Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Determination of an Effective Pollinator for the Rare and Endangered Urophysa rochkii and the Effects of its Floral Organs on Flower Visiting by Insects


Affiliations
1 Key Laboratory of Ecological Security and Protection of Sichuan Province, Eco Environmental Engineering Technology Research Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China
 

Pollination is an important part of fertilization and reproduction in seed plants. Pollen movement largely restricts gene flow among individual plants and the manner of reproduction in a population, thereby affecting the genetic traits and fitness of plant offspring. For insect-pollinator-based plants, the flower-visiting characteristics, frequency and timing of the pollinating insects have decisive effects on the successful pollination of plants, whereas the colour and morphology of various floral components are important factors affecting the pollinating insects. Based on the pollination biology of plants, we studied the pollination mechanisms and links of Urophysa rochkii to understand its endangered status. Using U. rochkii at the full flowering period for the study, and using methods to observe, record, and perform experimental analysis, we recorded the species, frequency and flowervisiting time of these insects every 15 min and observed the effects of weather and temperature on the insects. Additionally, we captured the flowervisiting insects, brought them to the laboratory, and took photographs under a dissecting electron microscope for observation and identification. U. rochkii plants were grouped under different treatments that included removal of sepals, stamens and or pistils, while untreated plants were included as control group. In summary, the effects of floral components on the pollination process were examined. The experimental results showed that the effective pollinator of U. rochkii was Apis cerana Fabricius, and that sky-blue sepal was the most important factor affecting the flowervisiting frequency of the pollinators.

Keywords

Pollination Biology, Flower-Visiting Insects, Floral Organs, Urophysa rochkii.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Klinkhamer, P., Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Ann. Bot., 2006, 98, 899–900.

  • Khors, Rosa, R. and Koptur, S., New findings on the pollination biology of Mauritia flexuosa (Arecaceae) in Roraima, Brazil: Linking dioecy, wind, and habitat. Am. J. Bot., 2013, 100(3), 613– 621.

  • La Rosa, R. J. and Conner, J. K., Floral function: effects of traits on pollinators, male and female pollination success, and female fitness across three species of milkweeds (Asclepias). Am. J. Bot., 2017, 104, 150–160.

  • Ollerton, J., Winfree, R. and tarrant, How many plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos, 2011, 120, 321–326.

  • Cox, P. A. and Grubb, P. J., Abiotic pollination: an evolutionary. escape for animal-pollinated angiosperms (and discussion). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 1991, 333, 217–224.

  • Proctor, M., Yeo, P. and Lack, A., The Natural History of Pollination, Portland, Timber Press, Ohio, USA, 1996.

  • Thien, L. B., Azuma, H. and Kawano, S., New perspectives on the pollination biology of basal angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci., 2000, 161, S225–S235.

  • Wyatt, R., Inflorescence architecture: how flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. Am. J. Bot., 1982, 69, 585–594.

  • Richards, A. J. and Holsinger, K. E., Plant breeding systems. Trends Plant Sci., 1997, 2, 485–485.

  • Harder, L. D. and Barrett, S. C., Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. Floral Biology, 1996, 140–190.

  • Williams, C. F., Ruvinsky, J. and Hews, S. D. K., Pollination, breeding system, and genetic structure in two sympatric Delphinium (Ranunculaceae) species. Am. J. Bot., 2001, 88(9), 1623– 1633.

  • Muchhala, N., The pollination biology of Burmeistera (Campanulaceae): specialization and syndromes. Am. J. Bot., 2006, 93, 1081–1089.

  • Thomson, J. When is it mutualism? Am. Nat., 2003, 162, S1–S9.

  • Hobbhahn, N., Küchmeister, H. and Porembski, S., Pollination biology of mass flowering terrestrial Utricularia species (Lentibulariaceae) in the Indian Western Ghats. Plant Biol., 2006, 8(6), 791–804.

  • De Jong, T. J. D., Waser, N. M. and Klinkhamer, P. G., Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends Ecol. Evol., 1993, 8(9), 321–325.

  • Brys, R., Geens, B., Beeckman, T. and Jacquemyn, H., Differences in dichogamy and herkogamy contribute to higher selfing in contrasting environments in the annual Blackstonia perfoliata (Gentianaceae). Ann. Bot., 2013, 111(4), 651–661.

  • Kearns, C. A. and Inouye, D. W., Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1998, 29(1), 83–112.

  • Moody-Weis, J. M. and Heywood, J. S., Pollination limitation to reproductive success in the Missouri evening primrose, Oenothera macrocarpa (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot., 2001, 88, 1615–1622.

  • Ashman, T. L., Knight, T. M., Steets, J. A., Amarasekare, P. and Wilson, W. G., Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology, 2004, 85(9), 2408–2421.

  • Dupont, Y. L., Damgaard, C. and Simonsen, V., Quantitative historical change in bumblebee Bombus spp.) assemblages of red clover fields. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6, e25172.

  • Bommarco, R., Lundin, O., Smith, H. G., and Rundlöf, M., Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 2012, 279(1727), 309–315.

  • Biesmeijer, J. C., Parallel declines in pollinators and insectpollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science, 2006, 313, 351–354.

  • Doi, H., Gordo, O. and Katano, I., Heterogeneous intra-annual climatic changes drive different phenological responses at two trophic levels. Climate Research, 2008, 36(3), 181–190.

  • McKinney, A. M., Asynchronous changes in phenology of migrating Broad-tailed Hummingbirds and their early-season nectar resources. Ecology, 2012, 93, 1987–1993.

  • Pyke, G. H., Thomson, J. D., Inouye, D. W., Miller, T. J. and Peters, D. P. C., Effects of climate change on phenologies and distributions of bumble bees and the plants they visit. Ecosphere, 2016, 7(3), e01267.

  • Herrera, C. M., Sanchez-Lafuente, A. M., Medrano, M., Guitian, J. and Rey, P., Geographical variation in autonomous selfpollination levels unrelated to pollinator service in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot., 2001, 88(6), 1025–1032.

  • Zhang, Y. X., Hu, H. Y. and He, X. J., Genetic diversity of Urophysa rockii Uibrich, an endangered and rare species, detected by ISSR. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013, 33(6), 1098–1105.

  • Yun-Xiang, Z., Hao-Yu, H. U., Li-Juan, Y., Chang-Bao, W. and Xing-Jin, H. E., Seed dispersal and germination of an endangered and rare species Urophysarockii (Ranunculaceae). Plant Divers. Resour., 2013, 35, 303–309.

  • Bo, Z., Shijian, L., Li, S., Dafang, Z., Dehuai, W. and Shuangyan, X., Establishment and optimization of SCo T-PCR System of an endangered and rare species Urophysa rockii Ulbr. Mol. Plant Breed., 2016, 14(09), 2453–2459.

  • Jin-Yao, H. U., Dan, L., Xiao-Hong, J. and Ze-Yuan, S. U., A preliminary study on soil properties of Urophysa rockii community. J. Mianyang Normal Univ., 2010, 29, 72–75.

  • Ulbrich, E. Ranunculaceae novae vel criticae VIII. Notizblatt Des Königl Botanischen Gartens und Museums Zu Berlin, 1929, 10, 863–880.

  • Pengfei, B., Ting, T., Jinyao, H. U. and Wei, J., Flowering phenology and breeding system of an endangered and rare species Urophysa rockii (Ranunculaceae). Acta Ecol. Sin., 2018; http://dx.doi.org/10.5846/stxb201705160905.

  • Du, B. and Yang, F., Urophysa rockii Ulbr. a rare and endangered plant needs urgent conservation. Curr. Sci., 2010, 99, 419–420.

  • Dafni, A., Pollination Ecology: A Practical Approach, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1992, pp. l–57.

  • Group, T. A. P., An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 1998, 85(4), 531–553.

  • Wu, Z. Y., Lu, A. M., Tang, Y. C., Chen, Z. D. and Li, D. Z., The Families and Genera of Angiosperms in China, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2003, pp. 23–34.

  • Farkas, Á. and Orosz-Kovács, Z., Nectar secretion dynamics of Hungarian local pear cultivars. Plant Syst. Evol., 2003, 238, 57– 67.

  • Galloni, M. and Cristofolini, G., Floral rewards and pollination in Cytiseae (Fabaceae). Plant Syst. Evol., 2003, 238, 127–137.

  • Herrera, C. M., Components of pollinator ‘quality’: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos, 1987, 50, 79–90.

  • Herrera, C. M., Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the ‘quantity’ component in a plant– pollinator system. Oecologia, 1989, 80, 241–248.

  • Schupp, E. W., Jordano, P., Gómez, J. M. and Janneke, H. R. L., A general framework for effectiveness concepts in mutualisms. Ecol. Lett., 2017, 20(5), 577–590.

  • Keys, R. N., and Smith, B. S. E., Pollination effectiveness and pollination efficiency of insects foraging Prosopis velutina in southeastern Arizona. J. Appl. Ecol., 1995, 32, 519–527.

  • Lehnebach, C. and Riveros, M., Pollination biology of the Chilean endemic orchid Chloraea lamellata. Biodivers. Conserv., 2003, 12, 1741–1751.

  • Zhao, L., Gong, J. Z., Zhang, X. H., Liu, Y. Q. and Ren, Y., Floral organogenesis in Urophysa rockii, a rediscovered endangered and rare species of Ranunculaceae. Botany, 2016, 94(3).

  • Silvana, M.-R., Fenster, C. B., Agnarsson, I., Skog, L. E. and Zimmer, E. A., Evolutionary breakdown of pollination specialization in a Caribbean plant radiation. New Phytol., 2010, 188, 403– 417.

  • Zhao, Y. L., A survey on the study of pollination biology of orchidaceous plants. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1994, 11, 27–33.

  • Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. and Ollerton, J., Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology, 1996, 77(4), 1043–1060.


Abstract Views: 336

PDF Views: 122




  • Determination of an Effective Pollinator for the Rare and Endangered Urophysa rochkii and the Effects of its Floral Organs on Flower Visiting by Insects

Abstract Views: 336  |  PDF Views: 122

Authors

Pengfei Bie
Key Laboratory of Ecological Security and Protection of Sichuan Province, Eco Environmental Engineering Technology Research Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China
Ting Tang
Key Laboratory of Ecological Security and Protection of Sichuan Province, Eco Environmental Engineering Technology Research Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China
Jinyao Hu
Key Laboratory of Ecological Security and Protection of Sichuan Province, Eco Environmental Engineering Technology Research Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China
Lushui Zhang
Key Laboratory of Ecological Security and Protection of Sichuan Province, Eco Environmental Engineering Technology Research Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China
Qiuyue Zhao
Key Laboratory of Ecological Security and Protection of Sichuan Province, Eco Environmental Engineering Technology Research Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang 621000, China

Abstract


Pollination is an important part of fertilization and reproduction in seed plants. Pollen movement largely restricts gene flow among individual plants and the manner of reproduction in a population, thereby affecting the genetic traits and fitness of plant offspring. For insect-pollinator-based plants, the flower-visiting characteristics, frequency and timing of the pollinating insects have decisive effects on the successful pollination of plants, whereas the colour and morphology of various floral components are important factors affecting the pollinating insects. Based on the pollination biology of plants, we studied the pollination mechanisms and links of Urophysa rochkii to understand its endangered status. Using U. rochkii at the full flowering period for the study, and using methods to observe, record, and perform experimental analysis, we recorded the species, frequency and flowervisiting time of these insects every 15 min and observed the effects of weather and temperature on the insects. Additionally, we captured the flowervisiting insects, brought them to the laboratory, and took photographs under a dissecting electron microscope for observation and identification. U. rochkii plants were grouped under different treatments that included removal of sepals, stamens and or pistils, while untreated plants were included as control group. In summary, the effects of floral components on the pollination process were examined. The experimental results showed that the effective pollinator of U. rochkii was Apis cerana Fabricius, and that sky-blue sepal was the most important factor affecting the flowervisiting frequency of the pollinators.

Keywords


Pollination Biology, Flower-Visiting Insects, Floral Organs, Urophysa rochkii.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi12%2F2055-2062