Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scientists, Citizens and Goods


Affiliations
1 Istituto Italiano di Antropologia, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, Italy
2 Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, Italy
 

The social utility of science deals with the need of breaking down some barriers separating the scientific community and society. Both are involved in the relationships among science, democracy and goods. It is a recent phenomenon linked to the advent of the World Wide Web, which has led to a huge explosion in the availability of information. Many companies are now involved in this revolution and are aware of the importance of the sharing culture. Conversely, the academic world travels at a slower pace, despite the widespread awareness of the importance of accessibility to research products for scientific progress.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Hagendijk, R., In Science and Democracy: Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond (eds. Hilgartner, S., Miller, C. and Hagendijk, R.), Routledge, London, UK, 2015, pp. 220–238.

  • Jasanoff, S., Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 2005.

  • Tallacchini, M., In Etica della ricerca biologica (ed. Mazzoni, C.), Olschki, Firenze, Italy, 2000, pp. 91–111.

  • Kennedy, D., A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 2016.

  • Destro Bisol, G., Anagnostou, P. and Capocasa, M., Sci. Soc., 2014, 17–18, 1– 15.

  • Greco, P., Sci. Soc., 2014, 17–18, VII– XII.

  • Fecher, B. and Friesike, S., In Opening Science (eds Bartling, S. and Friesike, S.), Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2014, pp. 17–47.

  • Bardhi, F. and Eckhardt, G. M., J. Consum. Res., 2012, 39, 881–898.

  • Botsman, R. and Rogers, R., What’s Mine is Yours: the Rise of Collaborative Consumption, Harper Collins, New York, USA, 2010.

  • Lamberton, C. and Randall, R., J. Market., 2012, 76, 109–125.

  • Carrol, E. and Romano, J., Your Digital Afterlife: When Facebook, Flickr and Twitter are Your Estate, What’s Your Legacy? New Riders, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2011.

  • Rufo, F., Bioetica, 2016, 24, 251–266.

  • Ozanne, L. and Ballantine, P., J. Consum. Behav., 2010, 9, 485–498.

  • Anagnostou, P., Capocasa, M., Milia, N., Sanna, E., Battaggia, C., Luzi, D. and Destro Bisol, G., PLoS ONE, 2015, 10, e0121409.

  • Capocasa, M. et al., MapPapers, 2013, 4, 37–38.

  • Destro Bisol, G. et al., J. Anthropol. Sci., 2014, 92, 179–200.

  • Le Cabec, A. and Toussaint, M., J. Anthropol. Sci., 2017, 95, 7–34.

  • Belk, R., J. Bus. Res., 2014, 67, 1595– 1600.


Abstract Views: 410

PDF Views: 132




  • Scientists, Citizens and Goods

Abstract Views: 410  |  PDF Views: 132

Authors

Marco Capocasa
Istituto Italiano di Antropologia, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, Italy
Fabrizio Rufo
Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, Italy

Abstract


The social utility of science deals with the need of breaking down some barriers separating the scientific community and society. Both are involved in the relationships among science, democracy and goods. It is a recent phenomenon linked to the advent of the World Wide Web, which has led to a huge explosion in the availability of information. Many companies are now involved in this revolution and are aware of the importance of the sharing culture. Conversely, the academic world travels at a slower pace, despite the widespread awareness of the importance of accessibility to research products for scientific progress.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi5%2F737-738