Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Confined Masonry Construction for India:A Techno Economical Solution for Improved Seismic Behaviour


Affiliations
1 Structural Engineering Division, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, India
 

Masonry constructions are the pervasive building stock in India. However, such constructions suffer widespread damage even at moderate ground shaking due to non-engineered construction. Alternatively, confined masonry shows better promise as a technology that has performed satisfactorily during past earthquakes worldwide. Present article outlines scenario of masonry construction in India, performance of confined masonry in past earthquakes and studies on confined masonry worldwide. The article also encompasses experimental seismic performance of full-scale models of unreinforced masonry (URM), reinforced masonry (RM) and confined masonry (CM) buildings in Indian context under quasi-static reversed cyclic lateral loading in terms of damage pattern, lateral strength, drift and stiffness. The cost analysis of URM, RM, CM and reinforced concrete (RC) residential buildings for a set of 20 samples in seismic Zone IV, keeping uniform input parameters, showed cost reduction in CM buildings when compared to RC buildings.

Keywords

Confined Masonry, Construction Cost, Reinforced Masonry, Seismic Performance, Unreinforced Masonry.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi, 2001.

  • Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi, 2011.

  • National Building Code, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2005.

  • Brzev, S., Earthquake-Resistant Confined Masonry Construction, National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering, Kanpur, India, 2008.

  • Schacher, T., Confined Masonry for One and Two Storey Buildings in Low-Tech Environments – A Guidebook for Technicians and Artisans, National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering, Kanpur, India, 2009.

  • Murty, C. V. R. et al., Build a safe house with confined masonry. Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India, 2013.

  • Jain, S. K., Brzev, S., Bhargava, L. K., Basu, D., Ghosh, I., Rai, D. C. and Ghaisas, K. V., Confined masonry for residential construction, Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, 2015.

  • Taucer, F., Alarcon, J. E. and So, E., August 15 magnitude 7.9 earthquake near the coast of Central Peru: analysis and field mission report. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2009, 7(1), 1–70.

  • Yoshimura, K. and Kuroki, M., Damage to masonry buildings caused by the El Salvador earthquake of 13 January 2001. J. Nat. Disast. Sci., 2001, 23(2), 53–63.

  • Klingner, R. E., Behavior of masonry in the Northridge (US) and Tecomán–Colima (Mexico) earthquakes: Lessons learned, and changes in US design provisions. Constr. Build. Mater., 2006, 20(4), 209–219.

  • Singh, S. K. et al., A preliminary report on the Tehuacan, Mexico earthquake of 15 June 1999 (Mw = 7.0). Seismol. Res. Lett., 1999, 70(5), 489–504.

  • Elnashai, A. S., Alva-Hurtado, J., Pineda, O., Kwon, O. S., MoranYanez, L., Huaco, G. and Pluta, G., The Pisco-Chincha Earthquake of 15 August 2007, MAE Center Report No. 08-01, MidAmerica Earthquake Center, Illinois, USA, November 2008.

  • Moroni, M. O., Astroza, M. and Acevedo, C., Performance and seismic vulnerability of masonry housing types used in Chile. J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 2004, 18(3), 173–179.

  • Tomazevic, M., Seismic design of masonry structures. Struct. Eng. Mater., 1997, 1(1), 88–95.

  • Tomazevic, M., Some aspect of experimental testing of seismic behaviour of masonry walls and models of masonry buildings. ISET J. Earthq. Technol., 2000, 37(4), 101–117.

  • Tomazevic, M., Bosiljkov, V. and Weiss, P., Structural behaviour factor for masonry structures. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, Paper no. 2642, 2004.

  • Tomazevic, M., Damage as a measure for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structures: Slovenian experience. Can. J. Civil Eng., 2007, 34, 1403–1412.

  • Tomazevic, M., Shear resistance of masonry walls and Eurocode 6: shear versus tensile strength of masonry. Mater. Struct., 2009, 42, 889–907.

  • Wijaya, W., Kusumastuti, D., Suarjana, M., Rildova and Pribadi, K., Experimental study on wall-frame connection of confined masonry wall. In Proceedings of the 12th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering, Hong Kong, 2011, pp. 2094– 2102.

  • Gouveia, J. P. and Lourenco, P. B., Masonry shear walls subjected to cyclic loading: influence of confinement and horizontal reinforcement. In Proceedings of the 10th North American Masonry Conference, Missouri, USA, Paper no. 14, 2007, pp. 2094–2102.

  • Yoshimura, K., Kikuchi, K., Okamoto, T. and Sanchez, T., Effect of vertical and horizontal wall reinforcement on seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Mexico, Paper no. 191, 1996.

  • Yoshimura, K., Kikuchi, K., Kuroki, M., Liu, L. and Ma, L., Effect of wall reinforcements applied lateral force and vertical axial loads on seismic behaviour of confined concrete masonry walls. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Aukland, New Zealand, Paper no. 0984, 2000.

  • Yoshimura, K. et al., Experimental study on reinforcing methods for confined masonry walls subjected to seismic forces. In Proceedings of the 9th North American Masonry Conference, South Carolina, USA, 2003.

  • Yoshimura, K., Kikuchi, K., Kuroki, M., Nonaka, H., Kim, K. T., Wangdi, R. and Oshikata, A., Experimental study for developing higher seismic performance of brick masonry walls. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, Paper no. 1597, 2004.

  • Zabala, F., Bustos, J. L., Masanet, A. and Santalucia, J., Experimental behaviour of masonry structural walls used in Argentina. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, Paper no. 1093, 2004.

  • Yanez, F., Astroza, M., Holmberg, A. and Ogaz, O., Behaviour of confined masonry shear walls with large openings. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, Paper no. 3438, 2004.

  • Marinilli, A. and Castilla, E., Experimental evaluation of confined masonry walls with several confining-columns. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, Paper no. 2129, 2004.

  • Kumazawa, F. and Ohkubo, M., Non-linear characteristics of confined masonry walls with lateral reinforcement in mortar joints. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Aukland, New Zealand, Paper no. 0743, 2000.

  • Aguilar, G., Meli, R., Diaz, R. and Vazquez-Del-Mercado, R., Influence of horizontal reinforcement on the behaviour of confined masonry walls. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Mexico, Paper no. 1380, 1996.

  • Meli, R., Behaviour of masonry walls under lateral loads. In Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Paper no. 101a, 1974.

  • Umek, A., Resistance of comparison between unreinforced walls, walls with vertical linkages, and reinforced walls. J. Grad. Vest., Ljubljana, 1971, 10, 241–248.

  • Tomazevic, M., Lutman, M. and Petkovic, L., Seismic behaviour of masonry walls: experimental simulation. J. Struct. Eng., 1996, 122(9), 1040–1047.

  • Kazemi, M. T., Asl, M. H., Bakhshi, A. and Rofooei, F. R., Shaking table study of a full-scale single storey confined brick masonry building. Sci. Iran. Trans. A – Civil Eng., 2010, 17(3), 184.

  • Agarwal, S. K., Chourasia, A. and Parashar, J., Performance evaluation of seismic resisting and retrofitting measures for full-scale brick masonry building under earthquake loads. J. Struct. Eng., 2007, 34(1), 56–62.

  • Chourasia, A., Bhattacharyya, S. K., Bhargava, P. and Bhandari, N. M., Influential aspects on seismic performance of confined masonry construction. Nat. Sci., 2013, 5(8A1), 56–62.

  • Chourasia, A., Bhattacharyya, S. K., Bhandari, N. M. and Bhargava, P., Seismic performance of full-scale brick masonry buildings. Ninth International Masonry Conference, Guimaraes, Portugal, 2014.

  • IS 1905-2002, Code of Practice for Structural use of Unreinforced Masonry. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  • IS 4326-2013, Criteria of Practice for Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  • European Committee for Standardization. EN 1996-1-1:2005. In Eurocode 6- Design of masonry structures. Part 1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures, 2005.

  • IS 456-2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  • IS 1893-2002, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  • IS 13920-1993, Ductility Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces – Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.


Abstract Views: 538

PDF Views: 129




  • Confined Masonry Construction for India:A Techno Economical Solution for Improved Seismic Behaviour

Abstract Views: 538  |  PDF Views: 129

Authors

Ajay Chourasia
Structural Engineering Division, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, India
Jalaj Parashar
Structural Engineering Division, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, India
Shubham Singhal
Structural Engineering Division, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, India

Abstract


Masonry constructions are the pervasive building stock in India. However, such constructions suffer widespread damage even at moderate ground shaking due to non-engineered construction. Alternatively, confined masonry shows better promise as a technology that has performed satisfactorily during past earthquakes worldwide. Present article outlines scenario of masonry construction in India, performance of confined masonry in past earthquakes and studies on confined masonry worldwide. The article also encompasses experimental seismic performance of full-scale models of unreinforced masonry (URM), reinforced masonry (RM) and confined masonry (CM) buildings in Indian context under quasi-static reversed cyclic lateral loading in terms of damage pattern, lateral strength, drift and stiffness. The cost analysis of URM, RM, CM and reinforced concrete (RC) residential buildings for a set of 20 samples in seismic Zone IV, keeping uniform input parameters, showed cost reduction in CM buildings when compared to RC buildings.

Keywords


Confined Masonry, Construction Cost, Reinforced Masonry, Seismic Performance, Unreinforced Masonry.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi7%2F1174-1183