Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Study of Wheat Varieties under Open Farming and Poplar-Based Agroforestry System in Uttarakhand, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, Ranchi Agriculture College, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi 834 006, India
2 Department of GPB, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263 145, India
3 Department of SAF, Faculty of Forestry, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi 834 006, India
4 Institute of Forest Productivity, Ranchi 835 303, India
 

A field experiment on wheat varieties was carried out at Agroforestry Research Centre, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. The experimental plots were laid out in randomized block design with two associate farming systems, open farming and poplar-based agroforestry system, and four varieties of wheat, viz. PBW-373, PBW-343, UP-262 and VL-907, with three replications. The average tree growth parameters, viz. plant height, diameter and crown width of poplar showed an increase at the rate of 8.43%, 12.36% and 17.91% respectively. Growth and yield attributes of wheat like germination count, leaf area index, plant height, dry matter accumulation, as well as yield of wheat were found higher in open farming compared to poplar-based agroforestry system. The yield characters of wheat, such as biological yield (112.01 q ha–1), grain yield (42.19 q ha–1), straw yield (69.93 q ha–1) and harvest index (39.82) were recorded maximum in VL-907 followed by PBW- 343, except for straw yield. Among soil chemical properties, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, and available NPK were higher, whereas pH was lower under poplar-based agroforestry system compared to open farming system. Above-ground, below-ground and total biomass, carbon stock and carbon sequestration were significantly higher in agroforestry system (130.42, 17.75, 148.17, 65.20 and 239.27 q ha–1 respectively) compared to open farming.

Keywords

Agroforestry, Biomass, Carbon Sequestration, Intercropping, Wheat Varieties.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Johl, S. S., Singh, S., Dev, D. S., Nijjar, G. S., Sindhu, A. S. and Grewal, S. S., Report of the expert committee on diversification of agriculture in Punjab, submitted to the Government of Punjab, 1986, p. 165.

  • Garrity, D. P., Agroforestry and the achievement of the millenium development goals. Agrofor. Syst., 2004, 61, 5–17.

  • Sarvade, S., Mishra, H. S., Kaushal, R., Chaturvedi, S., Tewari, S. and Jadhav, T. A., Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop under different spacings of trees and fertility levels. .Afr. J. Agric. Res., 2014, 9(9), 866–873.

  • Indian State of Forest Report (ISFR), Forest Survey of India, Ministry for Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, 2013, p. 73.

  • Singh, B. and Sharma, K. N., Tree growth and nutrient status of soil in a poplar (Populus deltoids Bartr.) based agroforestry system in Punjab, India. Agrofor. Syst., 2007, 70, 125–134.

  • Chauhan, S. K., Brar, M. S. and Sharma, R., Performance of poplar (Populus deltoids bartr.) and its effect on wheat yield under agroforestry system in irrigated agro-ecosystem, India. Caspian J. Environ. Sci., 2012, 10(1), 53–60.

  • Gupta, M. K. and Sharma, S. D., Effect of tree plantation on soil properties, profile morphology and productivity index: poplar in Yamunanagar district of Hariyana. Ann. For., 2009, 17(1), 43–70.

  • Nandal, D. P. S. and Dhillon, A., Allelopathic effect of poplar (Populus deltoids Bartr. ex Marsh): an assessment on the response of wheat varieties under laboratory and field conditions. Indian J. Agrofor., 2013, 9, 125–127.

  • Jain, S. K. and Singh, P., Performance of intercrops in agroforestry system: the case of poplar (Populus deltoides) in Uttar Pradesh (India). Indian For., 1999, 125, 195–205.

  • Kareemulla, K., Rizvi, R. H., Kumar, K., Dwivedi, R. P. and Singh, R., Poplar agroforestry systems of western Uttar Pradesh in northern India: a socioeconomic analysis. For., Trees Livelihood, 2005, 15, 375–381.

  • Prakash, O., Dubey, R. P., Dubey, S. K. and Deshwal, J. S., Evaluation of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk) based agrihorti systems under various tree ischolar_main management practices on reclaimed Yamuna ravines. Indian J. Soil Conserv., 2011, 39(1), 59–62.

  • Chauhan, S. K., Sharma, R., Sharma, S. C., Gupta, N. and Ritu, Evaluation of poplar (Populus deltoids Bartr. ex Marsh.) boundary plantation based agri-silvicultural system for wheat–paddy yield and carbon storage. Int. J. Agric. For., 2012, 2(5), 239–246.

  • Dhanda, R. S. and Verma, R. K., Timber volume and weight tables of farm grown poplar (Populus deltoids Bartr. ex Marsh.) in Punjab. Indian For., 2001, 127, 115–130.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF Sector, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.

  • Sharma, S. C., Dogra, A. S., Upadhayay, A. and Chahal, G. S., Carbon stock and productivity assessment of Populus deltoids Bartr. ex Marsh in Punjab. Indian For., 2007, 133, 8–16.

  • Chauhan, S. K., Nanda, R. K. and Brar, M. S., Adoption of poplar based agroforestry as an approach for diversified agriculture in Punjab. Indian For., 2009 135(5), 671–677.

  • Sharma, N. K., Samra, J. S. and Dadhwal, K. S., Effect of poplar leaves incorporation on growth and yield of wheat in relation to fertilizer application. Indian For., 2005, 131, 563–572.

  • Dhillon, G. P. S., Dhanda, R. S. and Dhillon, M. S., Performance of wheat under scattered trees of kikar (Acacia nilotica) under rainfed condition in Punjab (India). Indian For., 1998, 124(1), 48–53.

  • Kumar, M., Lakiang, J. J. and Singh, S., Tree–crop interactions in the agroforestry systems of Mizoram. J. Trop. For. Sci., 2008, 20(2), 91–98.

  • Uniyal, A. K. and Chhetri, S., An assessment of phytotoxic potential of promising agroforestry trees on germination and growth pattern of traditional field crops of Sikkim Himalaya, India. Am. Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 2010, 9(1), 70–78.

  • Sathaye, J. A. and Ravindernath, N. H., Climate change mitigation in the energy and forestry sectors of developing countries. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 1998, 23, 387–437.


Abstract Views: 399

PDF Views: 144




  • Comparative Study of Wheat Varieties under Open Farming and Poplar-Based Agroforestry System in Uttarakhand, India

Abstract Views: 399  |  PDF Views: 144

Authors

Abhay Kumar
Department of Agronomy, Ranchi Agriculture College, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi 834 006, India
Virendra Singh
Department of GPB, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263 145, India
Swati Shabnam
Department of Agronomy, Ranchi Agriculture College, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi 834 006, India
P. R. Oraon
Department of SAF, Faculty of Forestry, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi 834 006, India
Sunita Kumari
Institute of Forest Productivity, Ranchi 835 303, India

Abstract


A field experiment on wheat varieties was carried out at Agroforestry Research Centre, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. The experimental plots were laid out in randomized block design with two associate farming systems, open farming and poplar-based agroforestry system, and four varieties of wheat, viz. PBW-373, PBW-343, UP-262 and VL-907, with three replications. The average tree growth parameters, viz. plant height, diameter and crown width of poplar showed an increase at the rate of 8.43%, 12.36% and 17.91% respectively. Growth and yield attributes of wheat like germination count, leaf area index, plant height, dry matter accumulation, as well as yield of wheat were found higher in open farming compared to poplar-based agroforestry system. The yield characters of wheat, such as biological yield (112.01 q ha–1), grain yield (42.19 q ha–1), straw yield (69.93 q ha–1) and harvest index (39.82) were recorded maximum in VL-907 followed by PBW- 343, except for straw yield. Among soil chemical properties, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, and available NPK were higher, whereas pH was lower under poplar-based agroforestry system compared to open farming system. Above-ground, below-ground and total biomass, carbon stock and carbon sequestration were significantly higher in agroforestry system (130.42, 17.75, 148.17, 65.20 and 239.27 q ha–1 respectively) compared to open farming.

Keywords


Agroforestry, Biomass, Carbon Sequestration, Intercropping, Wheat Varieties.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi6%2F1054-1059