Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Ecosystem Services Approach for Revitalizing Agriculture in India


Affiliations
1 M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai 600 113, India
2 Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai 600 020, India
3 Goa University, Goa 403 206, India
4 Bhim Rao Ambedkar College, Delhi University, Delhi 110 094, India
 

Agricultural landscapes referred to as ‘agro-ecosystems’ provide both marketable and non-marketable ecosystem services. The ability of agro-ecosystems to provide ecosystem services is limited by the nature of production systems and production method. Promotion of input-intensive production systems results in short-term productivity gains along with long-term ecological and environmental losses. India’s agriculture suffers from various ecological problems such as soil pollution, overexploitation of groundwater and loss of biodiversity. Policy measures aimed at improving agriculture should shift from a purely ‘productivity enhancement’ objective towards promotion of ecologically sustainable pro-environmental agricultural production (PAP) practices to realize the goal of ‘productivity in perpetuity’. This article examines the feasibility of ‘nudges and incentives’ in payment for ecosystem services/agri-environmental schemes (PES/AES) type schemes in India which could be a possible policy solution. It could nudge farmers to PAP practices and would be fiscally feasible even for individual states to adopt in a federal system of governance.

Keywords

Agro-Ecosystems, Evergreen Revolution, Payment For Ecosystem Services, Pro-Environmental Agricultural Production.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Tilman, D. et al., Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 2001, 292(5515), 281–284.

  • Ploeg, Van der and de Gischolar_main, R. S., The TEEB Valuation Database – a Searchable Database of 1310 Estimates of Monetary Values of Ecosystem Services. Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010.

  • Power, A. G., Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2010, 365, 2959– 2971.

  • Swinton, S., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. P. and Landis, D., Ecosystem services from agriculture: looking beyond the usual suspects. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 2006, 88(5), 1160–1166.

  • Dale, V. H. and Polansky, S., Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ., 2007, 64, 286– 296.

  • Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R. and Case, B., Future farming: value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecol. Econ., 2008, 64, 835–848.

  • Chand, R., Doubling farmers income: rationale, strategy, prospects and action plan. NITI Policy Paper No. 1/2017, NITI Aayog, Government of India, 2017, p. 33.

  • Myers, N., The next green revolution: its environmental underpinnings. Curr. Sci., 1999, 76(4), 507–513.

  • Federici, S., Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Jacobs, H. and Schmidhuber, J., New estimates of CO2 forest emissions and removals: 1990–2015. For. Ecol. Manage., 2015, 352, 89–98.

  • Alagh, Y. K., Planning the agricultural vision. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2018, 73(1), 1–16.

  • Swaminathan, M. S. and Kesavan, P. C., The transition from green to evergreen revolution. EC Agric., 2015, 2(1), 271–276.

  • Kesavan, P. C. and Swaminathan, M. S., From green revolution to evergreen revolution: pathways and terminologies. Curr. Sci., 2006, 91(2), 145–146.

  • FAO, Organic agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1999.

  • FAO, Training Manual on Organic, Technology and Practices for Smallholder Farmers, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2015.

  • IFOAM Organics International, Principles of Organic Agriculture. Preamble, 2008; https://www.ifoam.bio/sites/default/files/poa_english_web.pdf

  • FAO, Sustainable agriculture and rural development in Asia and Pacific. Regional Document No. 2, FAO/The Netherlands Conference on Agriculture and Environment, 15–19 April 1991.

  • Buck, L. E., Milder, J. C., Gavin, T. A. and Mukherjee, I., Understanding eco-agriculture: a framework for measuring landscape performance. Ecoagriculture Discussion Paper No. 2, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA, 2006.

  • Acharya, S. S., Sustainable agriculture and rural livelihoods. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2006, 19, 205–217.

  • Kesavan, P. C. and Swaminathan, M. S., International year of family farming: a boost to evergreeen revolution. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(12), 1972–1974.

  • de Krom, M. P. M. M., Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: regionalisation and the role of bridging social capital. Land Use Policy, 2017, 60, 352–361.

  • Kuhfuss, L., Préget, R., Thoyer, S. and Hanley, N., Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 2016, 43(4), 609–636.

  • Devi, P. I. et al., Payment for ecosystem services. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2017, 52(17), 12–14.

  • Chandrakanth, M. G. and Nagaraja, M. G., Payment for ecosystem services for water – case of Cauvery. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(9), 1375–1376.

  • Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India (GoI), National Environmental Policy, 2016; http://envfor.nic.in/sites/default/files/introduction-nep2006e.pdf

  • GoI, Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2016, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2017.

  • Ministry of Finance, All statements of budget estimate. Union Budget for 2018–19, GoI, 2018.

  • Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Income, expenditures, productive assets and indebtedness of agricultural households in India. NSS 70th Round, January–December 2013, GoI, 2016.


Abstract Views: 229

PDF Views: 73




  • Ecosystem Services Approach for Revitalizing Agriculture in India

Abstract Views: 229  |  PDF Views: 73

Authors

M. Manjula
M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai 600 113, India
L. Venkatachalam
Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai 600 020, India
P. Mukhopadhyay
Goa University, Goa 403 206, India
Lalit Kumar
Bhim Rao Ambedkar College, Delhi University, Delhi 110 094, India

Abstract


Agricultural landscapes referred to as ‘agro-ecosystems’ provide both marketable and non-marketable ecosystem services. The ability of agro-ecosystems to provide ecosystem services is limited by the nature of production systems and production method. Promotion of input-intensive production systems results in short-term productivity gains along with long-term ecological and environmental losses. India’s agriculture suffers from various ecological problems such as soil pollution, overexploitation of groundwater and loss of biodiversity. Policy measures aimed at improving agriculture should shift from a purely ‘productivity enhancement’ objective towards promotion of ecologically sustainable pro-environmental agricultural production (PAP) practices to realize the goal of ‘productivity in perpetuity’. This article examines the feasibility of ‘nudges and incentives’ in payment for ecosystem services/agri-environmental schemes (PES/AES) type schemes in India which could be a possible policy solution. It could nudge farmers to PAP practices and would be fiscally feasible even for individual states to adopt in a federal system of governance.

Keywords


Agro-Ecosystems, Evergreen Revolution, Payment For Ecosystem Services, Pro-Environmental Agricultural Production.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi5%2F723-727