Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Recent Progress on the Water–Energy–Food Nexus using Bibliometric Analysis


Affiliations
1 College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
2 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
 

A systematic overview of the water–energy–food nexus studies is presented using bibliometric analysis. We have used the Web of Science Core Collection data from 2010 to 2017 for the same. The main subject categories include environmental science and water resources. Water and Environmental Science & Policy are two typical journals. USA, England and Germany are productive countries, while the main institutions are Oxford University, International Water Management Institute, and International Food Policy Research Institute. The frequently cited papers and keywords revealed the research hotspots and trends, with the major concerns of the concept and mechanism, research dimensions and nexus methodologies.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis, Recent Progress, Systematic Overview, Water–Energy–Food Nexus.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Zhang, C., Chen, X., Li, Y., Ding, W. and Fu, G., Water–energy– food nexus: concepts, questions and methodologies. J Clean Prod., 2018, 195, 625–639.

  • Hoff, H., Understanding the nexus. Background paper for the bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus, Stockholm, Sweden, 2011.

  • Romerolankao, P., Mcphearson, T. and Davidson, D. J., The food– energy–water nexus and urban complexity. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7, 233–235.

  • Liu, J. et al., Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy– food nexus. Hydrol. Sci. J., 2017, 62, 1714–1720.

  • Chang, Y., Li, G., Yao, Y., Zhang, L. and Yu, C., Quantifying the water–energy–food nexus: current status and trends. Energies, 2016, 9, 65.

  • Märker, C., Venghaus, S. and Hake, J.-F., Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus – the scope of action for institutional change. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 2018, 97, 290–300.

  • Endo, A., Tsurita, I., Burnett, K. and Orencio, P. M., A review of the current state of research on the water, energy, and food nexus. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 2016, 11.

  • Uen, T.-S., Chang, F.-J., Zhou, Y. and Tsai, W.-P., Exploring synergistic benefits of water–food–energy nexus through multiobjective reservoir optimization schemes. Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 633, 341–351.

  • Li, G., Huang, D., Sun, C. and Li, Y., Developing interpretive structural modeling based on factor analysis for the water–energy– food nexus conundrum. Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 651, 309–322.

  • Jacobs, D., Demystification of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics and webometrics. In 11th DIS Annual Conference, University of Zululand, South Africa, 2010.

  • Mao, G., Liu, X., Du, H., Zuo, J. and Wang, L., Way forward for alternative energy research: A bibliometric analysis during 1994– 2013. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 2015, 48, 276–286.

  • Chen, D., Liu, Z., Luo, Z. H., Webber, M. and Chen, J., Bibliometric and visualized analysis of emergy research. Ecol. Eng., 2016, 90, 285–293.

  • Zhang, Y., Huang, K., Yu, Y. and Yang, B., Mapping of water footprint research: a bibliometric analysis during 2006–2015. J. Clean Prod., 2017, 149, 70–79.

  • Khan, M. A. and Ho, Y.-S., Top-cited articles in environmental sciences: merits and demerits of citation analysis. Sci. Total Environ., 2012, 431, 122–127.

  • Mao, G., Huang, N., Chen, L. and Wang, H., Research on biomass energy and environment from the past to the future: a bibliometric analysis. Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 635, 1081–1090.

  • Liu, X., Liang, Z. and Song, H., Global biodiversity research during 1900–2009: a bibliometric analysis. Biodiver. Conserv., 2011, 20, 807–826.

  • Chen, C., CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006, 57, 359–377.

  • Chiu, W. T. and Ho, Y. S., Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 2007, 73, 3–17.

  • Buela-Casal, G., What do the scientists think about the impact factor? Scientometrics, 2012, 92, 281–292.

  • Garfield, E., The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 2006, 295, 90–93.

  • Fu, H. Z., Ho, Y. S., Sui, Y. M. and Li, Z. S., A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993–2008. Waste Manage., 2010, 30, 2410–2417.

  • Hirsch, J. E., An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 2010, 85, 741–754.

  • Hirsch, J. E., An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005, 102, 16569–16572.

  • Hirsch, J. E. and Buela-Casal, G., The meaning of the h-index. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol., 2014, 14, 161–164.

  • Newman, M. E. J. and Newman, M. E. J. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Phys. Rev. E, 2001, 64, 016131.

  • Ye, Q., Song, H. and Li, T., Cross-institutional collaboration networks in tourism and hospitality research. Tourism Manage. Perspect., 2012, 2–3, 55–64.

  • Nunkoo, R., Gursoy, D. and Ramkissoon, H., Developments in hospitality marketing and management: social network analysis and research themes. J. Hosp. Market. Manage., 2013, 22, 269–288.

  • Bazilian, M. et al., Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy, 2011, 39, 7896–7906.

  • Siddiqi, A. A. and Diaz, L., The water–energy nexus in Middle East and North Africa. Energ. Policy, 2011, 38, 4529–4540.

  • Ringler, C., Bhaduri, A. and Lawford, R., The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): potential for improved resource use efficiency? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust., 2013, 5, 617–624.

  • Benson, D., Gain, A. K. and Rouillard, J. J., Water governance in a comparative perspective: from IWRM to a ‘nexus’ approach? Water Altern., 2015, 8, 756–773.

  • Biggs, E. M. et al., Sustainable development and the water– energy–food nexus: a perspective on livelihoods. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2015, 54, 389–397.

  • Garcia, D. J. and You, F., The water–energy–food nexus and process systems engineering: a new focus. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2016, 91, 49–67.

  • Hou, Q., Mao, G., Zhao, L., Du, H. and Zuo, J., Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2015, 20, 541–555.

  • de Amorim, W. S. et al., The nexus between water, energy, and food in the context of the global risks: an analysis of the interactions between food, water, and energy security. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 2018, 72, 1–11.

  • Mirzabaev, A. et al., Bioenergy, food security and poverty reduction: trade-offs and synergies along the water–energy–food security nexus. Water Int., 2015, 40, 772–790.

  • Chen, S. and Chen, B., Urban energy–water nexus: a network perspective. Appl. Energ., 2016, 184, 905–914.

  • Daher, B. T. and Mohtar, R. H., Water–energy–food (WEF) nexus tool 2.0: guiding integrative resource planning and decisionmaking. Water Int., 2015, 40, 748–771.

  • Kaddoura, S. and Khatib, S. E., Review of water–energy–food nexus tools to improve the nexus modelling approach for integrated policy making. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2017, 77, 114–121.

  • Giupponi, C. and Gain, A. K., Integrated spatial assessment of the water, energy and food dimensions of the sustainable development goals. Reg. Environ. Change, 2017, 17, 1881–1893.

  • Zhang, X. and Vesselinov, V. V., Integrated modeling approach for optimal management of water, energy and food security nexus. Adv. Water Resour., 2017, 101, 1–10.

  • Vora, N., Shah, A., Bilec, M. M. and Khanna, V., Food–energy– water nexus: quantifying embodied energy and ghg emissions from irrigation through virtual water transfers in food trade. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 2119–2128.

  • Howarth, C. and Monasterolo, I., Opportunities for knowledge co-production across the energy–food–water nexus: making interdisciplinary approaches work for better climate decision making. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2017, 75, 103–110.

  • Kurian, M., The water–energy–food nexus: trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2016, 68, 97–106.

  • Hennig, T., Damming the transnational Ayeyarwady Basin. Hydropower and the water–energy nexus. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2016, 65, 1232–1246.

  • Hennig, T., Wang, W., Magee, D. and He, D., Yunnan’s fastpaced large hydropower development: a powershed-based approach to critically assessing generation and consumption paradigms. Water, 2016, 8, 476.

  • Allouche, J., Middleton, C. and Gyawali, D., Technical veil, hidden politics: interrogating the power linkages behind the nexus. Water Altern., 2015, 8, 610–626.

  • Biba, S., The goals and reality of the water–food–energy security nexus: the case of China and its southern neighbours. Third World Q., 2015, 37, 51–70.

  • Gain, A. K., Giupponi, C. and Benson, D., The water–energy–food (WEF) security nexus: the policy perspective of Bangladesh. Water Int., 2015, 40, 895–910.

  • Beck, M. B. and Walker, R. V., On water security, sustainability, and the water–food–energy–climate nexus. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2013, 7, 626–639.

  • Karabulut, A. et al., Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem–water–food–energy nexus in the danube river basin. Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, 17, 278–292.

  • Endo, A. et al., Methods of the water–energy–food nexus. Water, 2015, 7, 5806–5830.

  • Wicaksono, A., Jeong, G. and Kang, D., Water, energy, and food nexus: review of global implementation and simulation model development. Water Policy, 2017, wp2017214.

  • Albrecht, T. R., Cischolar_mainof, A. and Scott, C. A., The water–energy– food nexus: a systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ. Res. Lett., 2018, 13, 043002.

  • Mccornick, P. G., Awulachew, S. B., Abebe, M. and Priscoli, J. D., Water–food–energy–environment synergies and tradeoffs: major issues and case studies. Water Policy, 2008, 10, 23–36.

  • Guillaume, J. H. A., Kummu, M., Eisner, S. and Varis, O., Transferable principles for managing the nexus & 58; lessons from historical global water modelling of central Asia. Water, 2015, 7, 4200–4231.


Abstract Views: 354

PDF Views: 119




  • Recent Progress on the Water–Energy–Food Nexus using Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract Views: 354  |  PDF Views: 119

Authors

Dan Chen
College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Peng Zhang
College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Zhaohui Luo
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Di Zhang
College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Bo Bi
College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Xinchun Cao
College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Abstract


A systematic overview of the water–energy–food nexus studies is presented using bibliometric analysis. We have used the Web of Science Core Collection data from 2010 to 2017 for the same. The main subject categories include environmental science and water resources. Water and Environmental Science & Policy are two typical journals. USA, England and Germany are productive countries, while the main institutions are Oxford University, International Water Management Institute, and International Food Policy Research Institute. The frequently cited papers and keywords revealed the research hotspots and trends, with the major concerns of the concept and mechanism, research dimensions and nexus methodologies.

Keywords


Bibliometric Analysis, Recent Progress, Systematic Overview, Water–Energy–Food Nexus.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi4%2F577-586