Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of the Decision-Making Process for Urban Public Transport in India:A Delphi Approach


Affiliations
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
 

The Government of India has proposed and constructed various mass rapid transit projects, such as metro rail and bus rapid transit system (BRTS) projects, under the purview of the National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP), Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) and other such schemes. However, with less experience in these newly proposed and constructed systems, the projects are surrounded by controversies and doubts. Many questions have been raised regarding the decision-making process for selecting mass rapid transit systems (MRTS) modes. This study attempts to check these doubts and identify other issues associated with the decision-making process. Thus, the study’s objective is to identify and prioritize the issues associated with the decision-making process of selecting modes of public transport (MRTS) in India. The study uses the Delphi method and represents a successful application of the approach in urban transport planning. The study identifies 12 issues and their priority in the decision-making process of selecting a public transport (MRTS) mode. The study concludes that the prevailing situations in decision- making process in India contradict the guidelines suggested in NUTP.

Keywords

Delphi, India Urban Transport, MRTS India, Public Transport, Urban Transport.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ministry of Urban Development G, National Urban Transport Policy, 2006; http://urbanindia.nic.in/policies/TransportPolicy.pdf

  • Agarwal, O. P., Urban transport. In India Infrastructure Report 2006 – Urban Infrastructure, New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 106–129; http://www.idfc.com/pdf/report/IIR-2006.pdf

  • Agarwal, O. P. et al., Review of urban transport in India, New Delhi, IUT & CSTEP, UNEP Riso Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development Technical University of Denmak, 2014; https://wedocs.unep/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/16958/Case-Study_MetroRails.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Pucher, J., Korattyswaroopam, N. and Ittyerah, N., The crisis of public transport in India : overwhelming needs but limited resources. J. Publ. Transp., 2004, 7(3), 1–20.

  • Singh, S. K., Urban transport in India: issues, challenges, and the way forward. Eur. Transp., 2012, 52(52), 1–26.

  • Advani, M. and Tiwari, G., Evaluation of public transport systems : case study of Delhi Metro. In START-2005, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India, 2005, pp. 1–8; http://tripp.iitd.ernet.in/publications/paper/planning/mukti_metro_kharagpur_05.pdf

  • Mohan, D., Mythologies, metro rail systems and future urban transport. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2008, 43, 41–53; http://tripp.iitd.ernet.in/delhibrts/metro/Metro/Metro Mythology08.pdf

  • Goel, R. and Tiwari, G., Promoting low carbon transport in india: Case Study of Metro Rails in Indian Cities, 2014; http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Review%20of%20Urban%20Transport%20in%20India.pdf

  • Sreenivas, A., Urban transport planning: lessons from the proposed Pune metro rail. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2011; xlvi(6), 27–32; http://www.epw.in/commentary/urban-transport-planning-lessons-proposed-pune-metro-rail.html

  • Randhawa, P., Delhi metro rail beyond mass transit. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2012, XLVII, 25–29.

  • Sanghvi, D. and Varia, H. R., Light rail transit – today’s need for developing cities in India. Int. J. Sci. Res., 2015, 4(3), 596– 601.

  • Ravibabu, M. and Sree, V. P., Public transport for Indian urban agglomerations – a strong case for surface rail. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2014, 49(23), 105–116.

  • Ministry of Urban Development G, National Urban Transport Policy, 2014; www.iutindia.org

  • Mahadevia, D., Joshi, R. B. and Datey, A., Ahmedabad’s BRT system: a sustainable urban transport panacea? Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2013, xlviiI(48), 56–64; http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259289231

  • Landeta, J., Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2006, 73(5), 467–482; doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002.

  • Masser, I. and Foley, P., Delphi revisited: expert opinion in urban analysis. Urban Stud., 1987, 24(3), 217–225; doi:10.1080/00420988720080351.

  • Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S. D., The Delphi method as a research ool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform. Manage., 2004, 42(1), 15–29; doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.

  • Rowe, G. and Wright, G., The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int. J. Forecast., 1999, 15(4), 353–375; doi:10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.

  • Schmidt, R. C., Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sci., 1997, 28(3), 763–774; doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x.

  • Shah, H. A. and Kalaian, S. A., Which is the best parametric statistical method for analyzing Delphi data? J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Meth., 2009, 8(1), 226–232; doi:10.22237/jmasm/1241137140.

  • Von der Gracht, H. A., Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2012, 79(8), 1525–1536; doi:10.1016/ j.techfore.2012.04.013.

  • Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A. and Izadyar, S., Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. Int. J. Eng. Sci., 2014, 3(4), 8–13; doi:10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.

  • Kobus, J. and Westner, M., Ranking-type delphi studies in IS research : step-by-step guide and analytical extension. IADIS Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., 2016, 28–38.

  • Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M., The Delphi Method – Techniques and Applications, 1975; ISBN 0-201-04294-0.

  • Paré, G., Cameron, A. F., Poba-Nzaou, P. and Templier, M., A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems rankingtype Delphi studies. Inform. Manage., 2013, 50(5), 207–217; doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.03.003.

  • Alyami, S. H., Rezgui, Y. and Kwan, A., Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 2013, 27, 43–54; doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.011.

  • Ju, B. and Jin, T., Incorporating nonparametric statistics into Delphi studies in library and information science. Inform. Res., 2015, 18(03), 1–11.

  • Hasson, F., Keeney, S. and McKenna, H., Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J. Adv. Nurs., 2000, 32(4), 1008– 1015; doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x.

  • Wassenaar, A., van den Boogaard, M., Schoonhoven, L. and Pickkers, P., Determination of the feasibility of a multicomponent intervention program to prevent delirium in the intensive care unit: a modified RAND Delphi study. Aust. Crit. Care, 2016, doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2016.12.004.

  • Yang, Y.-N., Methodology for testing the stability of experts’ opinions between successive rounds of Delphi studies. In Conference Proceedings, American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, 2003, pp. 1–8.

  • Cicchetti, D. V., Guidlines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evalauting normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess., 1994, 6(4), 284–290; doi:10.1037/ 1040-3590.6.4.284.

  • Blackman, N. J. M. and Koval, J. J., Interval estimation for Cohen’s kappa as a measure of agreement. Stat. Med., 2000, 19(5), 723–741; doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000315)19:5< 723::AID-SIM379>3.0.CO;2-A.

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs G, Metro Rail Policy, 2017.

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs G, Appraisal Guidelines for Metro Rail Project Proposals Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs Government of India, 2017.


Abstract Views: 363

PDF Views: 127




  • Evaluation of the Decision-Making Process for Urban Public Transport in India:A Delphi Approach

Abstract Views: 363  |  PDF Views: 127

Authors

Nitin Lambat
Department of Architecture and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
Vijay Kapse
Department of Architecture and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
Chandra Sabnani
Department of Architecture and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India

Abstract


The Government of India has proposed and constructed various mass rapid transit projects, such as metro rail and bus rapid transit system (BRTS) projects, under the purview of the National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP), Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) and other such schemes. However, with less experience in these newly proposed and constructed systems, the projects are surrounded by controversies and doubts. Many questions have been raised regarding the decision-making process for selecting mass rapid transit systems (MRTS) modes. This study attempts to check these doubts and identify other issues associated with the decision-making process. Thus, the study’s objective is to identify and prioritize the issues associated with the decision-making process of selecting modes of public transport (MRTS) in India. The study uses the Delphi method and represents a successful application of the approach in urban transport planning. The study identifies 12 issues and their priority in the decision-making process of selecting a public transport (MRTS) mode. The study concludes that the prevailing situations in decision- making process in India contradict the guidelines suggested in NUTP.

Keywords


Delphi, India Urban Transport, MRTS India, Public Transport, Urban Transport.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi10%2F1706-1714