition.

Keywords

Crop Coefficient, Evaporation, Okra, Plastic Mulch Condition, Subsurface Drip Irrigation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Patel, N. and Rajput, T. B. S., Dynamics and modeling of soil water under subsurface drip irrigated onion. Agric. Water Manage., 2008, 95, 1335–1349.
  • Evett, S. R., Howell, T. A. and Schneider, A. D., Energy and water balances for surface and subsurface drip irrigated corn. In Proceedings of the Fifth International MI Congress, Orlando, FL, USA, 1995, pp. 135–140.
  • Zimmer, A. L., McFarland, M. J. and Moore, J., Upward free water movement from buried trickle emitters. In Ann. Int. Sum. Meet. the ASAE, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA, ASAE, Paper No. 88-2063, 26–29 June 1988, p. 16.
  • Grattan, S. R., Schwankl, L. J. and Lanini, W. T., Weed control by subsurface drip irrigation. Calif. Agric., 1988, 22–24.
  • Singh, D. K. and Rajput, T. B. S., Response of lateral placement depths of subsurface drip irrigation on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Int. J. Plant Prod., 2007, 1, 73–84.
  • Tiwari, K. N., Mal, P. K., Singh, R. M. and Chattopadhyay, A., Response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) to drip irrigation under mulch and non-mulch conditions. Agric. Water Manage., 1998, 38, 91–102.
  • Patil, A. P. and Tiwari, K. N., Okra crop response under subsurface drip and conventional furrow irrigation with varying N fertilization. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2018; https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1510953.
  • Patil, A. P. and Tiwari, K. N., Quantification of transpiration and evapouration of okra under subsurface drip irrigation using SIMDualKc model during vegetative development. Int. J. Veg. Sci., 2018; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19315260.2018.1462875
  • Shukla, S., Jaber, F. H., Goswami, D. and Srivastava, S., Evapotranspiration losses for pepper under plastic mulch and shallow water table conditions. Irrig. Sci., 2013, 31, 523–536.
  • Srivastava, R. K., Panda, R. K., Chakraborty, A. and Halder, D., Enhancing grain yield, biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of maize by varying sowing dates and nitrogen rate under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Field. Crops Res., 2017; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429017304379
  • Srivastava, R. K., Panda, R. K. and Halder, D., Effective crop evapotranspiration measurement using time-domain reflectometry technique in a sub-humid region. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 2017, 129, 1211–1225.
  • Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Perrier, A. and Pereira, L. S., An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bull., 1994, 43(2), 1–34.
  • Steele, D. D., Sajid, A. H. and Prunty, L. D., New corn evapotranspiration crop curves for southeastern North Dakota. Trans. ASABE, 1996, 39(2), 931–936.
  • Danso, E. O. et al., Effect of different fertilization and irrigation methods on nitrogen uptake, intercepted radiation and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentum L.) grown in the Keta sand spit of southeast Ghana. Agric. Water Manage., 2015, 147, 34–42.
  • Liu, C., Zhang, X. and Zhang, Y., Determination of daily evapouration and evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize by large scale weighing lysimeter and micro-lysimeter. Agric. For. Meteorol., 2002, 111, 109–120.
  • Lament Jr, W. J., Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. Hort. Technol., 1993, 35–39.
  • Wan, Y. and El-Swaify, S. A., Runoff and soil erosion as affected by plastic mulch in a Hawaiian pineapple field. Soil Till. Res., 1999, 52, 29–35.
  • Araya, A., Stroosnijder, L., Girmay, G. and Keesstra, S. D., Crop coefficient, yield response to water stress and water productivity of teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)). Agric. Water Manage., 2011, 98, 775–783.
  • Farahani, H. J., Oweis, T. Y. and Izzi, G., Crop coefficient for drip irrigated cotton in a Mediterranean environment. Irrig. Sci., 2008, 26, 375–383.
  • Steinmetz, Z. et al., Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading shortterm agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation. Sci. Total Environ., 2016, 550, 690–705.

Abstract Views: 268

PDF Views: 84




  • Evapotranspiration and Crop Coefficient of Okra under Subsurface Drip with and without Plastic Mulch

Abstract Views: 268  |  PDF Views: 84

Authors

Ashish Patil
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, India
K. N. Tiwari
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, India

Abstract


Field experiments using lysimeters were conducted in sub-humid climatic condition to estimate water balance parameters, regional crop coefficient development and to evaluate yield response of okra crop under subsurface drip (SSD) irrigation with and without plastic mulch. In the year 2016, total crop evapotranspiration under SSD with and without plastic mulch was 403 and 512 mm respectively, whereas in 2017 it was 363 and 468 mm respectively. Average crop coefficient of okra was 0.31, 0.42, 0.68, 0.77 and 0.48 measured under SSD with plastic mulch condition, and 0.51, 0.72, 0.92, 0.93 and 0.53 without plastic mulch. High yield of okra with minimum crop evapotranspiration was observed under SSD with plastic mulch treatment due to lower irrigation water requirement, minimum evaporation and less weed transpiration under plastic film compared to nonmulch condition.

Keywords


Crop Coefficient, Evaporation, Okra, Plastic Mulch Condition, Subsurface Drip Irrigation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi12%2F2249-2258