Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A GIS-Based Approach for Radiation Risk Assessment Around a Thermal Power Plant Towards Adopting Remedial Measures


Affiliations
1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, India
2 Department of Science and Technology and Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata 700 091, India
 

Coal combustion in thermal power plants releases ash, which is reported to cause adverse health hazards in humans and other organisms. Owing to the presence of radionuclides, it is also considered as a potential radiation hazard. In this study, based on the surface radiation measurements and relevant ancillary data, expected radiation risk zones were identified with regard to human population residing near a thermal power plant using GIS. With population density as the vulnerability determining criterion, about 20% of the study area was in the ‘high’ risk zone and another 20% in the ‘low’ risk zone. The remaining 60% was under ‘medium’ risk zone. Based on the findings of this study, greenbelt locations have been proposed as a remedial measure.

Keywords

Geographic Information System, Radiation Risk Analysis, Remedial Measures, Surface Radiation, Thermal Power Plant.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Amin, Y. M., Khandaker, M. U., Shyen, A. K. S., Mahat, R. H., Nor, R. M. and Bradley, D. A. Radionuclide emissions from a coal-fired power plant. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 2013, 80, 109–116, doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.06.014.

  • Nalbandian, H., Trace Element Emissions from Coal, 2012; IEA Clean Coal Centre, CCC/203, ISBN 9789290295235.

  • Sahu, S. K., Tiwari, M., Bhangare, R. C., Ajmal, P. Y. and Pandit, G. G., Partitioning behavior of natural radionuclides during combustion of coal in thermal power plants. Environ. Forensics, 2017, 18, 36–43; doi:10.1080/15275922.2016.1230910.

  • Flues, M., Camargo, I. M. C., Silva, P. S. C. and Mazzilli, B. P., Radioactivity of coal and ashes from Figueira coal power plant in Brazil. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2006, 270, 597–602.

  • Karangelos, D. J., Petropoulos, N. P., Anagnostakis, M. J., Hinis, E. P. and Simopoulos, S. E., Radiological characteristics and investigation of the radioactive equilibrium in the ashes produced in lignite-fired power plants. J. Environ. Radioact., 2004, 77, 233– 246; doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.03.009.

  • Bhangare, R. C., Ajmal, P. Y., Sahu, S. K., Pandit, G. G. and Puranik, V. D., Distribution of trace elements in coal and combustion residues from five thermal power plants in India. Int. J. Coal Geol., 2011, 86, 349–356; doi:10.1016/j.coal.2011.03.008.

  • Flues, M., Sato, I. M., Scapin, M. A., Cotrim, M. E. B. and Camargo, I. M. C., Toxic elements mobility in coal and ashes of Figueira coal power plant, Brazil. Fuel, 2013, 103, 430–436; doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.045.

  • Xu, M., Yan, R., Zheng, C., Qiao, Y., Han, J. and Sheng, C., Status of trace element emission in a coal combustion process: a review. Fuel Process. Technol., 2003, 85, 215–237; doi:10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00174-7.

  • Lu, X., Zhao, C., Chen, C. and Liu, W., Radioactivity level of soil around Baqiao coal-fired power plant in China. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2012, 81, 1827–1832, doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.07.013.

  • Corbacho, J. A. and Baeza, A., Measurement of natural radionuclides and external radiation exposure due to fly ash from a coalfired power plant (Spain) deposited on soils – comparison using two different measurement techniques. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2018, 1–8, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncy083.

  • Lu, X., Li, L. Y., Wang, F., Wang, L. and Zhang, X., Radiological hazards of coal and ash samples collected from Xi’an coal-fired power plants of China. Environ. Earth Sci., 2012, 66, 1925–1932; doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1417-x.

  • Liu, G., Luo, Q., Ding, M. and Feng, J., Natural radionuclides in soil near a coal-fired power plant in the high background radiation area, South China. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2015, 187, 356, doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4501-y.

  • Charro, E. and Peña, V., Environmental impact of natural radionuclides from a coal-fired power plant in Spain. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2013, 153, 485–495; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs126.

  • https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radiation-health-effects

  • Tadmor, J., Radioactivity from coal-fired power plants : a review. J. Environ. Radioact., 1986, 4, 177–204.

  • Varnes, D. J., Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. Natural Hazards, UNESCO, Paris, 1984, 3; ISBN 923-101895-7.

  • Adhya, S., Management of fly ash of Kolaghat thermal power station, Purba Medinipur, West Bengal. Electron. Int. Interdiscip. Res. J., 2014, III, 32–43.

  • Pramanik, P., Chowdhury, R., Biswas, S. and Syamal, A. K., Assault of coal-fired thermal power plant on pulmonary health of school boys aged 7 to 15 years. IOSR J. Dent. Med. Sci., 2015, 14, 133–139; doi:10.9790/0853-1463133139.

  • Mondal, M., Land people – a dynamic interaction of Purba Medinipur district, West Bengal. IOSR J. Pharm. 2012, 2, 56–61.

  • http://www.wbpdcl.co.in/component/content/article/14-sample-data-articles/90-generatingunits-kolaghat-overview.html.

  • Census, Villagewise Population data, Government of India, 2011; http://censusindia.gov.in

  • UNSCEAR, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on Environmental and Atomic Radiation, New York, 2000.

  • Casella, G., Illustrating empirical Bayes method. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1992, 16, 107–125.

  • Krivoruchko, K., Empirical Bayesian Kriging, Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) Press, Redlands, CA, USA, 2012, pp. 6–10.

  • Glade, T., Birkmann, J. and Fuchs, S., Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis : current approaches and future challenges. Nat. Hazards, 2012, 64, 1969–1975; doi:10.1007/ s11069-012-0352-9.

  • Chatzimouratidis, A. I. and Pilavachi, P. A., Objective and subjective evaluation of power plants and their non-radioactive emissions using the analytic hierarchy process. Energ. Policy, 2007, 35, 4027–4038; doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.003.

  • Saaty, T. L., Decision making – the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 2004, 13, 1–35.

  • Bello-Dambatta, A., Farmani, R., Javadi, A. A. and Evans, B. M., The analytical hierarchy process for contaminated land management. Adv. Eng. Inform., 2009, 23, 433–441; doi:10.1016/j.aei.2009.06.006.

  • Bhushan, N. and Rai, K., The analytic hierarchy process. In Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process, Springer-Verlag London, 2004; pp. 11–21; ISBN 1-85233-756-7.

  • Saaty, R. W., The analytic hierarchy process – what and how it is used. Math. Model., 1987, 9, 161–176.

  • Saaty, T. L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol., 1977, 15, 234–281.

  • Saaty, T. L., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci., 2008, 1, 83–98.

  • Jenks, G., The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int. Yearb. Cartogr., 1967, 7, 186–190.


Abstract Views: 380

PDF Views: 136




  • A GIS-Based Approach for Radiation Risk Assessment Around a Thermal Power Plant Towards Adopting Remedial Measures

Abstract Views: 380  |  PDF Views: 136

Authors

Kajori Parial
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, India
S. Mukherjee
Department of Science and Technology and Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata 700 091, India
A. R. Ghosh
Department of Science and Technology and Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata 700 091, India
D. Sengupta
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, India

Abstract


Coal combustion in thermal power plants releases ash, which is reported to cause adverse health hazards in humans and other organisms. Owing to the presence of radionuclides, it is also considered as a potential radiation hazard. In this study, based on the surface radiation measurements and relevant ancillary data, expected radiation risk zones were identified with regard to human population residing near a thermal power plant using GIS. With population density as the vulnerability determining criterion, about 20% of the study area was in the ‘high’ risk zone and another 20% in the ‘low’ risk zone. The remaining 60% was under ‘medium’ risk zone. Based on the findings of this study, greenbelt locations have been proposed as a remedial measure.

Keywords


Geographic Information System, Radiation Risk Analysis, Remedial Measures, Surface Radiation, Thermal Power Plant.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi10%2F1683-1689