Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Adsorption of Arsenic using Low Cost Adsorbents:Guava Leaf Biomass, Mango Bark and Bagasse


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221 005, India
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Lucknow 226 021, India
 

Adsorbents prepared from inexpensive materials of guava leaf biomass, mango bark and bagasse were studied for As(III) removal from the aqueous solution. The effects of pH, contact time, initial As(III) concentration and adsorbent dosage on the adsorption of As(III) were studied using batch experiments. Adsorption process was also verified with Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Redlich–Peterson models. Langmuir isotherm fitted best in the experimental data. Application of Langmuir isotherm to the system yielded the maximum capacities of 1.35 mg g–1, 1.25 mg g–1 and 1.05 mg g–1 for bagasse, mango bark and guava leaf biomass respectively, in the range of As(III) concentration as 10–140 mg l–1. The dimensionless equilibrium parameter, RL, signifies favourable adsorption of As(III) on all adsorbents and was observed to be in the range of 0.029–0.294, 0.021– 0.235 and 0.021–0.234, for bagasse, mango bark and guava leaf biomass respectively (0 < RL < 1). The adsorption process was observed to follow pseudosecond- order kinetic model.

Keywords

Adsorption, Arsenite Ion-As(III), Isotherms, Kinetics, Low-Cost Adsorbents.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Shukla, N. K., Markandeya and Shukla, V. K., Arsenic and physicochemical calamity in the ground water samples of Ballia district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Iranica J. Energy Environ., 2015, 6(4), 328–333.

  • Choong, Y. S. T., Chuah, G. T., Robia, H. Y., Koay, L. F. G. and Azni, I., Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination, 2007, 217, 139–166.

  • Shevade, S. and Ford, R., Use of synthetic zeolites for arsenate removal from pollutant water. Water Res., 2004, 38, 3197– 3204.

  • Mandal, B. K. and Suzuki, K. T., Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta, 2002, 58, 201–235.

  • USEPA, Arsenic occurrence in public drinking water supplies. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2007, EPA815-R-00-023, pp. 1–156.

  • Mohan, D. and Charles, P., Arsenic removal from water/ wastewater using adsorbents – a critical review. J. Hazard. Mater., 2007, 142(1–2), 1–53.

  • Rahman, M. M. et al., Effectiveness and reliability of arsenic field testing kits: are the million dollar screening projects effective or not. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36(24), 5385–5394.

  • Natale, F. D., Erto, A., Lancia, A. and Musmarra, D., Experimental and modeling analysis of As(V) ions adsorption on granular activated carbon. Water Res., 2008, 42, 2007–2016.

  • Peggy, A. O., Chemistry and mineralogy of arsenic. Elements, 2006, 2(2), 77–83. doi:10.2113/gselements.2.2.77.

  • WHO, Arsenic compounds, environmental health criteria 224. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2nd edn, 2001.

  • USEPA, Federal Register, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2001, 66(14), 6976–7066.

  • Leupin, O. X. and Hug, S. J., Oxidation and removal of arsenic( III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron. Water Resour., 2005, 39(9), 1729–1740.

  • Wickramasinghe, S. R., Han, B., Zimbron, J., Shen, Z. and Karim, M. N., Arsenic removal by coagulation and filtration: comparison of groundwater from the United States and Bangladesh. Desalination, 2004, 169(3), 231–244; doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00530-2.

  • Kim, J. and Benjamin, M. M., Modeling a novel ion exchange process for arsenic and nitrate removal. Water Res., 2004, 38(8), 2053–2062; doi:10.1016/j.

  • Weng, Y. H., Chaung-Hsieh, L. H., Lee, H. H., Li, K. C. and Huang, C. P., Removal of arsenic and humic substances (HSs) by electro-ultrafiltration (EUF). J. Hazard. Mater., 2005, 122(1–2), 171–176; doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.001.

  • Jain, C. K. and Singh, R. D., Technological options for the removal of arsenic with special reference to South East Asia: review. J. Environ. Manage., 2012, 107, 1–18.

  • Sud, D., Mahajan, G. and Kaur, M. P., Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions: a review. Bioresour. Technol., 2008, 99, 6017– 6027; doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.064.

  • Tiwari, M., Shukla, S. P., Mohan, D., Bhargava, D. S. and Kisku, G. C., Modified cenospheres as an adsorbent for the removal of disperse dyes. Adv. Environ. Chem., 2015, 2015, 1–8.

  • Qaiser, S., Saleemi, A. R. and Ahmad, M. M., Heavy metal uptake by agro based waste materials. Environ. Biotechnol., 2007, 10, 409–416.

  • Mohan, D. et al., Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. J. Colloid Interface. Sci., 2007, 310(1), 57–73.

  • Wang, J. and Chen, C., Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future: review. Biotechnol. Adv., 2009, 27, 195–226.

  • Babu, B. V. and Gupta, S., Adsorption of Cr(VI) using activated neem leaves: kinetic study. Adsorption, 2008, 13, 85–92.

  • Montagnaro, F. and Santoro, L., Reuse of coal combustion ashes as dyes and heavy metal adsorbents: effect of sieving and demineralization on waste properties and adsorption capacity. Chem. Eng. J., 2009, 150, 174–180.

  • Wang, S., Boyjoo, Y., Choueib, A. and Zhu, Z. H., Removal of dyes from aqueous solution using fly ash and red mud. Water Res., 2005, 39, 129–138.

  • APHA, Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, 22nd edn, 2012.

  • Singh, T. S. and Pant, K. K., Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of As(III) on activated alumina. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2004, 36, 139–147.

  • Vaishya, R. C. and Gupta, S. K., Modeling arsenic(V) removal from water by sulfate modified iron-oxide coated sand (SMIOCS). J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2002, 78, 73–80.

  • Jeong, Y., Maohong, F., Leeuwen, J. V. and Belczyk, J. F., Effect of competing solutes on arsenic(V) adsorption using iron and aluminum oxides. J. Environ. Sci., 2007, 19, 910–919.

  • Tamas, M. J., Sharma, S. K., Ibstedt, S., Jacobson, T. and Christen, P., Heavy metals and metalloids as a cause for protein misfolding and aggregation. Biomolecules, 2014, 4, 252–267.

  • Salman, M., Athar, M., Shafique, M., Din, M. I., Rehman, R., Akram, A. and Ali, S. Z., Adsorption modeling of alizarin yellow on untreated and treated charcoal. Turkish J. Eng. Environ. Sci., 2011, 35, 209–216; doi:10.3906/muh-1009-32.

  • Carabante, I., Grahn, M., Holmgren, A., Kumpiene, A. and Hedlund, J., Adsorption of As(V) on oxide nanoparticle films studied by in situ ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2009, 346, 106–113.

  • Katsoyiannis, I. A. and Zouboulis, A. I., Application of biological processes for the removal of arsenic from ground waters. Water Res., 2004, 38, 17–26; doi:10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.011.

  • Shipley, H. J., Yean, S., Kan, A. T. and Tomson, M. B., Adsorption of arsenic to magnetite nanoparticles: effect of particle concentration, pH, ionic strength, and temperature. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 2009, 28(3), 509–515.

  • Markandeya, et al., Adsorptive capacity of sawdust for the adsorption of MB dye and designing of two-stage batch adsorber. Cogent Environ. Sci., 2015, 1(1), 1075856.

  • Shukla, S. P., Sonam, Markandeya, Mohan, D. and Pandey, G., Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution using Psidium guajava leaves. Desalin. Water Treat., 2017, 62, 418–425.

  • Langmuir, I., The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1916, 40, 1361–1403.

  • Freundlich, H. Z., Over the adsorption in solution. J. Phys. Chem., 1906, 57, 385–470.

  • Temkin, M. J. and Pyzhev, V., Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalysts. Acta Physiochim. URRS, 1940, 12, 217– 222.

  • Redlich, O. and Peterson, D. L., A useful adsorption isotherm. J. Phys. Chem., 1959, 63, 1024–1029.

  • Markandeya, Dhiman, N., Shukla, S. P. and Kisku, G. C., Statistical optimization of process parameters for removal of dyes from wastewater on chitosan cenospheres nanocomposite using response surface methodology. J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 149, 597–606.

  • Markandeya, Shukla, S. P. and Dhiman, N., Characterization and adsorption of disperse dyes from wastewater onto cenospheres activated carbon composites. Environ. Earth Sci., 2017, 76, 702– 714.

  • Markandeya, Shukla, S. P., Dhiman, N., Mohan, D., Kisku, G. C. and Roy, S., An efficient removal of disperse dye from wastewater using zeolite synthesized from cenospheres. J. Hazard., Toxic, Radio. Waste, 2017, 21(4), 04017017.

  • Markandeya, Shukla, S. P. and Mohan, D., Toxicity of disperse dyes and its removal from wastewater using various adsorbents: a review. Res. J. Environ. Toxicol., 2017, 9, 1–18.

  • Weber, W. J., Matcalf, R. L. and Pitts, J. N., Adsorption in Physicochemical Process for Water Quality Control, Wiley Intersci., New York, 1972, pp. 199–259.

  • Mamy, L. and Barriuso, E., Desorption and time-dependent sorption of herbicides in soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2006, 58, 174–187.

  • Feng-Chin, W., Bing-Lan, L., Keng-Tung, W. and Ru-Ling, T., A new linear form analysis of Redlich–Peterson isotherm equation for the adsorptions of dyes. Chem. Eng. J., 2010, 162, 21–27.

  • Kisku, G. C., Markandeya, Shukla, S. P., Singh, D. S. and Murthy, R. C., Characterization and adsorptive capacity of coal fly ash from aqueous solutions of disperse blue and disperse orange dyes. Environ. Earth Sci., 2015, 74(2), 1125–1135.

  • Tiwari, M., Shukla, S. P., Bhargava, D. S. and Kisku, G. C., Color removal potential of coal fly ash-a low cost adsorbent from aqueous solutions of disperse dyes used in textile mill through batch technique. Our Earth, 2013, 10(4), 5–8.

  • Markandeya, Dhiman, N., Shukla, S. P., Mohan, D., Kisku, G. C. and Patnaik, S., Comprehensive remediation study of disperse dyes containing wastewater by using environmental benign, low cost cenospheres nanosyntactic foam. J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 182, 206–216.

  • Markandeya, Shukla, S. P. and Kisku, G. C., Linear and non-linear kinetic modeling for the adsorption of disperse dye in a batch process. Res. J. Environ. Toxicol., 2015, 9(6), 320–331.

  • Chien, S. H. and Clayton, W. R., Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1980, 44(2), 265–268.

  • Weber, W. J. and Morris, J. C., Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J. Sanit. Eng. Div., 1963, 89, 31–60.

  • Shukla, S. P. et al., Minimization of contact time for two-stage batch adsorber design using second-order kinetic model for adsorption of methylene blue (MB) on used tea leaves. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res., 2014, 2(1), 58–66.

  • Bhargava, D. S. and Bhatt, D. J., Model for moving media reactor performance. J. Environ. Eng., 1985, 111(5), 618–633.


Abstract Views: 3346

PDF Views: 117




  • Adsorption of Arsenic using Low Cost Adsorbents:Guava Leaf Biomass, Mango Bark and Bagasse

Abstract Views: 3346  |  PDF Views: 117

Authors

Devendra Mohan
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221 005, India
Markandeya
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221 005, India
S. Dey
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221 005, India
S. B. Dwivedi
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221 005, India
S. P. Shukla
Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Lucknow 226 021, India

Abstract


Adsorbents prepared from inexpensive materials of guava leaf biomass, mango bark and bagasse were studied for As(III) removal from the aqueous solution. The effects of pH, contact time, initial As(III) concentration and adsorbent dosage on the adsorption of As(III) were studied using batch experiments. Adsorption process was also verified with Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Redlich–Peterson models. Langmuir isotherm fitted best in the experimental data. Application of Langmuir isotherm to the system yielded the maximum capacities of 1.35 mg g–1, 1.25 mg g–1 and 1.05 mg g–1 for bagasse, mango bark and guava leaf biomass respectively, in the range of As(III) concentration as 10–140 mg l–1. The dimensionless equilibrium parameter, RL, signifies favourable adsorption of As(III) on all adsorbents and was observed to be in the range of 0.029–0.294, 0.021– 0.235 and 0.021–0.234, for bagasse, mango bark and guava leaf biomass respectively (0 < RL < 1). The adsorption process was observed to follow pseudosecond- order kinetic model.

Keywords


Adsorption, Arsenite Ion-As(III), Isotherms, Kinetics, Low-Cost Adsorbents.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi4%2F649-661