Open Access
Subscription Access
Finite Element-Based Simulation and Analysis of Dragline Bucket in Static and Dynamic Loading Condition
Draglines are bulky and expensive machines widely utilized in opencast mines for overburden stripping. Due to tedious working conditions, a variety of fatigue failures in dragline components are common. Bucket is one of the main components of dragline, and it is a source of external load on the machinery than its interaction through broken rock material directly. Hence, dragline buckets are the most vulnerable components of wear, tear and related failures. This article analyses the von Mises stresses using the finite element method (FEM) under the static and dynamic loading conditions. In this study, the three-dimensional solid bucket models were developed in AUTO CAD and were investigated for stress, deformation, and safety factor on the dragline bucket under static and dynamic loading conditions using the ANSYS 18 software. FEM outcomes have been highlighted from teeth, the arc of anchors and hitch elements have a maximum value of stress and a minimum value of safety factor under various loading conditions. The purpose of this study was to prognosticate the bucket failure, the strength of bucket teeth and identify the sensitive areas of the dragline bucket.
Keywords
Dragline Bucket, Loading Conditions, Static and Dynamic.
User
Font Size
Information
- Azam, S. F. and Rai, P., Modelling of dragline bucket for determination of stress. ASME J., 2018, 78, 392–402.
- Golbasi, O. and Demirel, N., Investigation of stress in an earthmover bucket using finite element analysis: A generic model for draglines. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 2015, 115(7), 623–628.
- Abo-Elnor, M., Hamilton, R. and Boyle, J. T., Simulation of soil– blade interaction for sandy soil using advanced 3D finite element analysis. Soil Till. Res., 2004, 75(1), 61–73.
- Costello, M. and Kyle, J., A method for calculating static conditions of a dragline excavation system using dynamic simulation. Math. Comput. Model., 2004, 40(3–4).
- Coetzee, C. J. and Els, D. N. J., The numerical modelling of excavator bucket filling using DEM. J. Terramechanics, 2009, 46(5), 217–227.
- Coetzee, C. J., Els, D. N. J. and Dymond, G. F., Discrete element parameter calibration and the modelling of dragline bucket filling. J. Terramechanics, 2010, 47(1), 33–44.
- Bende, S. B. and Awate, N. P., Design, modeling and analysis of excavator arm. Int. J. Design Manuf. Technol., 2013, 4, 14–20.
- Tupkar, M. P. and Zaveri, S. R., Design and analysis of an excavator bucket. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Technol., 2015, 4(3), 227– 229.
- Ozdogan, M. and Machinery, I., Walking dragline bucket penetration mechanism and penetration forces, 2015; https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2304.8406.
- Abo-Elnor, M., Hamilton, R. and Boyle, J. T., 3D Dynamic analysis of soil-tool interaction using the finite element method. J. Terramechanics, 2003, 40(1), 51–62.
- McKyes, E. (ed.), Soil Cutting and Tillage, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985, p. 7.
- Hettiaratchi, D. R. P. and Reece, A. R., The calculation of passive soil resistance. Geotechnique, 1974, 24(3), 289–310.
- Mouazen, A. M. and Neményi, M., Finite element analysis of subsoiler cutting in non-homogeneous sandy loam soil. Soil Till. Res., 1999, 51(1–2), 1–15.
Abstract Views: 318
PDF Views: 134